So BL allegation is that Wallace/his company was hired by JB and others she is suing to do the social media takedown? Yes I read article linked, but honestly got confused by how written since don’t know all the names to know who is on which side. |
Seeing how she completely refused to apologize to that "little bump" reporter, I don't think it will go as easy as that. She may mention it but place the blame on everyone else. |
If she or JB need mental health assist, they can ring up Prince Harry. Isn’t he still chief mental health officer or something like that for some company? |
Yes. Wallace is known for his unmoral pr tactics. |
She also never actually apologized for the plantation wedding. It was Ryan doing it on behalf of the couple. |
Wow. Just read up on this. Wasn’t really a fan of either but this is a REALLY bad look for Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds. Like holy hell, she was sexting this guy and he basically rejected her.
And she also wants control of these films so she claimed he harassed her and tried to metoo him. When the guy seems to just be a random guy who likes acting and loves his wife and family. What a disgusting tool Blake Lively is. Usually I side with the women in these situations, but cmon. |
What was the sexting part? I think I missed that! |
There was no sexting. Carry on… |
Her language is very much word salad. WTH is she talking about? It sounds like she is describing a full bodied wine or something. That text from her is gross. |
I would NEVER send a coworker a text about my love language and the “without teeth” comment is just gross. It seems like she put herself out there to Justin and he wasn’t feeling her and kept it professional. |
Yes, based on this text, she was SH Justin. She didn’t realize they were supposed to be acting. He was playing a role and so was she supposedly. She’s delusional. It’s sad but maybe she had some postpartum psychosis going on. |
I want to talk about the retaliation claim. I still think Blake's PR mistakes were largely self-inflicted. But reading Blake's complaint, there are some texts confirming Jed Wallace did do work, and if you read Justin's lawsuit, the only thing I get out of that is that they didn't use bots -- which still doesn't mean they couldn't have planted stories.
For example, in a text from Jennifer Abel, according to Blake Lively’s complaint, she says this: “We've also started to see a shift on social, due largely to Jed and his team's efforts to shift the narrative towards shining a spotlight on Blake and Ryan.” What do lawyers have to say to that? Is that problematic for you, or does it still fail to pass muster given that it seems Justin was doing this to protect his reputation and it wasn't in retaliation to the SH claims? |
It's really unclear to me what's immoral and particularly, illegal here. It seems sort of sleezy and dirty to use bots but...is that sanctionable? At the end of the day, even that effort would not have been successful if they didn't have the underlying footage of Lively being absolutely heinous on multiple occasions. To me, whatever they did to boost those views is sort of secondary to the fact that the worst offense is those tapes were available in the first place. |