The “pretty” sister in the Firth version really isn’t pretty. |
The dialogue in the Firth version is more accurate, and closer to the book.
The Knightly version has better scenery, music, costume, and chemistry. If only they could marry the two, but the film would be like 3.5 hours long. |
I'm the ardent admirer of Firth. Also 49. I think there are heaps of chemistry. |
She's pretty for 1813! |
That’s because Firth exudes something romantic in every film. But she just comes across as stiff. |
NP. Gen X here. I like Colin Firth but I agree the chemistry was much better in the Knightley/Macfadyen version. There was no chemistry in the BBC version. The BBC version was more historically accurate.
If I want to watch a reasonably accurate period drama I watch the BBC version. If I want to watch something with romance, chemistry, and a bit of fantasy, I watch the Knightley/Macfadyen version. |
No question. Colin Firth. |
Keira & Matthew hands down! I’ve recommended it to many people since it came out and everyone has enjoyed it. |
It’s distracting having Jane not be beautiful since everyone is always commenting on her beauty. |
The casting was wonderful. |
Firth/ehle
Kiera would have been a decent Emma but is too bubbly for that role |
Firth version hands down. The 2005 Kiera version is not very true to the book other than the general plot. And so much is not true to the period- like Kiera running around with her hair down? Chickens walking through the Bennett house? The Bennets were the Bingleys social superiors, they just didn’t have the income anymore.
The Firth version in my opinion had WAY more chemistry between Firth and Ehle! And it was so much more true to the book. Firth is what made the movie though. Agree that the Firth version’s Jane was not pretty enough for the role even though she played the part perfectly |
+ a million |
Agree. Did not like the KK version. And I don't find McFadyen handsome. Unable to appreciate anything else due to the pairing. |
Kiera version! My favorite movie. |