GA Case

[Anonymous]

A black lawyer couldn’t have possibly earned their own money? Couldn’t possibly afford vacations?

There were 2 other prosecutors brought in on this case, and they’re being paid the same as Wade. But…they’re white, so they earned it. They deserve it.

Give me a f-n break with this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the plaintiffs attorneys think Wade isn’t qualified to prosecute felonies, why do they want him removed? He’s done pretty well so far with grand jury indictments, guilty pleas, and defeating plaintiffs’ motions to try to move their cases, claim executive privilege, etc.

+1. If he’s such a bad lawyer, you’d think they’d want to keep him on the case. The intense focus on getting rid of him suggests that he’s been quite effective.

Conflict of interest. Go look it up. Not everything in life is about gaining advantage or unfair advantage.

What’s the conflict? He’s on the same side as his alleged GF. If he was a defendants lawyer and dating the prosecutor, that would be a conflict. But not when they are on the same side.

Not when Wade's girlfriend is the sole and only person approving Wade's bills including numerous charges of 24 hours billing per day and reaping benefits by approving said "24 hours of billing" per day.

The motion doesn't even allege that Willis approves Wade's bills at all, much less that she is the "sole and only person" approving them. In fact, all of them were approved someone with the initials "ATG," which are not Willis' initials. So you're just making that up.

According to the AJC, the DA (Fani Willis) authorizes his compensation.

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/

In other words, a guy used his salary to take his girlfriend on vacation.

By using the money he received from the government/said girlfriend (billing 24 hours/day on at least 4 occasions) by over-charging/padding his bills so that Fannie the girlfriend can go on expensive vacations with her boyfriend.

I see. So you have never had a bf/gf and would never take them on vacation. Or be taken on vacation with them. Or go on vacation with them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the plaintiffs attorneys think Wade isn’t qualified to prosecute felonies, why do they want him removed? He’s done pretty well so far with grand jury indictments, guilty pleas, and defeating plaintiffs’ motions to try to move their cases, claim executive privilege, etc.

+1. If he’s such a bad lawyer, you’d think they’d want to keep him on the case. The intense focus on getting rid of him suggests that he’s been quite effective.

Conflict of interest. Go look it up. Not everything in life is about gaining advantage or unfair advantage.

What’s the conflict? He’s on the same side as his alleged GF. If he was a defendants lawyer and dating the prosecutor, that would be a conflict. But not when they are on the same side.

Not when Wade's girlfriend is the sole and only person approving Wade's bills including numerous charges of 24 hours billing per day and reaping benefits by approving said "24 hours of billing" per day.

The motion doesn't even allege that Willis approves Wade's bills at all, much less that she is the "sole and only person" approving them. In fact, all of them were approved someone with the initials "ATG," which are not Willis' initials. So you're just making that up.

Also, could you let us know what days there were "numerous charges of 24 hours billing per day? There are some 24 hour entries but they span over several days.

You said "numerous charges of 24 hours billing per day." That's one instance. His invoices frequently lump multiple days on one line and then charge a lump sum for an activity over all of those days. Seems like this one instance may be one of those and it was just mislabeled as one day, especially since there are no charges for the day before or several days after.

Lawyers who understand how billing is reported (and that different lawyers do it different ways) will understand that this is not a problem.

Well, well.

I'm guessing your interpretation of that is that one person in one 24-hour period worked on the prep? Maybe it is, probably it ins't. There are more ways to read that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A black lawyer couldn’t have possibly earned their own money? Couldn’t possibly afford vacations?

There were 2 other prosecutors brought in on this case, and they’re being paid the same as Wade. But…they’re white, so they earned it. They deserve it.

Give me a f-n break with this.

We have no idea how much they were paid. Fani claims that they were paid the same hourly rate, but how much have they earned from this case since mid-2022?
My guess is it is no where close to $654,000.
Seems that Wade is now the highest paid prosecutor in GA. Sweet deal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A black lawyer couldn’t have possibly earned their own money? Couldn’t possibly afford vacations?

There were 2 other prosecutors brought in on this case, and they’re being paid the same as Wade. But…they’re white, so they earned it. They deserve it.

Give me a f-n break with this.

We have no idea how much they were paid. Fani claims that they were paid the same hourly rate, but how much have they earned from this case since mid-2022?
My guess is it is no where close to $654,000.
Seems that Wade is now the highest paid prosecutor in GA. Sweet deal.

Prosecutors are notoriously underpaid. And outside contractors are expensive.

If taxpayers properly funded government services, maybe these imbalances wouldn't exist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

She said all three prosecutors she hired were paid the same hourly rate.
Go away, Trump Russian Troll. You pollute every thread you touch, just like your vile idol, Vlad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Liar.
She did not need approval to hire him. He was not a relative of hers, so no nepotism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I do think the optics are not good for Fanni. She should not have hired her boyfriend, a man without the experience needed to prosecute the former POTUS. That was a big misstep. But it wasn't illegal. Stupidity isn't illegal unless you break a law. She hasn't, at least not to my knowledge. And even if she has, it has NO BEARING on Trump's alleged crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

She went to Widner Commonwealth law school, ranked 159 by USNews.

John Marshall law school is ranked 171 by USNews, if that's where he went to law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the plaintiffs attorneys think Wade isn’t qualified to prosecute felonies, why do they want him removed? He’s done pretty well so far with grand jury indictments, guilty pleas, and defeating plaintiffs’ motions to try to move their cases, claim executive privilege, etc.

+1. If he’s such a bad lawyer, you’d think they’d want to keep him on the case. The intense focus on getting rid of him suggests that he’s been quite effective.

Conflict of interest. Go look it up. Not everything in life is about gaining advantage or unfair advantage.

What’s the conflict? He’s on the same side as his alleged GF. If he was a defendants lawyer and dating the prosecutor, that would be a conflict. But not when they are on the same side.

Not when Wade's girlfriend is the sole and only person approving Wade's bills including numerous charges of 24 hours billing per day and reaping benefits by approving said "24 hours of billing" per day.

The motion doesn't even allege that Willis approves Wade's bills at all, much less that she is the "sole and only person" approving them. In fact, all of them were approved someone with the initials "ATG," which are not Willis' initials. So you're just making that up.

According to the AJC, the DA (Fani Willis) authorizes his compensation.

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/

In other words, a guy used his salary to take his girlfriend on vacation.

By using the money he received from the government/said girlfriend (billing 24 hours/day on at least 4 occasions) by over-charging/padding his bills so that Fannie the girlfriend can go on expensive vacations with her boyfriend.

But he didn’t bill 24 hours/day on at least 4 occasions. That’s something you just made up. This is why no one believes what you people say. You’re liars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

She went to Widner Commonwealth law school, ranked 159 by USNews.

John Marshall law school is ranked 171 by USNews, if that's where he went to law school.

So she went to a sucky law school too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I do think the optics are not good for Fanni. She should not have hired her boyfriend, a man without the experience needed to prosecute the former POTUS. That was a big misstep. But it wasn't illegal. Stupidity isn't illegal unless you break a law. She hasn't, at least not to my knowledge. And even if she has, it has NO BEARING on Trump's alleged crimes.

Doesn't matter. This trial ain't happening until at least 2025 well after the election. That is all DJT wants/nees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A black lawyer couldn’t have possibly earned their own money? Couldn’t possibly afford vacations?

There were 2 other prosecutors brought in on this case, and they’re being paid the same as Wade. But…they’re white, so they earned it. They deserve it.

Give me a f-n break with this.

We have no idea how much they were paid. Fani claims that they were paid the same hourly rate, but how much have they earned from this case since mid-2022?
My guess is it is no where close to $654,000.
Seems that Wade is now the highest paid prosecutor in GA. Sweet deal.

You need to come up with something believable. The goal posts just keep moving. The excuses for being caught lying keep on coming.

The trial will move forward, and Trump and his minions can answer for their criminal conduct. Lawyers try to smear the people involved when the law and the facts are not on their side. The law and the facts are not the side of the people who tried to interfere in an election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the plaintiffs attorneys think Wade isn’t qualified to prosecute felonies, why do they want him removed? He’s done pretty well so far with grand jury indictments, guilty pleas, and defeating plaintiffs’ motions to try to move their cases, claim executive privilege, etc.

+1. If he’s such a bad lawyer, you’d think they’d want to keep him on the case. The intense focus on getting rid of him suggests that he’s been quite effective.

Conflict of interest. Go look it up. Not everything in life is about gaining advantage or unfair advantage.

What’s the conflict? He’s on the same side as his alleged GF. If he was a defendants lawyer and dating the prosecutor, that would be a conflict. But not when they are on the same side.

Not when Wade's girlfriend is the sole and only person approving Wade's bills including numerous charges of 24 hours billing per day and reaping benefits by approving said "24 hours of billing" per day.

The motion doesn't even allege that Willis approves Wade's bills at all, much less that she is the "sole and only person" approving them. In fact, all of them were approved someone with the initials "ATG," which are not Willis' initials. So you're just making that up.

According to the AJC, the DA (Fani Willis) authorizes his compensation.

The bombshell public filing alleged that special prosecutor Nathan Wade, a private attorney, paid for lavish vacations he took with Willis using the Fulton County funds his law firm received. County records show that Wade, who has played a prominent role in the election interference case, has been paid nearly $654,000 in legal fees since January 2022. The DA authorizes his compensation.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-filing-alleges-improper-relationship-between-fulton-da-top-trump-prosecutor/A2N2OWCM7FFWJBQH2ORAK2BKMQ/

In other words, a guy used his salary to take his girlfriend on vacation.

By using the money he received from the government/said girlfriend (billing 24 hours/day on at least 4 occasions) by over-charging/padding his bills so that Fannie the girlfriend can go on expensive vacations with her boyfriend.

I see. So you have never had a bf/gf and would never take them on vacation. Or be taken on vacation with them. Or go on vacation with them.

Not when one is going through a divorce and still married.

[Anonymous]

Should be interesting to see what are in those divorce papers once they are unsealed.