Epstein Files
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Conned. The first step is admitting you have a problem. Mass message tools for voters about how its not a terrible thing to be a victim, provide awareness training via social media without directly finger pointing, and remind voters that if they can forgive the systemic failure of this system, and themselves, we can forgive them, but that means a strict no-tolerance policy for our babies. If that could happen, a new collective could agree to a path forward starting with something bi-partisan you agree upon: the lives of living babies being valued, and that value being something we can mutually define/clarify politically, . Children are innocent and deserve protection from the exploitation of powerful people. A select few do not get the right to normalize acceptance of child rape, coercion, and abuse because they have wealth. You can’t fake influence. There are many forms of currency.. not just $. - Independent |
Anonymous
Anonymous
| I have to say, I am just baffled by this whole thing. It's so completely obvious to me Trump is a rapist and likely incestuous pervert (not an Ivanka fan but I feel for her a touch I think she's |
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Cut me off. Definitely been sexually abused. But this crap has been obvious for a decade+ so why the morality police now? Rape and incest is basically a key part of the MAGA platform. The outrage is surprising. On a separate note, those pics with these teens are damning. Im a woman who probably could have passed for 20 at 14 but...yikes. Those girls look very, very young. |
Anonymous
| Trump doesn’t even know or believe he’s a pedo or rapist. He has excuses and entitlement. MAGA will go right along with him. |
Anonymous
|
I’m 100% confident the list implicates individuals from both major parties—plus celebrities, financiers, and philanthropic elites. It’s not partisan. It’s systemic.
Authorities with access to the Epstein files either sat on them, suffered consequences, or both. And maybe—maybe—there were legitimate national security interests in withholding certain names. But the public is right to question why, and why now. Let’s be clear: if suppression was done to avoid mass destabilization, no political actor should be using the existence of this list as a campaign weapon or fear tactic. That’s not safeguarding the country—that’s weaponizing trauma. A man with no history of public service ran for office promising to “expose it all.” If he had the goods and didn’t deliver, that’s either negligence or manipulation. And if he did deliver and the system buried it? That’s even worse. So now what? If everyone’s on the list, we have two choices: 1. Collapse into chaos and finger-pointing, or 2. Build a new coalition of those committed to truth, repair, and justice. We don’t need “common sense.” We need common integrity—something our institutions have burned through. When the full list emerges—and I believe it eventually will—the question won’t be “who’s on it.” It’ll be: What kind of country are we going to be after the reckoning? - Independent |