YSL cross bodies have become so basic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t judge any one individual who has or wears one, but I can’t stand that I can go to an event and 2/3 of the women are carrying one. There are so many more interesting, stylish bags at that price point, and it seems like the primary virtue of YSL is that it signals to people who don’t know anything about fashion that it’s expensive.

Anyone else with me? Whatever happened to fashion as an expression of individuality?

It sounds to me that you have a couple of these bags and are sad because you don't feel like you can wear them anymore lest someone think you're a follower and not the trend setter that you think you are. Move on to the next trend, then. Keep on wasting your money.

[Anonymous]

So. Many. Knockoffs.

I live in Baltimore and this is popular bag for people who live in very poor neighborhoods. All the logo brands are.

Logo bags aren't a sign that you are rich and have good taste.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So. Many. Knockoffs.

I live in Baltimore and this is popular bag for people who live in very poor neighborhoods. All the logo brands are.

Logo bags aren't a sign that you are rich and have good taste.

They never were

If a bag exists on the replica market, I simply don't buy it. Even Birkins are trash

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So. Many. Knockoffs.

I live in Baltimore and this is popular bag for people who live in very poor neighborhoods. All the logo brands are.

Logo bags aren't a sign that you are rich and have good taste.

They never were

If a bag exists on the replica market, I simply don't buy it. Even Birkins are trash

What do you carry?

[Anonymous]

I have the loulou puffer in cream. I like it but probably won’t get another when it wears out. It isn’t sturdy enough for me. I dislike Bottega Veneta for the same reason. I need bags to be stronger and more durable.