Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How can it possibly br worth it for BL counsel to be involving Perez Hilton??? By continuing to push on Perez, judge just ordered them to had over “confidential” Exhibit F- cannot imagine they want to hand over anything to Perez, but it’s right that he cannot respond pro de unless they do. He won’t be able to release the confidential info to his subscribers, but he can milk that he got it in 1000 posts. Digging a hole for themselves or do they really think he has the smoking gun?

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1mjgb6i/blake_ordered_to_hand_over_confidential_exhibits/#lightbox

[/quote]

Heh, maybe acting pro se was a 4d chess move so he could access attorney's eyes only stuff.

He won't be able to resist leaking info from it,  and Lively will respond with a huffy letter to the judge full of bold italics.

Their motion goes quite hard against him - calls him not a journalist but more of a paid advertising shill. My guess is he's something in between, he's not a journalist going after the unbiased truth but exercises his own editorial discretion on what to publish based on his personal likes and dislikes and what gets clicks, not because TAG or Freedman literally told him to. They want the Nevada case moved back to NY, and Perez has been shit talking about Liman on that docket, hah. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics