Mass Deportation: this is going to be expensive

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Priorities are always revealed by one's actions.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Priorities are always revealed by one's actions.

+1

Then let the voters vote her out.

[Anonymous]

Last November, Donald Trump soundly defeated Kamala Harris among young men 18 to 29 years old, racking up about 56% of their votes according to the Associated Press. That represents a huge decline from 2008, the climax of the Barack Obama coalition, when the Democratic candidate won 62% of the young male vote against GOP challenger John McCain.

Clearly, Democrats have a young man problem—and they've vowed to do something about it.

On the issue of immigration, you might consider not opening up America's borders to, well, pretty much the whole world—but especially young males in search of economic opportunity in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Democrats might not have gotten this impression from the Harvard faculty lounge, but over half of Americans these days live paycheck to paycheck. Far too many young men struggle to provide for their families; indeed, many delay marriage in the first place because of finances. Flooding the zone with more wage competition may please the wokerati, but it won't help you regain credibility with American breadwinners.

https://www.newsweek.com/how-democrats-can-stop-alienating-young-men-some-unsolicited-advice-opinion-2081758

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Priorities are always revealed by one's actions.

+1

Then let the voters vote her out.

She represrnts the values and priorities of Californians in her area.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Priorities are always revealed by one's actions.

+1

Then let the voters vote her out.

She represrnts the values and priorities of Californians in her area.

And, many democrats across the nation. As is evident by comments in this board.
This is why democrats can no longer be in power. They have no intention of securing the borders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Priorities are always revealed by one's actions.

+1

Then let the voters vote her out.

She represrnts the values and priorities of Californians in her area.

And, many democrats across the nation. As is evident by comments in this board.
This is why democrats can no longer be in power. They have no intention of securing the borders.

Blah blah blah. We are all about to take an economic beating so why don't you find something more useful to do with your time and try to get someone in charge that can deal with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

She is literally encouraging mob violence. Here is the result of her words:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She is literally encouraging mob violence. Here is the result of her words:

The mayor is rallying and calling up her shock-troops. Notice how her “peaceful protesters” brought A HAMMER to the riot?

This mayor is THE WORST.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We don’t have to grant asylum to everyone who asks. A non specific fear of going home is not enough.

No one is asking for everyone who asks for asylum to be granted it, but that’s a handsome strawman you constructed.

You know perfectly well the Democrats allowed millions to enter, remain here, get lost in the system, have children, access all kinds of expensive services, and then say, "Oh, but due process for sll people."

You know perfectly well that asking for asylum is lawful and Republicans have refused for more than a decade to vote for funding that would hire more people to make the process faster.

Trump shut down the number of people asking, by having them wait in Mexico, and also by skipping the backlog and doing immediate interviews at the border.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why should we make the process faster?

Because the guy from Honduras applies for asylum at the border and is given a hearing date a year later will be in the country “illegally” according to you LONGER THAN the guy who is given a hearing date a month later in a world where a common sense bill passes advocating for hiring more immigration judges. And only a month here taking your jobs is not enough time to make the trip worth the effort.

Incorrect. The guy from Honduras can be told to stay at the border until his hearing. He could also be rejected outright as he should apply in Mexico.
Trump was and is doing the first option, which means the people showing up to apply has gone way down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Priorities are always revealed by one's actions.

+1

Then let the voters vote her out.

She represrnts the values and priorities of Californians in her area.

And, many democrats across the nation. As is evident by comments in this board.
This is why democrats can no longer be in power. They have no intention of securing the borders.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why should we make the process faster?

Because the guy from Honduras applies for asylum at the border and is given a hearing date a year later will be in the country “illegally” according to you LONGER THAN the guy who is given a hearing date a month later in a world where a common sense bill passes advocating for hiring more immigration judges. And only a month here taking your jobs is not enough time to make the trip worth the effort.

Incorrect. The guy from Honduras can be told to stay at the border until his hearing. He could also be rejected outright as he should apply in Mexico.
Trump was and is doing the first option, which means the people showing up to apply has gone way down.

Canada does the same thing. Canada has a “wait in America” policy.

Is Canada cruel too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Why should we make the process faster?

Because the guy from Honduras applies for asylum at the border and is given a hearing date a year later will be in the country “illegally” according to you LONGER THAN the guy who is given a hearing date a month later in a world where a common sense bill passes advocating for hiring more immigration judges. And only a month here taking your jobs is not enough time to make the trip worth the effort.

Incorrect. The guy from Honduras can be told to stay at the border until his hearing. He could also be rejected outright as he should apply in Mexico.
Trump was and is doing the first option, which means the people showing up to apply has gone way down.

Canada does the same thing. Canada has a “wait in America” policy.

Is Canada cruel too?

Most of the illegals caught at the northern border, are actually from the south who under Trump have decided they wanted to try to get to Canada.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

You know what’s not expensive? Not having to deport people because they’ve stopped coming here.