Same. Quite funny. |
At the Kindergarten level as long as your child is not a huge distraction admission directors are really considering the parents more than the child so my guess is the parents of the less impressive child, impressed. |
Impressive and not impressive in what ways? Can’t imagine how impressiveness is determined at 4 years old… |
Lagging in social and verbal skills. Highly doubtful that the parents were the deciding factor unless they were looking for something extremely particular to round out the class. |
Really?? |
This cracks me up. My son was an early summer boy at a fairly competitive pre-school. He was "lagging" socially and very average verbally, particularly compared to a class full of boys 8-9 months older, which is a lot at that age. The school subtly recommended that he repeat pre-k. We ignored them and sent him to our very good neighborhood public where he was in the older half of the grade. It took him a little while to get his footing but he did and 10+ years later is at the top of his class at a very competitive HS and a very well-adjusted, happy teenager with plenty of friends and better social skills than most of the superstars from his pre-k class. Some kids just take longer to get going and need to be removed from the obnoxious NYC private ecosystem for a while. The fact that life-influencing decisions are being based on brief interactions with 4-5 year olds, and more importantly, that parents put so much of their self-worth in how their child performs on these evaluations, is really amazing and sad. |
Parents are definitely the deciding factor at the kindergarten entry point. |
I think even at the 9th grade entry point parents can be pretty important. They probably won’t make a successful application, but they can surely break it… |
How would you know? It could be the grandparents. |
Far from it. Both sets of grandparents are blue collar types from Queens and the likes. The parents are extremely awkward, almost as if they are a combination of starstruck and lost. One is a mid-level finance type and the other a generalist doctor type. They do value education greatly and the girl checks a diversity box on one side, though all of the classmates parents think the child won't be a fit at the school she is now going to. None of this is meant be judgmental. Just giving facts, you never know what moves the needle and what the schools are looking for in filling out their classes. Many are quick to shoot the PSD but you do have unexpected outcomes. |
My husband is socially awkward, so are a number of our friends. Our kids are all at TT schools in NYC and the west coast. We all went to Ivy schools with advanced degrees and some have PhDs. Some of us have good careers while others have regular corporate jobs. Perhaps the TT schools like parents who went to good colleges and have advanced degrees even if they are socially awkward? |
Do you explicitly state your educational pedigree? I never did at interviews, except in one case when the interviewer asked me point blank if I had gone to a specific very highly regarded university (I did, but found it rather inappropriate). |
You don’t need to bring it up in interviews. All the schools we applied to ask where you went to school and jobs etc in the application forms. Some even ask where you went to high school. |
| Yeah they definitely care about the parents school and jobs. |
This is just sad. Cringe. |