Vance vs Harris

[Anonymous]

I think Biden needs to dump Kamala, and bring someone new aboard. That’s his best shot at winning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The book, if true, lays out a deeply, deeply misogynistic worldview in which his mother bears the blame for his father and grandfather’s abuse, which they have no apparent guilt for.

That is plain silly. She was a drug addict. He lives by his mom now, who is in recovery

A drug addict raised by an abusive father who he worships.

[Anonymous]

I think they are both extremely smart and extremely unlikeable. I just hope that the one I like slightly more wins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The book, if true, lays out a deeply, deeply misogynistic worldview in which his mother bears the blame for his father and grandfather’s abuse, which they have no apparent guilt for.

There's always one of you

[Anonymous]

JD Vance is a charlatan and pseudo intellectual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Vance write the book that became a movie starring Amy Adams as his mom and Glenn Close as grandmaw or mee maw? Hillbilly Elegy?

Yes, that book showed his true disdain for middle America. And yet, those very same people are going to vote for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Vance write the book that became a movie starring Amy Adams as his mom and Glenn Close as grandmaw or mee maw? Hillbilly Elegy?

Is the movie any good? I’ve neither watched it or read the book

The book is an interesting read but mostly a con. The movie is unwatchable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is an opportunist, which was apparent even at the time his book became popular, before he ever entered politics. He's a turncoat who despised Trump before he understood Trumpism was the way to more power and riches.

Harris is your regular politician, slightly corrupt like they all are, but by no means rotten.

However Biden can see his way to stepping aside now and letting Harris fight the good fight. With a centrist (or even conservative) VP as young as Vance, for good measure. I'd like Kinzinger.

how is she "slightly corrupt"

What crimes are you suggesting she has committed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is a charlatan and pseudo intellectual.

Perfect match. At least his wife is

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is an opportunist, which was apparent even at the time his book became popular, before he ever entered politics. He's a turncoat who despised Trump before he understood Trumpism was the way to more power and riches.

Harris is your regular politician, slightly corrupt like they all are, but by no means rotten.

However Biden can see his way to stepping aside now and letting Harris fight the good fight. With a centrist (or even conservative) VP as young as Vance, for good measure. I'd like Kinzinger.

how is she "slightly corrupt"

What crimes are you suggesting she has committed?

Alienation of affection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is an opportunist, which was apparent even at the time his book became popular, before he ever entered politics. He's a turncoat who despised Trump before he understood Trumpism was the way to more power and riches.

Harris is your regular politician, slightly corrupt like they all are, but by no means rotten.

However Biden can see his way to stepping aside now and letting Harris fight the good fight. With a centrist (or even conservative) VP as young as Vance, for good measure. I'd like Kinzinger.

how is she "slightly corrupt"

What crimes are you suggesting she has committed?

Alienation of affection.

And if that is the case, the...Donald?

[Anonymous]

*then

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Given the odds that we may well get one of them in the oval given the ages of Trump and Biden, let’s talk through the merits of these VP candidates and their records. Besides being a mouthpiece for Trump I don’t know much about Vance. And Harris’ record as a DA in CA doesn’t sit well with me…

Obviously, they'd both be better options to serve as POTUS until 2029 relative to the two likely elderly nominees; then again who isn't a better option?

[Anonymous]

JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction