Scattergram data

[Anonymous]

Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

Not for the two high schools I've seen Naviance for. It's possible that there's some Naviance package out there that includes this option, but I'd think you'd be able to tell just by looking at the scattergram page if there were some option to see that information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depends on the high school. Often it isn't clear how far back the scattergram data goes.

Does your school not show the bar graphs by year? Which MCPS school?

It shows the bar graphs by year, and those go back to 2018, but if you add all those acceptances (for highly selective schools) up, there are far fewer than what I see on the scatterplot. Conversely, there are far more rejections on the bar graph than on the scatterplot. I am wondering if they included some older acceptances and to kind of fill out the plot and pared rejections to keep it legible? It just doesn't add up. And, I know that pre '21 data isn't very helpful, but pre '17 data is really useless!

The bar graph only shows acceptances and non-acceptances, which isn’t necessarily rejection and often isn’t. You may see decision unknown on scatterplot - like if kid withdrew application after being accepted ED or EA or was waitlisted into summer (that’s a lot of kids) and hence high school doesn’t have that info of final outcome for that application.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Depends on the high school. Often it isn't clear how far back the scattergram data goes.

Does your school not show the bar graphs by year? Which MCPS school?

It shows the bar graphs by year, and those go back to 2018, but if you add all those acceptances (for highly selective schools) up, there are far fewer than what I see on the scatterplot. Conversely, there are far more rejections on the bar graph than on the scatterplot. I am wondering if they included some older acceptances and to kind of fill out the plot and pared rejections to keep it legible? It just doesn't add up. And, I know that pre '21 data isn't very helpful, but pre '17 data is really useless!

The bar graph only shows acceptances and non-acceptances, which isn’t necessarily rejection and often isn’t. You may see decision unknown on scatterplot - like if kid withdrew application after being accepted ED or EA or was waitlisted into summer (that’s a lot of kids) and hence high school doesn’t have that info of final outcome for that application.

Hmm. Good point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

You'd think there'd be TO apps for 21, 22 and 23, but when I toggle to that nothing shows up. Maybe logging them as such is a new data feature starting this year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

You'd think there'd be TO apps for 21, 22 and 23, but when I toggle to that nothing shows up. Maybe logging them as such is a new data feature starting this year.

2023 is last year in Naviance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

You'd think there'd be TO apps for 21, 22 and 23, but when I toggle to that nothing shows up. Maybe logging them as such is a new data feature starting this year.

2023 is last year in Naviance.

Yes, that's a given. The point was that maybe they added a new drop down feature this year but when the previous TO years' data were imported, that didn't register because it wasn't an option in the system then. This is just a guess, but I can't figure another reason why TO would register nothing. Some of the test scores were very unlikely to be admissions had they been reported. Of course, the data could also be older than what's on the bar graph.

It's not very transparent!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Our school uses SCOIR. In Scoir you can select the years you want to see.

I looked at just last year's acceptances and then I backed out a few more years.

I feel so much has changed historical data is pretty much irrelevant. You just want the last 2-3 years MAX.

Our school uses SCOIR and I am not sure scattergram is useful. I had read somewhere that it is self reported as I looked at some popular schools and tbe numbers of kids enrolling doesn’t line up. Also doesn’t include the kids who were TO which is a lot so a bit frustrating. Finally our school doesn’t have weighting so you can’t tell kids who took a hard schedule vs easy and this means a lot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

You'd think there'd be TO apps for 21, 22 and 23, but when I toggle to that nothing shows up. Maybe logging them as such is a new data feature starting this year.

2023 is last year in Naviance.

Yes, that's a given. The point was that maybe they added a new drop down feature this year but when the previous TO years' data were imported, that didn't register because it wasn't an option in the system then. This is just a guess, but I can't figure another reason why TO would register nothing. Some of the test scores were very unlikely to be admissions had they been reported. Of course, the data could also be older than what's on the bar graph.

It's not very transparent!

Our MCPS school Naviance shows TO applications for some schools. Including UMD. I’m assuming it’s 2023 only based on limited number of applicants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

You'd think there'd be TO apps for 21, 22 and 23, but when I toggle to that nothing shows up. Maybe logging them as such is a new data feature starting this year.

2023 is last year in Naviance.

Yes, that's a given. The point was that maybe they added a new drop down feature this year but when the previous TO years' data were imported, that didn't register because it wasn't an option in the system then. This is just a guess, but I can't figure another reason why TO would register nothing. Some of the test scores were very unlikely to be admissions had they been reported. Of course, the data could also be older than what's on the bar graph.

It's not very transparent!

Our MCPS school Naviance shows TO applications for some schools. Including UMD. I’m assuming it’s 2023 only based on limited number of applicants.

Interesting. Ours shows nothing with TO selected for umd. I guess it correlates more directly to individual school management than I thought.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, is there anyway to know which scattergram data point is from which year? I wish the scattergram corresponded more clearly to the bar graph.

No. Unless the Test Optional data turns out to be only 2023. For our school, I’m guessing it’s only 2023 but haven’t received confirmation yet.

You'd think there'd be TO apps for 21, 22 and 23, but when I toggle to that nothing shows up. Maybe logging them as such is a new data feature starting this year.

2023 is last year in Naviance.

Yes, that's a given. The point was that maybe they added a new drop down feature this year but when the previous TO years' data were imported, that didn't register because it wasn't an option in the system then. This is just a guess, but I can't figure another reason why TO would register nothing. Some of the test scores were very unlikely to be admissions had they been reported. Of course, the data could also be older than what's on the bar graph.

It's not very transparent!

Our MCPS school Naviance shows TO applications for some schools. Including UMD. I’m assuming it’s 2023 only based on limited number of applicants.

Interesting. Ours shows nothing with TO selected for umd. I guess it correlates more directly to individual school management than I thought.

They may still be loading data. I feel like there’s still a lot missing for our school.

[Anonymous]

So apparently, our school includes data back to 2012 on the scattergram! Yikes. Other mcps parents, you may want to check with your career counselor person at school to see how far back yours go.

I am just going yo assume that the recent admits are the ones with the highest data points I guess.