17 year-old jacks a Moped at gunpoint on New Hampshire Ave

[Anonymous]

I am not even surprised. This area keeps voting in people who make policies that are soft on crime, so we are reaping what we sowed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You would think the DC police would know better than to pursue a moped driver.

Don’t worry. The involved officers will be charged shortly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Alleged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Feds can’t take DC over soon enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Feds can’t take DC over soon enough.

Agree. I can’t believe these are called “leaders”.

[Anonymous]

Yikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

What needs to be done to change this law? It needs to be reduced to 13 imo, but realistically 16.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Presumably they still have to be released into parental custody though?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Yikes.

I use that Metro stop daily.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Presumably they still have to be released into parental custody though?

That's silly. They are an adult for purposes of release.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Presumably they still have to be released into parental custody though?

That's silly. They are an adult for purposes of release.

No. Wrong. A 25 year-old is NOT an adult in D.C.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Presumably they still have to be released into parental custody though?

That's silly. They are an adult for purposes of release.

No. Wrong. A 25 year-old is NOT an adult in D.C.

Doesn't matter either way. In this case we are talking about a 17 year old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Got to love the DC catch and release program. Should get 15-20 for committing a crime while armed.

This. Amazed you are released after an armed robbery.

Up to age 26, he is a “juvenile offender” under DC law.

So he cannot be held in jail.

Presumably they still have to be released into parental custody though?

That's silly. They are an adult for purposes of release.

No. Wrong. A 25 year-old is NOT an adult in D.C.

They are for the purposes of gun, weed, and alcohol.