Maryland house bill 131 goes into effect without moor’s signature

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is uninformed alarmism.

The Democrats in Maryland made bestiality a felony in 2019. Bestiality is covered under a different part of the criminal code (10-606). This was an obsolete part of the code that could have been used to bust someone for getting a bj from their wife.

so why didn’t moore sign it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is uninformed alarmism.

The Democrats in Maryland made bestiality a felony in 2019. Bestiality is covered under a different part of the criminal code (10-606). This was an obsolete part of the code that could have been used to bust someone for getting a bj from their wife.

Probably, but then why didn’t specifically say animals? The way I read it, it sounds disgusting.

[Anonymous]

You are full of shit. 10-606 is not a bestiality law it is an anti animal cruelty law .

[Anonymous]

10-606 isn’t a bestiality law and the penalty for violating it is much smaller than was in the bestiality law they repealed

[Anonymous]

So why didn’t they just take the another person part out of 3-322

They legalized bestiality while legalizing oral and anal sex even though repealing the law was unecessary due to Supreme Court precedent . They legalized bestiality and moore didn’t want his name on this so he didn’t sign it into law

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So why didn’t they just take the another person part out of 3-322

They legalized bestiality while legalizing oral and anal sex even though repealing the law was unecessary due to Supreme Court precedent . They legalized bestiality and moore didn’t want his name on this so he didn’t sign it into law

We've heard that before, and we know how it turns out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So why didn’t they just take the another person part out of 3-322

They legalized bestiality while legalizing oral and anal sex even though repealing the law was unecessary due to Supreme Court precedent . They legalized bestiality and moore didn’t want his name on this so he didn’t sign it into law

We've heard that before, and we know how it turns out.

so why did they do it in a way that legalized bestiality ?

[Anonymous]

Also how is that law homophobic? It applies to heterosexual conduct too

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So why didn’t they just take the another person part out of 3-322

They legalized bestiality while legalizing oral and anal sex even though repealing the law was unecessary due to Supreme Court precedent . They legalized bestiality and moore didn’t want his name on this so he didn’t sign it into law

We've heard that before, and we know how it turns out.

so why did they do it in a way that legalized bestiality ?

If you sincerely want to know the answer to your question, then go watch the committee hearings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am more interested as to why he didn't sign Crutchfield's cannabis car search bill.

Maybe he knows it's going to lead to a blood bath this summer, but wasn't courageous enough to veto it.

Didn’t want his name on a bill that in effect legalized driving while high

"I drive more carefully when I am high."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am more interested as to why he didn't sign Crutchfield's cannabis car search bill.

Maybe he knows it's going to lead to a blood bath this summer, but wasn't courageous enough to veto it.

Didn’t want his name on a bill that in effect legalized driving while high

"I drive more carefully when I am high."

Maryland drivers, in a nutshell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am more interested as to why he didn't sign Crutchfield's cannabis car search bill.

Maybe he knows it's going to lead to a blood bath this summer, but wasn't courageous enough to veto it.

Didn’t want his name on a bill that in effect legalized driving while high

"I drive more carefully when I am high."

Maryland drivers, in a nutshell.

I was driving from Frederick to Rockville today and I saw a guy in a blue bmw passing people on the shoulder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am more interested as to why he didn't sign Crutchfield's cannabis car search bill.

Maybe he knows it's going to lead to a blood bath this summer, but wasn't courageous enough to veto it.

Didn’t want his name on a bill that in effect legalized driving while high

"I drive more carefully when I am high."

Maryland drivers, in a nutshell.

Apparently you have never experienced the Kamikaze Teslas of the Dulles Toll Road.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is uninformed alarmism.

The Democrats in Maryland made bestiality a felony in 2019. Bestiality is covered under a different part of the criminal code (10-606). This was an obsolete part of the code that could have been used to bust someone for getting a bj from their wife.

so why didn’t moore sign it?

Moore wasn't governor in 2019

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are full of shit. 10-606 is not a bestiality law it is an anti animal cruelty law .

You must be just searching for 10-606 and not paying attention to which year's version. The law was updated in 2019. I don't feel like pulling the actual statute up from the MD leg page so this google result that has the accurate law should be enough.

https://codes.findlaw.com/md/criminal-law/md-code-crim-law-sect-10-606/