Agree |
| <25yo. I had my first at 29/30 in NYC and felt like an outlier as a young mom there. Jokes on me because now I’m having another at 42yo. So l guess I get to experience the modern umc versions of both. |
| I had mine at 21 and I was too young |
|
For me, 26 or younger.
In DC I think you can get called a young mom if you are about 30 or younger. Same in places like NY. In the vast majority of the US I don’t think people consider someone a young mom unless they are like 23 or younger though. Maybe even less… The median age of motherhood just went from 26/27 (depending on what source you look at) to 30 in the last few years. Big jump! |
| 26 or younger |
+1 |
Lol, I had my kids in my mid/late 20's and anyone 40 or older seemed like a grandma to me! |
| I had my first at 28 and was the first in my DC peer group. People out and about asked me if I was my child’s nanny. I always looked pretty young, though, and my little one had blond hair (it is now brown) and my hair is dark brown/almost black. |
| 25-26 or younger. But between 22-25 does not seem too young if they are stable financially and socially. I mean I just consider it young but not that they were too young/should’ve waited. |
| Even in Utah, where one of my parents is from, the age of parents has gone up and people have smaller families. I would say that among the college educated, before you graduate college is considered young. If you don’t do college, I think before 20 is considered young. You figure that you have to graduate high school, plan a wedding and take the necessary steps, and then get pregnant and be pregnant for 9 months. |
| I had my one and only (oops baby) at 26. I knew no one in my circle from high school, college, or grad school who had a child at that age. |
| My sister had a child at 21. This was exceptionally young even in our hometown in the rust belt. To her credit she’s done a really good job parenting. |
|
My ILs were 20 and 22 when DH was born.
That’s young! |
| A woman under 25. |
50 years ago it was not. |