Neverfull - cheesy/ suburban or classic?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Both |
Anonymous
| It’s a functional, neutral bag. I’d buy it used because I think they look better broken in. And I prefer the Damier pattern. |
Anonymous
| I always assume they’re fake and carried by wannabes |
Anonymous
| I am extremely basic and would never carry a bag that is covered in logos. The one that is less logo plastered is a bit more subtle but honestly just sends messages that I don’t wish to convey. But that is my opinion, and if others enjoy carrying them and can afford it, more power to them and Bernard Arnault. |
Anonymous
| The thing about the Neverfull is that people will make one of two assumptions about you: (1) You can't really afford luxury items and you've saved up for years to buy this one so people will think you're fancy or (2) It's fake and you want people to think you can afford it. |
Anonymous
| Gauche. |
Anonymous
| Ugh. The only LV tote I'd buy is the OnMySide because it doesn't have a pattern or logo. I think the Damier is so ugly. |
Anonymous
| Cliche. Damier is ugly and the logo is desperate. |
Anonymous
| Boring suburban basic. |
Anonymous
| Mine is 30 years old, damier ebene, classic to me. |
Anonymous
| What about the graceful? |
Anonymous
It’s the garish logos that are tacky, not the shape of the bag! |
Anonymous
Sadly, this is generally true. I see very few people who pull off an LV looking chic or elegant. It happens, but it’s unusual. |
Anonymous
op - this is sort of my gut, as a new yorker - that it feels a little basic/ cheesy. Not like - michael kors level. But not good. But at the same time I saw a woman with one the other day and she really pulled it off. Granted she was waspy (and I am a little edgier) |
Anonymous
still has the logos so same issue. |