How would republicans have reacted if the Trump criminal indictments 1&2 had been about Obama instead?

[Anonymous]

If Obama had tried to stage a violent coup to remain in office, I would’ve been OK with him getting indicted. The guy is a Boy Scout compared to trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think a key difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans are infinitely more apt to resort to violence.

I am proud that in the face of the most corrupt and incompetent president we have ever had, the democratic party is using the proper legal channels and is not out there trying to physically harm the accused and shameless orange-skinned grifter.

January 6 will not wear well for the republican party. They showed us who they were.

I feel like most Americans outside of the DC metro area do not care about Jan. 6th.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After the Benghazi hearings, Clinton server, the Obama tan suit and all the racist accusations leveled against President Obama, how would republicans have reacted if the porn star payoff state criminal indictment and the federal criminal indictment for absconding with national security top secret documents and disseminating that information had been accusations leveled against President Obama?

In my view r's would have been humping the allegations like a dog in heat 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

How do you think r's would have debased themselves?

You mean the way Democrats are currently doing? Oh.

LOL! What are, six years old?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:After the Benghazi hearings, Clinton server, the Obama tan suit and all the racist accusations leveled against President Obama, how would republicans have reacted if the porn star payoff state criminal indictment and the federal criminal indictment for absconding with national security top secret documents and disseminating that information had been accusations leveled against President Obama?

In my view r's would have been humping the allegations like a dog in heat 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

How do you think r's would have debased themselves?

You mean the way Democrats are currently doing? Oh.

LOL! What are you, six years old?

GAAAH! I hate typos!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a key difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans are infinitely more apt to resort to violence.

I am proud that in the face of the most corrupt and incompetent president we have ever had, the democratic party is using the proper legal channels and is not out there trying to physically harm the accused and shameless orange-skinned grifter.

January 6 will not wear well for the republican party. They showed us who they were.

I feel like most Americans outside of the DC metro area do not care about Jan. 6th.

You probably imbibe fox [not] news 24/7. Most of the country and nearly all of the world is aghast that the leading power in the world was temporarily led by a rapist, criminal and all around imbecile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a key difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans are infinitely more apt to resort to violence.

I am proud that in the face of the most corrupt and incompetent president we have ever had, the democratic party is using the proper legal channels and is not out there trying to physically harm the accused and shameless orange-skinned grifter.

January 6 will not wear well for the republican party. They showed us who they were.

Many Republicans would compare the minority of the BLM protestors who were violent to the "normal tourist visit" on January 6.

Until they were shown that the people who turned those protests violent were generally right wingers. Plenty of links shared in this forum to back that up.

[Anonymous]

They would have shown up for a January 6-like assault on the WH wearing white pointed hats and sheets to destroy our government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If this had been Obama, and he had lost re-election and was trying to win the Democratic nomination again, his political career would be completely and totally finished. EVERYONE in the mainstream media would compare Obama to Robert Hanssen, Aldrich Ames, and Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. No one would stand up for him. Republicans wouldn’t really attack him because it would be pointless. But they would use Obama to smear the entire Democratic Party, and especially the front runner for the nomination, whomever that might be. The mainstream media would place a halo on the head of the Republican front runner. They would demand that the Democratic front runner disavow Obama in the strongest possible terms, but would never be satisfied. The Democratic Party would completely abandon Obama and he would quickly drop out.

Nonsense. The Republicans would be all over attacking Obama, and the liberal media would be defending him. They would be talking about classified documents vs documents marked classified, as Hillary did. And they would be mentioning national defense information vs classified material. And talking about Trump disclosing classified material to Russia and a double standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a key difference between republicans and democrats is that republicans are infinitely more apt to resort to violence.

I am proud that in the face of the most corrupt and incompetent president we have ever had, the democratic party is using the proper legal channels and is not out there trying to physically harm the accused and shameless orange-skinned grifter.

January 6 will not wear well for the republican party. They showed us who they were.

It's unfortunate how republicans use the stupid and desperate in their ranks to commit violence on their behalf.

You mean the base?

BWAHAHA!!
So true.

[Anonymous]

tucker carlson would have really bankrupted fox news with his white supremacist lies.