Wapo endorsements

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

Sure, then let's bring in some Nazis for diversity. You're a real serious debater.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

If you pay attention to local politics, you might find the Post ed board’s positions on those issues are much more in line with your conservative politics than they are on national affairs. They are not conservative on national politics, no, but their local stances are very different.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

If you pay attention to local politics, you might find the Post ed board’s positions on those issues are much more in line with your conservative politics than they are on national affairs. They are not conservative on national politics, no, but their local stances are very different.

The Washington Post Editorial Board is extremely consistent: foreign policy hawk, socially liberal and fiscally conservative within a progressive taxation framework. It’s basically the same politics as nationally popular center-left liberalism that you see from Obama, the Clintons or Nancy Pelosi.

[Anonymous]

Fruminland obsessed with an endorsement they say is meaningless.

Endorsement also says Frumin is the “likely winner”. I guess they disagree with that too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fruminland obsessed with an endorsement they say is meaningless.

Endorsement also says Frumin is the “likely winner”. I guess they disagree with that too!

Really? How many times did the Republican note the endorsement in last night's debate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fruminland obsessed with an endorsement they say is meaningless.

Endorsement also says Frumin is the “likely winner”. I guess they disagree with that too!

Really? How many times did the Republican note the endorsement in last night's debate?

About as many times as Frumin

[Anonymous]

False.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

Sure, then let's bring in some Nazis for diversity. You're a real serious debater.

Equating a Jewish DC Republican with the Nazis on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar is a special kind of crazy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

Sure, then let's bring in some Nazis for diversity. You're a real serious debater.

Equating a Jewish DC Republican with the Nazis on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar is a special kind of crazy.

Crazy would not be the first word that comes to my mouth. Gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

Sure, then let's bring in some Nazis for diversity. You're a real serious debater.

Equating a Jewish DC Republican with the Nazis on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar is a special kind of crazy.

Conservatives don't respect my religious liberty any day of the year, so excuse me if I don't care about your faux outrage.

[Anonymous]

Krucoff joined the republican party AFTER 1/6. He was an independent before that. I have yet to hear him repudiate the insurrection or Trumpism. I have yet to hear him claim he is pro-choice.

As far as I am concerned, he wants to restrict my rights and his rhetoric around vouchers is quite the dog whistle as well.

He is a non-starter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

Sure, then let's bring in some Nazis for diversity. You're a real serious debater.

They were here on Jan 6th, 2021. They were also here on Nov 14th, 2020. I protested on both days with other DC residents and "met" them. I'd be happy if they stayed away from now on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know you are far left if you call the Posts Editiorial Board conservative.

I am. So? Much of DC is. If you want conservative politics then what are you doing here?

So diversity isn’t our strength?

Sure, then let's bring in some Nazis for diversity. You're a real serious debater.

Equating a Jewish DC Republican with the Nazis on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar is a special kind of crazy.

That is not what the PP did, though.