| Congrats! Can’t wait to see the first pics! |
Have you not seen pics of the Kardashian women from earlier in their lives?? Not quite so hot. |
Yeah but I bet they all have more average looking kids (the Kardashians are actually a great example of this - Kim was always stunning and the other kids were just normal cute.). In general I think it’s safe to say that being a great beauty is the exception, no matter the parentage. |
Margot had a baby boy, so we wouldn’t refer to him as a great beauty anyway. I think he will be cute! Great genes - both mother and father are good looking. |
+1 Shiloh Jolie Pitt is good looking and her parents are gorgeous. |
| She clearly lies about her age, right? |
Kaia Gerber and Sailor Brinkley, while very attractive, are not as good looking as their mothers were at their ages. |
Reversion to the mean is absolutely consistent with attractive people have attractive kids. It’s just that the second generation of attractive parents is on average less attractive. It does not mean the second generation skips over average and goes to ugly. At all. |
That's definitely not how it works. But ok... |
+1 less attractive but still good looking |
And that’s exactly what I said. They may not be as good looking as their parents, but they are still good looking. |
How do you think it works? |
| Most of the time the gorgeous mom doesn’t marry a gorgeous dad (see eg tje kardashian dad or Billy Joel or even the gerber dad). But with some of these movie star combos (Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie) you do get the gorgeous gorgeous combo! Doesn’t mean they will be as atttactive because things combine differently for a different effect. |
I agree that genetics are at least half of destiny |
Yeah the first gen attractive people land outside of 3 sigma, so top .01% attractive. Their kids land somewhere between top 1% to top 3%, still way better than avg joe but not as stunning as their parents. |