Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not really that great of an ad. What does it mean that the incumbent didn't listen to this crime victim? Super vague and unhelpful. Would have been better if the ad said that the incumbent advocated for a certain light sentence, and that type of sentence is something he will not allow if he is elected.
OP here. This far out from Election Day Josh technically couldn't really have her say that, because the judge imposed a lesser sentence than the incumbent Commonwealth's Attorney sought. Better to have the imagery, music, and the person bashing the Soros stooge so that people THINK she pushed for the lesser sentence. Let them make the connection in their own minds. Let the ad fly around Facebook and Twitter and Telegram and NextDoor and 'Gram so that she has to play whack-a-mole. Then a couple of days before Election Day say the incumbent prosecutor wanted the weak sentence before she has a chance to respond.
You can debate but it's checkmate. You have an attractive older white woman mourning the loss of a clean-cut W-L athlete, and blaming the Iranian incumbent for not being solicitous enough to them for her taste. All with really dark imagery and music when Parisa herself is discussed. That moves people and lets them make their choices. Parisa can only get liberals. Josh can get people who want better reform, and people who want to see our police allowed to protect us and wall off Arlington from DC the way they want to do it. Two groups beats one. Josh wins handily.