Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I haven't read the decision yet, but, good for Liman, I was almost thinking he was going to give it to them.

As for the next thing Gottlieb requests, it looks like a doozy. First they want to strike the transcript of Lively's depo from the docket (I think they raise good points here, there was no need to post the entire, unverified transcript when citing two lines) https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.540.0.pdf

Then, a big motion for sanctions against Freedman for being a big meanie https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.546.0.pdf

The docket has a zillion exhibits to TMZ, etc (#547) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69510553/lively-v-wayfarer-studios-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

Perhaps Liman will grant the motion to strike with a harsh rebuke, in lieu of actually granting the motion for sanctions, consistent with what he's done in the past.

Rebuke for what? Freedman hasn’t opened his mouth publicly about this case for two months, and he hasn’t done anything sanctionable in this litigation.

But the depo transcript made exhibit to a letter was filed as confidential so public cannot see it so what is big deal? Does it mean if don’t strike the transcript it becomes public after the case is over? Would it be public even if case settles or just if go to court? Not following why need to strike the transcript if gen public can’t see it anyway? What is process?

Once you file something under seal here, the opposing party has a week to argue it should remain under seal and why. If they don't file anything, the doc automatically gets released. So filing the whole rough draft transcript under seal makes busy work for Lively's attys in having to, presumably, go through the whole (rough draft!!! not even proofed yet!) transcript to say what should be confidential and what can be released.

It unnecessary when Fritz was only using the dep for a 2 page pin cite. The normal practice is file just those 2 pages and any surrounding context you might need. The even *more* normal practice is NOT to file the entire transcript of a dep that is still a rough draft ASCII copy lol. They did it purely to be jerks and maybe get the dep in front of the judge, or more likely the judge's clerk. Very on brand for them.

The Lively team has been acting like jerks this whole process, love that Team Wayfarer is finally fighting back! WOO HOO!

[Anonymous]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.564.0.pdf

26 page motion in opposition to Perez asking for a protective order. Dont miss the list of disparaging names he has for Blake! Should be fun to read with morning coffee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.564.0.pdf

26 page motion in opposition to Perez asking for a protective order. Dont miss the list of disparaging names he has for Blake! Should be fun to read with morning coffee.

His emails to BL law firm before the motion went out:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.2.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.3.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.564.0.pdf

26 page motion in opposition to Perez asking for a protective order. Dont miss the list of disparaging names he has for Blake! Should be fun to read with morning coffee.

His emails to BL law firm before the motion went out:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.2.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.3.pdf

Zero-time Oscar winner….

He has also referred to her as “Subpoena Serena” which is great.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.564.0.pdf

26 page motion in opposition to Perez asking for a protective order. Dont miss the list of disparaging names he has for Blake! Should be fun to read with morning coffee.

His emails to BL law firm before the motion went out:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.2.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.3.pdf

Zero-time Oscar winner….

He has also referred to her as “Subpoena Serena” which is great.

Those two are my favorites as well!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.564.0.pdf

26 page motion in opposition to Perez asking for a protective order. Dont miss the list of disparaging names he has for Blake! Should be fun to read with morning coffee.

His emails to BL law firm before the motion went out:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.2.pdf

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.3.pdf

Zero-time Oscar winner….

He has also referred to her as “Subpoena Serena” which is great.

Those two are my favorites as well!

I'm digging "Ku Klux Khaleesi."

[Anonymous]

How can it possibly br worth it for BL counsel to be involving Perez Hilton??? By continuing to push on Perez, judge just ordered them to had over “confidential” Exhibit F- cannot imagine they want to hand over anything to Perez, but it’s right that he cannot respond pro de unless they do. He won’t be able to release the confidential info to his subscribers, but he can milk that he got it in 1000 posts. Digging a hole for themselves or do they really think he has the smoking gun?

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1mjgb6i/blake_ordered_to_hand_over_confidential_exhibits/#lightbox

[Anonymous]

Even the Page Six reporters are put off by Blake. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8kVc74v/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even the Page Six reporters are put off by Blake. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8kVc74v/

"Anti-Lively, neutral on him." Same girl, same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How can it possibly br worth it for BL counsel to be involving Perez Hilton??? By continuing to push on Perez, judge just ordered them to had over “confidential” Exhibit F- cannot imagine they want to hand over anything to Perez, but it’s right that he cannot respond pro de unless they do. He won’t be able to release the confidential info to his subscribers, but he can milk that he got it in 1000 posts. Digging a hole for themselves or do they really think he has the smoking gun?

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1mjgb6i/blake_ordered_to_hand_over_confidential_exhibits/#lightbox

Heh, maybe acting pro se was a 4d chess move so he could access attorney's eyes only stuff.

He won't be able to resist leaking info from it, and Lively will respond with a huffy letter to the judge full of bold italics.

Their motion goes quite hard against him - calls him not a journalist but more of a paid advertising shill. My guess is he's something in between, he's not a journalist going after the unbiased truth but exercises his own editorial discretion on what to publish based on his personal likes and dislikes and what gets clicks, not because TAG or Freedman literally told him to. They want the Nevada case moved back to NY, and Perez has been shit talking about Liman on that docket, hah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even the Page Six reporters are put off by Blake. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8kVc74v/

I'm surprised by how much love they have for Leslie Sloane, I always assumed she was a menace. I guess though that's why she's been a publicist for so long though with such high-profile clients -- she probably has good relationships with journalists...or at least knows which journalists she should have good relationships with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even the Page Six reporters are put off by Blake. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8kVc74v/

I'm surprised by how much love they have for Leslie Sloane, I always assumed she was a menace. I guess though that's why she's been a publicist for so long though with such high-profile clients -- she probably has good relationships with journalists...or at least knows which journalists she should have good relationships with.

PP I should clarify that I didn't actually click the link when I responded, because I saw the full video on YouTube earlier. This TikTok clip looks like it's a shortened, so I don't know if they included the part about Leslie Sloane, if you were wondering what the hell I'm talking about lol.

[Anonymous]

Does anyone have the link to last letter from Perez to judge- he sent it today. Apparently full sass mode.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have the link to last letter from Perez to judge- he sent it today. Apparently full sass mode.

I believe it's this https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.0.pdf

I do like how he signs it xoxo, like Gossip Girl.

And the exhibits - his motion: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.1.pdf IMO, the female anon content creators generally wrote better ones that he did!

Snarky email to Hudson: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.2.pdf

An email to the attorneys opening with "hey cuties!" https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.558.3.pdf

He was trying to act kinda professional at first but is definitely going off the deep end. Very entertaining.

[Anonymous]

I don't like Perez, but is it just me or do Blake supporters act a little hysterical over him? He was gross back in the day, but no one takes him seriously now and everyone thinks he's a loser. Blake supporters act like he's some sort of violent misogynist and that platforming him is an act of violence, when Blake is the one emboldening him and giving him the attention he craves by sending over those subpoenas.