For me, I would reframe this as “What is MY (as in the OP) risk tolerance around having a second child?” The age gap matters far less in the grand scheme than your ability to get pregnant a second time. The longer you wait the more likely it is that you will experience complications and/or have less time biologically to get pregnant if you experience multiple losses. This is the way that I think. I have three under five with 25 months between kids and had my kids between 31-35. I wanted three and I wanted to reduce the risk of age related complications or infertility complicating things. It’s chaotic at times but I work full time and we manage very well with a great nanny as well as tons of involvement from my husband. Think about your priorities and what would be most difficult for you in the long run and act accordingly to try to prevent that situation from occurring. |
PP is right. You’re an idiot. |
|
Whatever happens, as long as you have a healthy baby, you will be happy, OP.
There's a 5 year age gap between my children. We like that, because each child got individual attention as babies, and individual attention as high schoolers, which is non-negligible considering teens are hard to parent, and college admissions are absolutely insane! |
It really bother you that not everyone thinks and acts the exact way you want them to huh? Control issues? |
| I started trying at 18 months got pregnant right away. Lost the pregnancy at 15 weeks and so kicked off 2+ years of many more losses and no happy story to tell. So, I would try and hope with the idea that life often kicks you in the gut. |