That’s the motto of the libs - they’re all for whatever doesn’t affect them. Equity in schools - they’re totes on board until there is talk of moving low income kids into their kids school. Then hells no - we paid a real estate premium to live here - keep them poors where they belong! |
This hasn’t been discussed enough. I see many deferrals/waitlisted with Fall 2025 options. It would be very interesting to see next year for haves (top schools) and have nots (less selective and regionals). |
what has Rs done for healthcare or college costs? |
I doubt that. Kids that need the $$$s can’t defer. Only full pay kids (or kids accepted to top schools that don’t care about FAFSA and have already given need awards) can defer. |
PP said "trying to figure out" |
+1 Zero-sum madness. |
I agree. I don't see a lot of deferrals. The kids will still go to school, even if it's not the super expensive one. |
From the article (emphasis mine): “Bipartisan efforts to streamline the Fafsa process have stretched back more than a decade, and a revamp was approved by Congress in 2020.” Nothing to do with student loan forgiveness. But as usual, don’t let facts get in the way. |
Idk. I know tons of kids deferring this year, who are different income levels. Way more than 2 years ago w oldest kid. |
Except that it was General Dynamics, a PRIVATE company, that built the new FAFSA platform. Neither democrats nor republicans had any direct influence over that, other than bureaucrats setting the specs. Tribalism is counterproductive. |
Huh? Meaning they have been accepted somewhere and taking a GAP year? These are kids that need to wait for FAFSA for financial awards? I will admit that I don't know the ins-and-outs of financial aid and merit tied to FAFSA, but I thought you lose all that if you defer. Again, if you are accepted to say Princeton and have been given tons of $$$s that is different...they will let anyone take a GAP year. |
| I feel bad for my kids and everyone applying next year. It's gotten so complicated with the end of TO, new messy digital testing, FAFSA changes...can't they just let those kids have some predictability? |
| I can't say I'm loosing sleep over fewer lower income students going to college. Those turning away from colleges are those who never really needed to go to college in the first place, racking up loans just to be a store manager afterwards struggling to pay back the loans. These aren't the kids who'd have used college to genuinely leap ahead economically, but spending a few years getting lost at a regional state school before dropping out and still ending up an assistant store manager. |
Absolutely! My very average DS has had tremendous success this year with college apps. 86% acceptance rate. Not sure if the SC decision had any positive impact (unlikely) but the trend towards "test-required but we'll pretend to be test-optional" definitely did. Also, the FAFSA numbers would be higher if that darn system worked. However, nothing prevents the government from just using CSS numbers, asking students to now submit CSS profile with 3 free submissions to get over this hump. |
That's laughable. I've used the old FAFSA and also submitted the new. Don't see much of a difference with 'process'. A few changes that would make a difference - consolidate CSS and FAFSA into one free app; don't require balances on the day of creation but specify a certain date, say Sept 30 so everyone has account statements as backup if necessary; |