Harris interview with MSNBC Sept 25 - 24minute video

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris August strategy was to take over for Biden, win Democrat support, build enthusiasm, and raise a ton of money and volunteers. Fine.

Now it's late September. She needs to spend that money and volunteers convincing moderates that she has something to offer.

Her job is to win. she does that by getting more people registered to vote and getting those voters to execute their ballots. If she can get independents and "never Trump" republicans, then all the better. Her job should not be to pander her vision to the middle. If "independents" want to vote for Trump, then we will get the country we deserve.

32% D
30% R
35 I

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Q1: 2 minutes. Economic plan. 0 information provided.

Q2: 2minutes. Trump economy: attacked Trump's performance in plan

Q3: 2 minutes Trump's tax model expires. What's next?
No tax increases for people earning under $400K. Unclear if that's related to Trump's tax, or post-expiration model. Child tax credit. Corporate tax and billionaire tax raise. No specific proposal.

Q4: 2 minutes How to build more housing, not just subsidizing prices?
Tax incentives. "3 million more units". "Reduce red tape" . "Do something eth transit dollars". No details or examples. "Holistic".

Q5: 2 minutes Liberty Bell in PA. Japanese company.(Some steel plant? What is this issue?)
"Rah rah steel and steelworker.s."

Half time. Unions next.

If this is your standard, then you have a much higher bar for her than for Trump. Judge them on the same standard and the comparison isn't close, but if you are going to grade Trump on a curve, then that is the bias coming through.

I'm a college educated UMC liberal in MD.

She doesn't need my vote.

She needs middle class medium education people in PA, MI, WI, maybe NC, GA

More important are exciting "the base" - that is how Biden and Obama were successful. Chasing after the mythical indpendents is a fools game and why Hillary lost.

Uh dude Harris has gotten the base all excited and enthused. Where have you been?

I am not saying it isn't excited. I am saying the Obama/Biden blueprint is successful, the Hillary blueprint isn't.

[Anonymous]

Meh. She gets a C+ to Trump's straight F's.

[Anonymous]

Re wonky:

Wonky is bad.

Bland is bad too.

Trump sells a vision. Is a psychedelic insane vision, but it's colorful and energetic and people pick out bits that resonate and ignore the rest.

Harris needs to paint a picture of how her changes will crate something specific and tangible. "Getting your family out of a moldy 1 bedroom and into a 3 bedroom house with green grass". "30 minutes from your clean suburban home to the office, on a modern, clean fast train or bus, and someone else is driving"
"Same pay for fewer hours on safer jobsites, so you have time to eat dinner at the table your wife and kids, and teach them to count to 10 with all your fingers"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Q1: 2 minutes. Economic plan. 0 information provided.

Q2: 2minutes. Trump economy: attacked Trump's performance in plan

Q3: 2 minutes Trump's tax model expires. What's next?
No tax increases for people earning under $400K. Unclear if that's related to Trump's tax, or post-expiration model. Child tax credit. Corporate tax and billionaire tax raise. No specific proposal.

Q4: 2 minutes How to build more housing, not just subsidizing prices?
Tax incentives. "3 million more units". "Reduce red tape" . "Do something eth transit dollars". No details or examples. "Holistic".

Q5: 2 minutes Liberty Bell in PA. Japanese company.(Some steel plant? What is this issue?)
"Rah rah steel and steelworker.s."

Half time. Unions next.

If this is your standard, then you have a much higher bar for her than for Trump. Judge them on the same standard and the comparison isn't close, but if you are going to grade Trump on a curve, then that is the bias coming through.

I'm a college educated UMC liberal in MD.

She doesn't need my vote.

She needs middle class medium education people in PA, MI, WI, maybe NC, GA

More important are exciting "the base" - that is how Biden and Obama were successful. Chasing after the mythical indpendents is a fools game and why Hillary lost.

Uh dude Harris has gotten the base all excited and enthused. Where have you been?

I am not saying it isn't excited. I am saying the Obama/Biden blueprint is successful, the Hillary blueprint isn't.

I've said this before. She's not Obama. She won't get all of Obama's votes. She needs something else in the mix.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meh. She gets a C+ to Trump's straight F's.

The jokers and clowns in back like the Fs.
The exhausted and bored just go to sleep.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Q1: 2 minutes. Economic plan. 0 information provided.

Q2: 2minutes. Trump economy: attacked Trump's performance in plan

Q3: 2 minutes Trump's tax model expires. What's next?
No tax increases for people earning under $400K. Unclear if that's related to Trump's tax, or post-expiration model. Child tax credit. Corporate tax and billionaire tax raise. No specific proposal.

Q4: 2 minutes How to build more housing, not just subsidizing prices?
Tax incentives. "3 million more units". "Reduce red tape" . "Do something eth transit dollars". No details or examples. "Holistic".

Q5: 2 minutes Liberty Bell in PA. Japanese company.(Some steel plant? What is this issue?)
"Rah rah steel and steelworker.s."

Half time. Unions next.

If this is your standard, then you have a much higher bar for her than for Trump. Judge them on the same standard and the comparison isn't close, but if you are going to grade Trump on a curve, then that is the bias coming through.

I'm a college educated UMC liberal in MD.

She doesn't need my vote.

She needs middle class medium education people in PA, MI, WI, maybe NC, GA

More important are exciting "the base" - that is how Biden and Obama were successful. Chasing after the mythical indpendents is a fools game and why Hillary lost.

Uh dude Harris has gotten the base all excited and enthused. Where have you been?

I am not saying it isn't excited. I am saying the Obama/Biden blueprint is successful, the Hillary blueprint isn't.

I've said this before. She's not Obama. She won't get all of Obama's votes. She needs something else in the mix.

Abortion is in the mix. But it's still kind of abstract to a lot of people, especially men. It's not constantly on top of mind like every gas tank refill and grocery shop.

[Anonymous]

Trump won in 2016 and almost won in 2020.
Saying "Trump sucks" is not enough to win an election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris August strategy was to take over for Biden, win Democrat support, build enthusiasm, and raise a ton of money and volunteers. Fine.

Now it's late September. She needs to spend that money and volunteers convincing moderates that she has something to offer.

Her job is to win. she does that by getting more people registered to vote and getting those voters to execute their ballots. If she can get independents and "never Trump" republicans, then all the better. Her job should not be to pander her vision to the middle. If "independents" want to vote for Trump, then we will get the country we deserve.

This.

[Anonymous]

Her wanting an unrealized capital gains tax tells you everything you need to know. Stay away from it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump won in 2016 and almost won in 2020.
Saying "Trump sucks" is not enough to win an election.

Almost won

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her wanting an unrealized capital gains tax tells you everything you need to know. Stay away from it.

Unless you have over $100 million in assets, it doesn't affect you. It is also impossible to implement, so is really a non-issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Q1: 2 minutes. Economic plan. 0 information provided.

Q2: 2minutes. Trump economy: attacked Trump's performance in plan

Q3: 2 minutes Trump's tax model expires. What's next?
No tax increases for people earning under $400K. Unclear if that's related to Trump's tax, or post-expiration model. Child tax credit. Corporate tax and billionaire tax raise. No specific proposal.

Q4: 2 minutes How to build more housing, not just subsidizing prices?
Tax incentives. "3 million more units". "Reduce red tape" . "Do something eth transit dollars". No details or examples. "Holistic".

Q5: 2 minutes Liberty Bell in PA. Japanese company.(Some steel plant? What is this issue?)
"Rah rah steel and steelworker.s."

Half time. Unions next.

If this is your standard, then you have a much higher bar for her than for Trump. Judge them on the same standard and the comparison isn't close, but if you are going to grade Trump on a curve, then that is the bias coming through.

I'm a college educated UMC liberal in MD.

She doesn't need my vote.

She needs middle class medium education people in PA, MI, WI, maybe NC, GA

More important are exciting "the base" - that is how Biden and Obama were successful. Chasing after the mythical indpendents is a fools game and why Hillary lost.

Uh dude Harris has gotten the base all excited and enthused. Where have you been?

I'm sure that's what the media has told you

[Anonymous]

What's worse - not knowing what an "Opportunity Economy" is or not knowing what a "holistic approach" is?

[Anonymous]

Why is the “journalist” smiling and nodding approvingly while the candidate is attempting to answer?