Opinions about AWDTSG site

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If men don’t act like creeps they don’t need to worry about being posted

Not true. Women are nuts too - and I do wonder if there are revenge posts (especially those posted anonymously)

Reading the posts - I understand how many women really do love “drama” - I generally don’t use that term because life is complicated and complex so drama is unavoidable - and I always swipe left if a dude on OLD claims he’s “drama-free” - but reading the posts, I can see that some women are kardashisn followers

This - the ability to post anonymously brings out the worst in people. For example, DCUM. Women on AWDTSG exaggerate and dramaticize the events of dates.

[Anonymous]

There’s also a weird Pollyanna-ish attitude of being appalled that men on apps are talking to multiple women (note: different than actual cheating!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There’s also a weird Pollyanna-ish attitude of being appalled that men on apps are talking to multiple women (note: different than actual cheating!)

And, it’s exactly what women do although men probably do it to a lesser extent because it’s harder for them to find prospects.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a man loses his job because of something on the site, it's because he is either a sexual predator, a domestic abuser or is lying about something very important and actionable. Nobody is getting fired for being a player or being an awkward dater.

Yes, the site can devolve into a bit of "he rejected me so he must be a bad guy" at times, but most people on there really try to discourage that. It is invaluable and helpful when it steers women away from men who have current wives, are abusers or have major substance issues. Wouldn't you want to know if the man you were meeting tonight has a wife? Or a serious criminal record? I would.

The man in the lawsuit was just “accused” of being a semi-failed player and not very cool. It’s just needless humiliation IMO.

Except now everyone knows he is a creepy loser, and we have all seen his picture. WTG dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP thank your lucky stars you don’t need to be in there. I am and the number of times a man is posted who’s supposedly exclusive or married but has several other girlfriends is insane. Men are giving women STDs and not divulging they know they’re contagious. There are men who have SA multiple posters. There are men who have stalked women.

It’s honestly terrifying

Women do the same. So many women are banging other men while married or in relationships. This is not confined to a single gender. My co-worker is frequent user of AM and has so many affairs.

Women are out here sexually assulting men? Doubt it happens much.

FYI, there are men's groups on FB too. Also, Discord groups where men share nudes they get.

[Anonymous]

I get why this could be a good website in theory, but the likelihood for people to abuse it is obvious. It makes me wonder about the true intentions of the people who started it.

This seems like an offshoot of OLD and hook up culture. When you are constantly going on dates with strangers you've met online, you need the additional protection. I get that. So maybe stop doing that because a defamation website seems like a bad fix for the problem.

[Anonymous]

The site started with good intentions but it's been largely overtaken by women who are single for a reason. The dating scene here is pretty bad but to lay blame entirely at the feet of men is a bit misguided when you have a site full of women asking for cyberstalking tips and refusing to go on coffee dates because of the wage gap.

[Anonymous]

I didn't hear about this until it randomly showed up in my Facebook feed. I've been married nearly 20 years so it wasn't a well targeted ad. I can't believe groups like this exist though I suppose there can be a good use for them if used properly.

[Anonymous]

How is this guy suing women for calling him clingy?? Does he have to prove he isnt clingy? Or how does that work

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP thank your lucky stars you don’t need to be in there. I am and the number of times a man is posted who’s supposedly exclusive or married but has several other girlfriends is insane. Men are giving women STDs and not divulging they know they’re contagious. There are men who have SA multiple posters. There are men who have stalked women.

It’s honestly terrifying

Women do the same. So many women are banging other men while married or in relationships. This is not confined to a single gender. My co-worker is frequent user of AM and has so many affairs.

Women are out here sexually assulting men? Doubt it happens much.

FYI, there are men's groups on FB too. Also, Discord groups where men share nudes they get.

You must not follow the news. Practically every day adult women are arrested for sexually assaulting children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a man loses his job because of something on the site, it's because he is either a sexual predator, a domestic abuser or is lying about something very important and actionable. Nobody is getting fired for being a player or being an awkward dater.

Yes, the site can devolve into a bit of "he rejected me so he must be a bad guy" at times, but most people on there really try to discourage that. It is invaluable and helpful when it steers women away from men who have current wives, are abusers or have major substance issues. Wouldn't you want to know if the man you were meeting tonight has a wife? Or a serious criminal record? I would.

The man in the lawsuit was just “accused” of being a semi-failed player and not very cool. It’s just needless humiliation IMO.

Except now everyone knows he is a creepy loser, and we have all seen his picture. WTG dummy.

There are some down sides to doxing someone and posting defamation like the above on the internet. Here are a few possibilities:

1. Nothing happens.
2. You get sued.
3. He really is a psycho, in which case when they find your naked body on the bottom of the Potomac after you've been half-eaten by crabs.
4. He isn't a psycho, but someone who is reads about the court case is, and becomes outraged, and gives you the Potomac treatment.

Why not just save yourself the potential trouble?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can men check to see if they are on it?

No, men are banned.

If you have friends, you sure can.

I was on there twice and once I was posted by a women I never even went on a date with as we were still talking. I got mostly good comments but someone misidentified me as someone else and I got piled on a by a bunch of women who didn't even know me and accused me of doing something this other guy allegedly did. One women did comment I was a jerk but then again she didn't look like her profile pics (she was much more overweight) and the pics she used were old so I wasn't not interested. So, I called her out and told her I'm not interested in high school gossip games.

Second time was because I just "couldn't be single" and they took a picture off my social media that had my kid and myself on it and posted it. I was sent the screenshots on that one to. I sent her the screenshots and told her to kick rocks. I got the "it's to protect women" speech. Oh yeah...really? I saw the comments it most certainly is not. Of course, she leaked my text conversation to the group in an effort to find out who it was that alerted me (was my sister).

There is a group on FB that posts screenshots of some of the groups and it's astounding what you see. As for me I won't use dating apps anymore really and if I do it's to hook up only.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a man loses his job because of something on the site, it's because he is either a sexual predator, a domestic abuser or is lying about something very important and actionable. Nobody is getting fired for being a player or being an awkward dater.

Yes, the site can devolve into a bit of "he rejected me so he must be a bad guy" at times, but most people on there really try to discourage that. It is invaluable and helpful when it steers women away from men who have current wives, are abusers or have major substance issues. Wouldn't you want to know if the man you were meeting tonight has a wife? Or a serious criminal record? I would.

The man in the lawsuit was just “accused” of being a semi-failed player and not very cool. It’s just needless humiliation IMO.

Except now everyone knows he is a creepy loser, and we have all seen his picture. WTG dummy.

There are some down sides to doxing someone and posting defamation like the above on the internet. Here are a few possibilities:

1. Nothing happens.
2. You get sued.
3. He really is a psycho, in which case when they find your naked body on the bottom of the Potomac after you've been half-eaten by crabs.
4. He isn't a psycho, but someone who is reads about the court case is, and becomes outraged, and gives you the Potomac treatment.

Why not just save yourself the potential trouble?

Hyperbole much?

What will probably happen? The guy finds out and dumps you as you deserve. Or he is a cheater and doesn't give a crap and will just continue being a womanizer anyways.

[Anonymous]

How is this guy suing women for calling him clingy?? Does he have to prove he isnt clingy? Or how does that work.

At trial, the person making the public assertion (i.e., the woman posting that he was clingy) must prove their assertion was true.

He (the plaintiff) will get the chance to search for evidence to impeach each woman's testimony.

If he is willing to spend the money, he can find information on them they most likely want to keep private.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

How is this guy suing women for calling him clingy?? Does he have to prove he isnt clingy? Or how does that work.

At trial, the person making the public assertion (i.e., the woman posting that he was clingy) must prove their assertion was true.

He (the plaintiff) will get the chance to search for evidence to impeach each woman's testimony.

If he is willing to spend the money, he can find information on them they most likely want to keep private.

Burden of proof is on the plaintiff (here - the guy), not the woman posting