Livestreamed forum on SROs this evening - My MC Media

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

+1 to all of this. SROs aren’t event paid through MCPS.

To the “SROs won’t solve anything” poster above, I recommend you watch the recording of last night’s forum. You’ll hear a lot about what SROs have done and what they can do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Yes, the PP is correct. Violence was about the same as any year. The pro-SRO posters wanted to make it seem worse because it was aligned with their political agenda but there's no evidence to support this.



Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

+1 to all of this. SROs aren’t event paid through MCPS.

To the “SROs won’t solve anything” poster above, I recommend you watch the recording of last night’s forum. You’ll hear a lot about what SROs have done and what they can do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

+1 to all of this. SROs aren’t event paid through MCPS.

To the “SROs won’t solve anything” poster above, I recommend you watch the recording of last night’s forum. You’ll hear a lot about what SROs have done and what they can do.

Yes, the PP is correct. Violence was about the same as any year. The pro-SRO posters wanted to make it seem worse because it was aligned with their political agenda but there's no evidence to support this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

Violence is up everywhere so that is not a measurement for SRO success/failure. But pre 2020’s SROs did not decrease violence.

There is no data to back your assertion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

+1 to all of this. SROs aren’t event paid through MCPS.

To the “SROs won’t solve anything” poster above, I recommend you watch the recording of last night’s forum. You’ll hear a lot about what SROs have done and what they can do.

Yes, the PP is correct. Violence was about the same as any year. The pro-SRO posters wanted to make it seem worse because it was aligned with their political agenda but there's no evidence to support this.

The "political agenda" is to keep kids safe. You make it sound like it's a bad thing.

Kids can't learn if they are constantly in fear. They can't close the achievement gap. And guess who's getting hurt the most? Black and brown kids. Mostly AA boys. According to the mid year stats, and remember, there are fewer kids enrolled this year:

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (already surpassed last full year)
Rape 13 4 13 (already equalled last full year)
Threats 13 3 11 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Weapons 54 49 67 (already surpassed last full year)

These don't count assaults that are not reported to police because they aren't deemed as severe (if a nurse can treat injuries on site, it doesn't get reported to police). https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/Resources/Files/agenda/cm/2022/20220209/20220209_ECPS1.pdf

A male, African American high school student is 200 times more likely to be assaulted than arrested in school. Mid-year, five AA students had been arrested. And yet national data shows 3% of AA students are violently victimized at school Students ages 12-18 are actually less safe, statstically, at school than elsewhere in the community.

https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/report-indicators-school-crime-and-safety-2020#:~:text=In%202019%2C%20students%20ages%2012,bullied%20in%202009%20(28%25).

Everyone is touting mental health and wellness centers as solutions. The schools need wellness centers, but they generally help with things like suicide threats, etc. People with mental health challenges are far more likely to be victimized than to ever commit violence. We can demonize them all we want, but the truth is, mental health services alone is not our way out of the violence.

The schools ALSO need an evidence-based SRO program with a strong MOU that administration actually oversees and enforces, to ensure police provide the benefit of safety without causing the harm of interfering with student discipline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

+1 to all of this. SROs aren’t event paid through MCPS.

To the “SROs won’t solve anything” poster above, I recommend you watch the recording of last night’s forum. You’ll hear a lot about what SROs have done and what they can do.

Yes, the PP is correct. Violence was about the same as any year. The pro-SRO posters wanted to make it seem worse because it was aligned with their political agenda but there's no evidence to support this.

The "political agenda" is to keep kids safe. You make it sound like it's a bad thing.

Kids can't learn if they are constantly in fear. They can't close the achievement gap. And guess who's getting hurt the most? Black and brown kids. Mostly AA boys. According to the mid year stats, and remember, there are fewer kids enrolled this year:

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (already surpassed last full year)
Rape 13 4 13 (already equalled last full year)
Threats 13 3 11 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Weapons 54 49 67 (already surpassed last full year)

These don't count assaults that are not reported to police because they aren't deemed as severe (if a nurse can treat injuries on site, it doesn't get reported to police). https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/Resources/Files/agenda/cm/2022/20220209/20220209_ECPS1.pdf

A male, African American high school student is 200 times more likely to be assaulted than arrested in school. Mid-year, five AA students had been arrested. And yet national data shows 3% of AA students are violently victimized at school Students ages 12-18 are actually less safe, statstically, at school than elsewhere in the community.

https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/report-indicators-school-crime-and-safety-2020#:~:text=In%202019%2C%20students%20ages%2012,bullied%20in%202009%20(28%25).

Everyone is touting mental health and wellness centers as solutions. The schools need wellness centers, but they generally help with things like suicide threats, etc. People with mental health challenges are far more likely to be victimized than to ever commit violence. We can demonize them all we want, but the truth is, mental health services alone is not our way out of the violence.

The schools ALSO need an evidence-based SRO program with a strong MOU that administration actually oversees and enforces, to ensure police provide the benefit of safety without causing the harm of interfering with student discipline.

The political agenda is turn the US into an Police State. Provide a shred of evidence that violence is up at MCPS, no anecdotes please.

[Anonymous]

Looks about the same to me.

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (lower)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (lower)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (same)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (higher)
Rape 13 4 13 (same)
Threats 13 3 11 (lower)
Weapons 54 49 67 (higher)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you watch nothing else, please watch the recent graduate recount how her relationship and trust in her SRO helped her face a crisis moment where a bunch of cops showed up at her house. Minute 31.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNd8ecOVyI

Policy by anecdote is bad policy. Good TV, but still bad policy.

Anecdote is the sole reason Elrich pulled them out. Then violence skyrocketed and there was a school shooting.

+1
Anecdote is why we lost SROs in the first place. If you watch the link above, you’ll see that it provides pro-SRO anecdotes to balance the echo chamber anecdotes that led to Elrich’s decision in the first place. The video also provides some MCPS-specific statistics, which were largely ignored by Elrich and the council.

Violence was about the same but pro-SRO posters kept highlighting every incident to make it seem that way. Putting them back won't really solve anything. It simply is a way to divert more funds from education into other pockets.

Violence absolutely was not the same. The stats from the first half of the year show an increase in violent crime. And if you have been following the news at all, you know it's been a nightmare at many schools. Beating a security guard, massive fight at Seneca Valley, attempted sodomy in the Wootton boys locker room, several guns recovered, at least one stabbing, and more. I don't care about drugs or petty theft. But the violence needs to be stopped.

There is no cost to putting SROs back in schools. They are already assigned as CEOs, but cannot really spend time developing the nonenforcement relationships with students that help prevent the violence. Their cost is also paid out of the police department budget and costs MCPS absolutely nothing. Never has.

+1 to all of this. SROs aren’t event paid through MCPS.

To the “SROs won’t solve anything” poster above, I recommend you watch the recording of last night’s forum. You’ll hear a lot about what SROs have done and what they can do.

Yes, the PP is correct. Violence was about the same as any year. The pro-SRO posters wanted to make it seem worse because it was aligned with their political agenda but there's no evidence to support this.

The "political agenda" is to keep kids safe. You make it sound like it's a bad thing.

Kids can't learn if they are constantly in fear. They can't close the achievement gap. And guess who's getting hurt the most? Black and brown kids. Mostly AA boys. According to the mid year stats, and remember, there are fewer kids enrolled this year:

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (already surpassed last full year)
Rape 13 4 13 (already equalled last full year)
Threats 13 3 11 (on pace to surpass last full year)
Weapons 54 49 67 (already surpassed last full year)

These don't count assaults that are not reported to police because they aren't deemed as severe (if a nurse can treat injuries on site, it doesn't get reported to police). https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/council/Resources/Files/agenda/cm/2022/20220209/20220209_ECPS1.pdf

A male, African American high school student is 200 times more likely to be assaulted than arrested in school. Mid-year, five AA students had been arrested. And yet national data shows 3% of AA students are violently victimized at school Students ages 12-18 are actually less safe, statstically, at school than elsewhere in the community.

https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/report-indicators-school-crime-and-safety-2020#:~:text=In%202019%2C%20students%20ages%2012,bullied%20in%202009%20(28%25).

Everyone is touting mental health and wellness centers as solutions. The schools need wellness centers, but they generally help with things like suicide threats, etc. People with mental health challenges are far more likely to be victimized than to ever commit violence. We can demonize them all we want, but the truth is, mental health services alone is not our way out of the violence.

The schools ALSO need an evidence-based SRO program with a strong MOU that administration actually oversees and enforces, to ensure police provide the benefit of safety without causing the harm of interfering with student discipline.

The political agenda is turn the US into an Police State. Provide a shred of evidence that violence is up at MCPS, no anecdotes please.

The PP already did that for you. The 21-22 data was for the first HALF of the year. You can reasonably assume, therefore, that the number of crimes has increased in every single category.

The following document contains MCPS-specific data regarding arrests during 2019-2020, the last SRO report before Elrich pulled the program. You can use it to see that there is absolutely no attempt to turn MCPS (or the US, for that matter) into a police state. SROs only initiated 3% (9 total) arrests during the school year, district-wide. Discipline, therefore, is primarily in the hands of the schools’ administrative teams. They did issue 243 paper arrests, which initiates services like drug awareness help or counseling. Most of those 243 paper arrests did not end up on permanent records, so they did not affect job or college opportunities. Simply put, the SROs respond to crimes that happen in school, and yes, they are increasing. They also do so much more, as the document below will tell you:
https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/pol/Resources/Files/SRO/MCPD-SRO-FAQ.pdf
I appreciate the information on community building and threat assessment.


So, there’s your evidence of crime in reading (provided by the PP) and how SROs can help address it through a partnership with MCPS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks about the same to me.

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (lower)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (lower)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (same)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (higher)
Rape 13 4 13 (same)
Threats 13 3 11 (lower)
Weapons 54 49 67 (higher)

The 3rd column represents a HALF year, so the district met those numbers 1/2 year before the numbers you see in the other columns.

To use assaults as an example, 2018-2019 had 155 reported assaults by the end of the year (June). For the 2021-2022 number, the school system already hit 105 by January. That is trending UP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks about the same to me.

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (lower)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (lower)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (same)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (higher)
Rape 13 4 13 (same)
Threats 13 3 11 (lower)
Weapons 54 49 67 (higher)

Seems like things have gotten better even.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks about the same to me.

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (lower)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (lower)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (same)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (higher)
Rape 13 4 13 (same)
Threats 13 3 11 (lower)
Weapons 54 49 67 (higher)

Seems like things have gotten better even.

Please read the notes next to the dates. The 2018-2019 statistics are for a full year of school. 2021-2022 is for just the first half.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks about the same to me.

2018-2019 (full year) 2019-2020 (3/4 year) 2021-2022 (first half of year)

Assault 155 133 105 (lower)
Agg Assault 12 9 9 (lower)
Bomb Threat 4 4 4 (same)
Harrass/Stalk 9 5 15 (higher)
Rape 13 4 13 (same)
Threats 13 3 11 (lower)
Weapons 54 49 67 (higher)

Seems like things have gotten better even.

Ya'll failed math, didn't you?