+1000 |
The obvious reason for the statutes put in in the early part of the 1900s was not in reaction to desegregation or the civil rights movement. You're conflating two different motivations. |
Yeah - sure. Early 1900s with the Klan at their hayday? Yeah - you are right - totally different motivations
|
| Thankfully LoCo seems to be having a board election this year or in the coming years, likely allowing for Republicans to regain the majority in the county. Time to put a halt to all this nonsense. |
NP here, thinking about moving to Fauquier in the near future, is it really that southern? |
|
The nazis based their racial purity and segregation laws on those state laws in the South that imposed Jim Crow.
Sorry, but that’s a sh#t legacy when the nazis admire you |
I think that you are actually correct to question such a triumphant narrative. There is still a lot of work to be done before we can truly become an amazing, unified country. |
lol "culture" |
Demonizing current Southerners ain't it. Taking down statues is one thing, wanting to kick out states or people is another. There's a lot of work to do. I don't see many people trying to do any of it. |
Well gosh! You've raised a lot of questions here. Where are you getting the idea that the widespread usage of venerating confederates "has NEVER been a problem for the past century to half century"? And what makes you think that slavery and segregation was an "unarguable stance that was unanimous among ALL politicians"? Those are some sweepingly incorrect generalizations. Do you have any support for them? As to your last question, I'm glad that these changes are finally happening. I think, to quote you, that "it's a great change". It gives me a modicum of hope to see significant steps forward that celebrate LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. I'd be happy to come up with a few contemporary documents refuting your assertions -- if you're interested. https://lincolnquakers.com/2020/11/04/united-on-the-right-side-of-history-john-c-underwood-and-samuel-m-janney/ |
Used to live there years ago, my neighbors had confederate flags porched on their flag poles if that tells you anything. |
|
I don’t really care about removing the names except fir the fact that it drives cons crazy and enrages them.
That’s really the only reason I support it. |
|
All human beings are disappointing. Sometimes it just takes longer to discover why... We already know this and should just stop naming things after people.
Food and Leisure are the way to go! Living at the corner of Milkshake Rd & Sudoku Ln sounds nice |
Do you imagine the slaves thought slavery was fine? That if was just part of the culture and not something horrific? Did they not blame white southerners? Of course they knew it was wrong. So did abolitionists at the time. The "era" is no defense because LOTS of people in that era knew slavery was wrong. The fact you think it was culturally okay at that time us exactly why we need to take down statues and rename public buildings that honor those people. Plus, no kid should have to go to school in a building named after someone who thought she was property. Hilarious that OP's main objection is to having to learn new names. Heaven forbid you have to extend yourself to learn something new! But, somehow, I suspect you weren't this mad when the Fairfax County Parkway got a new route number. |
DP. See, this here's your problem. There are kids today, and there are people in the past. All of the people in this nation's history, they all made this country as it is today, for better or worse. But they are not here today. Whatever they thought or did, they thought or did it then. We cannot change it, and it cannot change us. You are saying that the people of today are responsible for the past. But that's not true. People today can learn from the past, or can ignore it. But no one here today is responsible for whatever people did in the past, no one today bears the blame for what people did in the past. |