2024 Election Thread

[Anonymous]

Yipee!

[Anonymous]

A bunch of Gazan protestors invaded Suozzi’s victory party. Had to be tackled off the stage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A bunch of Gazan protestors invaded Suozzi’s victory party. Had to be tackled off the stage.

Such losers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:58 to 42 right now for Suozzi. Polls had it as more like a four point lead

The most favorable poll for Suozzi had it at 4. Others were as little as 1. The final result will narrow some, but I bet it ends up with him winning by 10. If so, that’s a huge miss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Tom Suozzi can flip NY-3 buy winning George Santos’s seat.

With only 16% of votes in, he is leading by a good amount.

They’ve called it for Suozzi. Looks like it will be double digit blowout too.

Woot!!

Polls had this as a tight race. Looks like it’s another big polling miss in republican favor.

+1

[Anonymous]

Really good analysis of what's going on here. I would rather be a Dem than an R.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A bunch of Gazan protestors invaded Suozzi’s victory party. Had to be tackled off the stage.

these people need to get a life, and I'm very liberal. I spoke with a few while calling for the PA special election. They would complain about the candidate supporting gEnocIde and when I tried to explain State reps would have no impact, they just wouldn't listen. I'm referring to the privileged white people I spoke with. I know it's different for Arab Americans.

[Anonymous]

I don't think the GOP realizes how much their killing their own border bill will impact them this year. Add to it Dobbs, and well, November will be interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Starting with Special for PA House-140 which would have flipped State House back to GOP. This seat is in swingy Bucks County. The MAGA candidate got crushed.

❗️❗️❗️

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Tom Suozzi can flip NY-3 buy winning George Santos’s seat.

With only 16% of votes in, he is leading by a good amount.

They’ve called it for Suozzi. Looks like it will be double digit blowout too.

Huh. So all those news stories about it being next and neck were wrong?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Tom Suozzi can flip NY-3 buy winning George Santos’s seat.

With only 16% of votes in, he is leading by a good amount.

They’ve called it for Suozzi. Looks like it will be double digit blowout too.

Huh. So all those news stories about it being next and neck were wrong?

Shocked, shocked that the New York Post’s poll didn’t get anywhere near the target.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Tom Suozzi can flip NY-3 buy winning George Santos’s seat.

With only 16% of votes in, he is leading by a good amount.

They’ve called it for Suozzi. Looks like it will be double digit blowout too.

Huh. So all those news stories about it being next and neck were wrong?

Shocked, shocked that the New York Post’s poll didn’t get anywhere near the target.

Heck, even CNN was on the doom and gloom train:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/11/politics/new-york-democrats-special-election-3rd-district/index.html - New York Democrats are worried about Tuesday’s special election. They have good reason to be

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This. Can someone pls fire these old pointless “reporters”

cancelled my NYT subscription years ago due to their stupidity…wish I could cancel is everyday

[Anonymous]

That’s a bold strategy Cotton etc. etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That’s a bold strategy Cotton etc. etc.

Well at least the GOP are accepting the results. That’s why in Nov we must vote in numbers so large the GOP can’t try to cry foul.