AAP appeal emails have been sent

[Anonymous]

Pour yourself a drink and try next year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable

Sorry to hear that. It shall not happen as you paid them to do the job. Maybe you can contact the director of the program?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable

Wow. That’s hard. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Thank God. In!

[Anonymous]

DC got in. Scores were lower than what is being posted here. WISC 132.

McLean pyramid.

So happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable

That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.

[Anonymous]

What ? Bargain shop? Is it better to do a private test?

[Anonymous]

My child got a very generic form letter indicating he was eligible for Level II Subject Specific Advanced Differentiation in all areas of learning. So I sent an email questioning why he wasn't just given Level III services. Low and behold, two days later I received the same generic form letter indicating my child is now going to receive Level III services at our local elementary school. Our AART is worthless, IMO.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable

That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.

What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?

[Anonymous]

Gmu is recommended by the county. But one of the people I know did have negative experiences with them. Her kid’s examiner seems don’t like immigrants family

[Anonymous]

Aren't the tests at GMU administered by grad students? Isn't that why it's cheaper?

[Anonymous]

Anyone in on appeal from the Chantilly pyramid?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My child got a very generic form letter indicating he was eligible for Level II Subject Specific Advanced Differentiation in all areas of learning. So I sent an email questioning why he wasn't just given Level III services. Lo and behold, two days later I received the same generic form letter indicating my child is now going to receive Level III services at our local elementary school. Our AART is worthless, IMO.

We also got a Level II letter. Any suggestions for how to have them consider our child for Level III? Struggling with communicating with our AART, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Aren't the tests at GMU administered by grad students? Isn't that why it's cheaper?

Not always.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did not get in. Screwed by GMU. Could not submit wisc because GMU examiner was very unprofessional and intentionally gave extreme low score. Even kiddo got high on cogat and nnat. Unbelievable

That’s what you get for being cheap. Can’t bargain shop with the Wisc test.

What do you mean cheap? So GMU charges less and provides less quality service? Any data points?

I'm sure that person is trolling. GMU is recommended by FCPS and supposedly they are more unbiased than going to a private psychologist.