Sure I get it. Different preferences for different people. |
| I've always wondered why La Quinta gives free continental breakfast, free coffee, and free internet. But Ritz Carlton charges for all of that, plus makes you pay a $15-20 resort fee. Why?! You're already paying 4x more for the room, why isn't internet free? |
|
As with EVERYTHING - there's those that are worth it and those that aren't. Some luxury hotels are in fact luxurious. I stay there. I have also stayed in your normal boutique hotel before too and loved the experience.
Typically speaking, staying at Rosewood and Amara hotels are indeed luxurious because not only is the room just beautiful, it is also clean. The hotel itself will be a sight to behold. If you are truly not impressed with Viceroy's Sugar Beach St. Lucia or Rosewoord Little Dix Bay, I am not sure what to tell you. I've stayed in both and OMG - it's awesome. My definition of luxurious is typically boutique places where you can't get x amount of points for staying cause they don't need to give you them! T here's also something called value. I don't think people really understand value - for a price difference of $300, you get the same value but for $500-600/difference you may not get the same value. So, while I wouldn't shell out for a $700/night place, I would shell out for $1000/night place. But in general, you are correct - there's not a whole lot of difference between places that are $200 rooms at the same level of hotel brand. Unless you are staying in Motel 8 which may have bedbugs, your typical room is going to be fine. I've stayed in places that are considered "luxury" but really aren't so again, note my first sentence. Not every $1000/night place will be luxury so your blanket sentence is wrong. Personally, I don't stay at hotels when I can choose Airbnb/VRBO because I have a family. But you know, these luxurious places are going to be $1300-1600/night and at these prices, there is a difference baby! |
Do you think I care about free breakfast when I can shell out $1000/night for a room?? If I'm Ritz, I'm not catering to you. I'm catering to me. ROFL. Now I am with you on resort fees but there's a bunch of regular hotels that also tack on stupid resort fees too, that is totally arbitrary and not just at fancy places. Typically, even at the top tier places however, you can get online for free. You just don't get the free breakfast and all from your Homewood. But you get other stuff like if you go to Seasons and have kids, they really cater to them. |
The all inclusive mentality and viewing that as a selling point is typically seen as more low end although some more luxury all inclusive options are popping up in resort areas. |
| For us, its more about location where we are sightseeing, hotels in prime locations tend to be expensive and often luxurious. We stayed at London Marriott county hall, and with two kids needed a family room (~1K a night) but so easy to get to a lot of attractions, overlooking river Thames and since husband was an elite member, waived off breakfast fees for us and kids. |
Random, what do you do for work? |
| I haven’t stayed at Ritz-level luxury, but I did stay in a hotel that was about twice what I would usually pay in a big city (600 instead of 300) and it definitely was not worth it at all. The only difference was the personal attention (concierge/clerks knowing your name, etc) but that’s not worth $300! Location was also a bit better, but not $300 better. Room was not better at all. |
Where are you finding JWs for that low price $350?? Unheard of these days. Double that. |
I mean, it’s not hard to grasp what luxury resort hotels have to offer. But DC, NYC and Boston all have 4 Seasons that will run you $1300/night. What’s the point of that? |
Why do you care?? FTR, Residence Inn-Amelia Island doesn’t have a beach and has a teensy little pool and hot tub area. No restaurant onsite, and it’s located quite a distance from the main drag. Perfectly fine place to stay (stayed there must once!), but not comparable at all to the Ritz or Omni on AI. |
| *must = myself |
Just curious about other perspectives. Full disclosure, we own a house there - and have no issues going out for dinner or to a public beach. I guess I didn't realize people see hotels as a destination in and of themselves. Seems...restrictive. That's all! |
| I don’t understand the focus on room service. Before doordash and the like, sure, but now you have far better choices available to you faster and cheaper than whatever the hotel would serve you. |
| Ummm, cleaning happens daily, room service menus are back to being fully populated, spas and pools are open. The entire premise of the post is false. |