Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here’s an article from the Daily Pennsylvanian on the wording change.
http://www.thedp.com/article/2023/03/penn-legacy-admissions-policy-changes-university
This is Penn’s current legacy policy/statement:
“We appreciate that attending Penn is a tradition for many families. The Admissions Office identifies legacy applicants based on the information provided in a student’s application and defines “legacy” as being either a child or grandchild of alumni. Legacies who apply to Penn—like all applicants—receive thorough consideration in the application process."
It’s clear from this statement that Penn still considers legacy status in its admissions process. What is the controversy?
Read the article,
it’s interpreted as downgrading the status of legacy at Penn.
Whose interpretation? The student who wrote the article? If Penn was no longer considering legacy status, it would just say so—similar to what JHU and Amherst have done. Stop assuming.
Hopkins stopped giving a legacy preference for several years before they announced it.
Nearly a decade ago, Johns Hopkins University, the powerhouse research university located in Baltimore, Maryland, began a quiet experiment: It started to eliminate “legacy preference”—a special boost it gave to the children, grandchildren and siblings of alumni–from its undergraduate admissions process. The move was so sensitive, the school didn’t make the change public until 2020. Last fall, 1.8% of Johns Hopkins’s incoming freshmen were children of alumni, down from 8.5% in 2013.