SCOTUS even more corrupt than we imagined

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Good for you.

[Anonymous]

This is appalling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

This post smells almost as bad as the conservative corruption on the SCOTUS.

I am pretty sure that PP was meant to be sarcasm.

I read that post and I am pretty sure poster was dead serious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Roberts memo to other justices on Trump immunity leaked to NY Times
If this isn't an impeachable offense, what is?

https://l.smartnews.com/p-Pykiq/IUxcZ7

What is the offense? Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is allowed to have opinions and make decisions. That’s exactly what his job is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

And both Christian nationalists whose spouses won’t admit that they’re compromised justices and unable to practice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

And both Christian nationalists whose spouses won’t admit that they’re compromised justices and unable to practice.

This SCOTUS is a sham.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

And both Christian nationalists whose spouses won’t admit that they’re compromised justices and unable to practice.

This SCOTUS is a sham.

Yes.

Bought and paid for with dark money, here to legitimize illegitimate and/or illegal actions by Republicans.

We see you, fascists on the Supreme Court. We can’t do anything about you, but we see you. You’re illegitimate. You’re fascists. And history will not be kind to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

And both Christian nationalists whose spouses won’t admit that they’re compromised justices and unable to practice.

This SCOTUS is a sham.

Yes.

Bought and paid for with dark money, here to legitimize illegitimate and/or illegal actions by Republicans.

We see you, fascists on the Supreme Court. We can’t do anything about you, but we see you. You’re illegitimate. You’re fascists. And history will not be kind to you.

I realize they're living in the "here and now" but what they really care about long-term is their legacy. And that's absolutely shot. There's no reclamation possible.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

And both Christian nationalists whose spouses won’t admit that they’re compromised justices and unable to practice.

This SCOTUS is a sham.

Yes.

Bought and paid for with dark money, here to legitimize illegitimate and/or illegal actions by Republicans.

We see you, fascists on the Supreme Court. We can’t do anything about you, but we see you. You’re illegitimate. You’re fascists. And history will not be kind to you.

I realize they're living in the "here and now" but what they really care about long-term is their legacy. And that's absolutely shot. There's no reclamation possible.

Some days in the future, 2075, it will come out that both Thomas and Alito sold their votes to the highest bidder.

[Anonymous]

Why do conservatives always have to cheat to win?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do conservatives always have to cheat to win?

Because what they want is dreadful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Sure. I'm sure it's just a coincidence we never got the results of the "internal investigation" over the Dobbs leak. After you nuts were screaming about liberals being the leakers and calling for the heads of the justices who weren't Trump puppets. Then you went silent when it became clear it was your side that leaked it.

I know the identity of the leaker. It was not 'your side' nor was it a liberal justice.

Martha Ann Alito? She and Ginni Thompson are both despicable.

And both Christian nationalists whose spouses won’t admit that they’re compromised justices and unable to practice.

This SCOTUS is a sham.

Yes.

Bought and paid for with dark money, here to legitimize illegitimate and/or illegal actions by Republicans.

We see you, fascists on the Supreme Court. We can’t do anything about you, but we see you. You’re illegitimate. You’re fascists. And history will not be kind to you.

Yeah, these clowns want to talk about "deep state" crap, meanwhile, Ginny is directly/indirectly making money off of cases coming before the court when she's not busy being a terrorist on behalf of a criminal whose cases get to come before her husband. Meanwhile, these right-wing psychos would go ballistic if Kagan had actually accepted the bagel platter she was sent. Can you imagine? The woman rejected a mere platter and I believe KBJ rejected some flowers sent by Oprah, The corrupt scum on the right are going on expensive yachts and retreats with billionaires with cases before the court. Sickening.

Are you right-wingers really in denial about how you've corrupted the court? It's despicable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

These justices aren't even run-of-the-mill conservatives--they're ULTRA right wing. Like right of right. Are you comfortable with that? Do you think it makes sense to have a SC that produces decisions that lean towards any extreme?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More liberal crybabies whining about the Supreme Court, just because they can’t bully the justices into delivering the liberal opinions that they want.

Thing is. They could get the opinions without the grift and blatant corruption. While I disagree with the conservative direction of the court, I had at least assumed that they were ethical. I was obviously naive and wrong.

Eh, it was obvious the SC wasn't ethical when the Kavanaugh appointment took place. There was definitely some weird corrupt stuff there.