I heard there was a basement opening at Initech. Bring your own stapler. |
Next to a filing cabinet doing work. Like…why would anyone pay for that otherwise. Though I suppose there are feds who just watch for disasters on rotation. |
Yep. Just got one of these jobs—hallelujah—at $80k. OP, not sure of the transferability of your degrees/experience, but look for things like policy analyst, legislative analyst, research analyst, etc. I’m coming from 20+ years of people-intensive work and dreaming of a quiet little file cabinet myself. As far as I can tell, new job is 30% research, 30% writing, 30% tracking legislation and 10% peopling. I could not be happier and am gladly giving up the extra $20k that came from managing people, collaboration, and public interface. |
| I hear you! Working with other people is just exhausting. People are just angry and extremely sensitive these days. I would love to just sit in a room and research stuff and provide write-ups for others. |
Sounds like a dream. What type of employer is this — think tank? Trade org? |
Ha! I thought of Office Space as well. |
LOL — I’ve been in intel in the public and private sector for 10 years. It’s highly collaborative when done well. |
Okay but what about the people who just monitor content or do situational analysis? |
Not sure what you’re referring to. There’s no such thing as an intel job where you never interact with other people. |
| Patent examiner. |
| sure... you can be a IT network engineer. |
|
Patent examiner.
|
Nah, this requires negotiation when the writer fights back. |
I have a career as an intel analyst and run the analysis for my unit. If you want to be an effective analyst, you collaborate frequently with a wide variety of people. Our lower performing analysts still collaborate fairly frequently, but with fewer people (they have a smaller professional networks). To do well in intel, you need to provide something others need and also know who has what you need. It’s a highly relationship-driven position. |
Not if you do technical writing. |