Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

And btw, i do want to hear same perspective from Baldoni and Heath, and also about interactions they had with other women. Why did Heath insist on showing his birth video, did Baldoni tell Ferrer her scene was hot and ask if she practiced etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's weird how much focus people have on Lively deposition, but I've never heard anything about Jusin's or Jamey's deposition. Or Jen Abel! That one could be bananas because you know Lively's attorneys would go after her for the critical things she said about Baldoni behind his back.

Why do people only seem to care about Lively's depo? Presumably she will pretty much say what she said in her complaint. Wheres the people on the other side, I don't have a clear idea about what they would say. The complaint they filed for the dismissed case was an amalgamation of their perspectives. There is significantly more chance for their depos to be revealing or determinative than for Lively's to be.

I'm interested in all of them, but come on... hers is the centerpiece, she's the plaintiff, there are lots of omitted and unclear details in her complaint. I can think of a million questions to ask about the SH.

DP Ooh, this sounds like a fun thought exercise: What would you ask?!

Hah...
What were you actually wearing in the birth scene?
Who was present during that scene?
Did Mondschein do anything to make you uncomfortable?
How do you know whether the set was closed?

What were you wearing when Heath came into your dressing room?
Who was present?
What body parts were visible?
How many times did he turn around?
Was he animated or standing still?
Did you feel like he did it on purpose?
Did you say you knew he wasn't copping a look?
Why did you say that?

What was the context of your conversation with Baldoni when he said he didn't always ask for consent?

Why did you change your narrative about the dance scene?

What does "never with teeth" mean?

Love it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And btw, i do want to hear same perspective from Baldoni and Heath, and also about interactions they had with other women. Why did Heath insist on showing his birth video, did Baldoni tell Ferrer her scene was hot and ask if she practiced etc.

Also interested in this.

[Anonymous]

This chain was interesting. Baldoni is on it but doesn't say a peep. Gross talk about one of Lily's scenes, and oh hey check out how they're talking about how Lively's concerns were just about getting control of the movie and not about portrayal of underage stuff as *she* said, but okay.

I wonder what the "But with more in it" means at the end. I think this means JB's version had more sox etc in it but could be wrong.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.522.1.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's weird how much focus people have on Lively deposition, but I've never heard anything about Jusin's or Jamey's deposition. Or Jen Abel! That one could be bananas because you know Lively's attorneys would go after her for the critical things she said about Baldoni behind his back.

Why do people only seem to care about Lively's depo? Presumably she will pretty much say what she said in her complaint. Wheres the people on the other side, I don't have a clear idea about what they would say. The complaint they filed for the dismissed case was an amalgamation of their perspectives. There is significantly more chance for their depos to be revealing or determinative than for Lively's to be.

Because she is the plaintiff and has the burden of proof on the remaining claims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This chain was interesting. Baldoni is on it but doesn't say a peep. Gross talk about one of Lily's scenes, and oh hey check out how they're talking about how Lively's concerns were just about getting control of the movie and not about portrayal of underage stuff as *she* said, but okay.

I wonder what the "But with more in it" means at the end. I think this means JB's version had more sox etc in it but could be wrong.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.522.1.pdf

I find it super weird they'd be that invested in whether or not a "thrust" happens on screen. I think they are vastly overrating how much women (the target audience) would want to see that in a movie like this. I just can't imagine fighting over that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This chain was interesting. Baldoni is on it but doesn't say a peep. Gross talk about one of Lily's scenes, and oh hey check out how they're talking about how Lively's concerns were just about getting control of the movie and not about portrayal of underage stuff as *she* said, but okay.

I wonder what the "But with more in it" means at the end. I think this means JB's version had more sox etc in it but could be wrong.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.522.1.pdf

I find it super weird they'd be that invested in whether or not a "thrust" happens on screen. I think they are vastly overrating how much women (the target audience) would want to see that in a movie like this. I just can't imagine fighting over that.

Yes! I agree with that. I think that's distasteful.

Also, when these text exchanges appeared in Baldoni's complaint, BALDONI was the author of the ones complaining about Lively and how she'd have ultimate control over the Lily scenes etc. The way he is talking about her complaints all being fiction and everything being a power move to take over the film, to his entire editing team, seems overtly retaliatory to me, but ymmv.

[Anonymous]

Lmao I'm super naive and thought the "thrust" was, like, a technical directing term. I get it now.

Smart for Baldoni to keep silent. Didn't even notice he was on it until PP pointed it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This chain was interesting. Baldoni is on it but doesn't say a peep. Gross talk about one of Lily's scenes, and oh hey check out how they're talking about how Lively's concerns were just about getting control of the movie and not about portrayal of underage stuff as *she* said, but okay.

I wonder what the "But with more in it" means at the end. I think this means JB's version had more sox etc in it but could be wrong.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.522.1.pdf

I find it super weird they'd be that invested in whether or not a "thrust" happens on screen. I think they are vastly overrating how much women (the target audience) would want to see that in a movie like this. I just can't imagine fighting over that.

Yes! I agree with that. I think that's distasteful.

Also, when these text exchanges appeared in Baldoni's complaint, BALDONI was the author of the ones complaining about Lively and how she'd have ultimate control over the Lily scenes etc. The way he is talking about her complaints all being fiction and everything being a power move to take over the film, to his entire editing team, seems overtly retaliatory to me, but ymmv.

Oh please, it's called having an opinion about someone who was trying to take over the film. Anyone who has seen a clip of Blake interacting with other actors has seen her in this mode.

[Anonymous]

I feel bad for Baldoni. You can find suspicious intent in any movie involving sex scenes. That's because they're sex scenes. Once again, Blake stans keep treating this as if it's a white-collar office job and any mention about the choreographing of sex is "Ew, icky!"

[Anonymous]

How many millions have Blake and Ryan blown on this hoax? Over/under $15 million so far?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for Baldoni. You can find suspicious intent in any movie involving sex scenes. That's because they're sex scenes. Once again, Blake stans keep treating this as if it's a white-collar office job and any mention about the choreographing of sex is "Ew, icky!"

Yes, exactly. We once find ourselves among the morality police. Meanwhile, Blake is giving her one year a boob cake and talking about it on tv, and you know, using her teeth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for Baldoni. You can find suspicious intent in any movie involving sex scenes. That's because they're sex scenes. Once again, Blake stans keep treating this as if it's a white-collar office job and any mention about the choreographing of sex is "Ew, icky!"

Blake has no stans. It's all paid bots, in contrast to the masses being organically on Jason's side.

[Anonymous]

Welp Baldoni's attys did everything they could to intimidate Lively from appearing at her deposition. Threatened to sell tickets, insisted on having it at offices of fake puncher Freedman and/or his co-counsel until judge told them nope, and had accused harasser Justin Baldoni show up in person to sit at the table apparently. And yet, Lively showed and was deposed. Sad for you.

Was Freedman even there, I wonder? Did Gottlieb ultimately get his way that Freedman wouldn't depose Lively even though everyone laughed at him at the time? It's tricky to try to take depositions in a case when in a few weeks you might be sitting for a deposition yourself. Poor Bryan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for Baldoni. You can find suspicious intent in any movie involving sex scenes. That's because they're sex scenes. Once again, Blake stans keep treating this as if it's a white-collar office job and any mention about the choreographing of sex is "Ew, icky!"

Blake has no stans. It's all paid bots, in contrast to the masses being organically on Jason's side.

lol you're right, my bad.