Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.

Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.

Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.

A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.

So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.

We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.

When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?

- Independent

+1. Not only did Bill Barr’s dad help create Epstein, Tony Blinken is also right there. What the f*ck?!

How does all this square with the Mossad angle? I’m not familiar with this web of people or where the motivations stem…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.

Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.

Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.

A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.

So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.

We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.

When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?

- Independent

Yes. There is a high probability this was orchestrated for blackmail of our most powerful, rich and influential people.

The biggest honeypot in the world, I bet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How could anyone think this guy is a pedo?

At 15, the same age as many victims, she looks like a child for all those sickos arguing otherwise.

[Anonymous]

I think there are so many people in the files that neither party wants them released. Obviously Clinton was likely an active participant. I’m guessing Trump didn’t think there was anything damning on him until Pam found all kinds of stuff. I think he really thought he was teflon don and his buddy Epstein didn’t have anything implicating him. Now they’re probably firing up the shredders.

[Anonymous]

A lot of us democrats were very upset about Blinken being in the Biden Administration. This was all known.

[Anonymous]

don't be fooled by this ruse of grand jury interviews being released by the courts. This is akin to " i would release my taxes but it is under audit"

What is important are the investigation notes - the 302's, video and photo records etc. Grand jury testimony is pretty meaningless in this context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s absolutely fascinating that MAGA is just now realizing that Trump is a creepy pedo rapist. What are they going to discover next? That’s he’s not actually a successful businessman?

They knew this, MAGA is a cult. We all knew he was scum. But many MAGA are equally as scummy.

If you listen to focus groups of Trump voters they all think he was actually a successful businessman. They bought the Apprentice hook line and sinker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could anyone think this guy is a pedo?

At 15, the same age as many victims, she looks like a child for all those sickos arguing otherwise.

We don’t really know what Ivanka looks like. She would still ‘look like a child’ if not for the very extensive plastic surgery. The plastic surgery has aged her. Stop saying that women age horribly after age 15 years old, you are wrong. Do women all get massive wrinkles across their faces, bags under eyes, huge boobs, by the time they’re 25? No this isn’t accurate, they should appear very similar.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could anyone think this guy is a pedo?

At 15, the same age as many victims, she looks like a child for all those sickos arguing otherwise.

We don’t really know what Ivanka looks like. She would still ‘look like a child’ if not for the very extensive plastic surgery. The plastic surgery has aged her. Stop saying that women age horribly after age 15 years old, you are wrong. Do women all get massive wrinkles across their faces, bags under eyes, huge boobs, by the time they’re 25? No this isn’t accurate, they should appear very similar.

In the picture and is 15 and looks like a child. IDC what she looks like now. No, she wouldn’t look like a child at 40 without plastic surgery you pedo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.

Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now.

Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma.

A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse.

So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices:
1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or
2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice.

We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through.

When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning?

- Independent

+1. Not only did Bill Barr’s dad help create Epstein, Tony Blinken is also right there. What the f*ck?!

How does all this square with the Mossad angle? I’m not familiar with this web of people or where the motivations stem…

Robert Maxwell, father of Ghislaine, had links to the KGB and Mi6 and was allegedly a spy for Mossad. You can google his involvement with PROMIS software.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could anyone think this guy is a pedo?

At 15, the same age as many victims, she looks like a child for all those sickos arguing otherwise.

We don’t really know what Ivanka looks like. She would still ‘look like a child’ if not for the very extensive plastic surgery. The plastic surgery has aged her. Stop saying that women age horribly after age 15 years old, you are wrong. Do women all get massive wrinkles across their faces, bags under eyes, huge boobs, by the time they’re 25? No this isn’t accurate, they should appear very similar.

In the picture and is 15 and looks like a child. IDC what she looks like now. No, she wouldn’t look like a child at 40 without plastic surgery you pedo.

Can you stop calling me that? I hate most kids actually. Ivanka has aged badly thanks to plastic surgery. She ruined herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What I am wondering is how many young males were enticed to the Island. Having sex with a young boy would be a firing squad for trump.

Ask Lindsay about that.

I know you mean Lindsay Graham, but this reminded me of what Trump said about Lindsay Lohan when she was 16.

Why is the Jewish host Stern getting a pass in all of this? Stern was this way with every guest. He is a degenerate closeted homosexual racist.

Howard Stern has completely reformed. Trump is still the same POS he was in this clip, just older and dumber.

Stern is married to a female beard after a 40 year career of depravity and racism. He is not reformed, he is a lifelong sicko right there with Trump.

I am not interested in Stern’s personal life (and if he’s gay that’s perfectly fine), but I abhor low-lifes like him who make a living off outrageously misogynistic and abusive comments in public. Disgusting pervert.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Why is that strange? Trump and his thugs will try to mess with anyone that dares to criticize him about anything. It's been that way forever and his supporters don't care. They love their snowflake baby man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

This needs more reporting. Fox is once again lying by omission to its viewers, but this time it’s about something they really care about!