Another gunman, another elementary school

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.

Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.

So let’s tax the crap out of ammunition and firearms as well as magazines.

So it’s only for elites?
Besides gas nor smokes are part of the US Constitution. Duh.

Speaking of…

Where does a drop out 18 yo who sometimes worked at Wendy’s get $5k for fancy guns and $10k for a tevlar suit.
And his grandmother had a $250k f150 pick up truck??

What’s going on with this dysfunctional family? Cash jobs and gangs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
My office building has an armed guard at the entrance.

Why doesn’t my kid’s school have an armed guard at the entrance?

OMG really? Do you understand the $$ it takes to run a school? Who will pay for that?

The basic safety of our school children is my priority. Why isn’t it yours?

Your children are safer when there are very strict limits on who has access to guns (ie when we have better gun control) not when there’s an armed guard stationed outside the school. All mass shooter has to do is kill/disarm/injure that guard and proceed w their masa shooting. If they didn’t have a gun in the first place it would be much harder for them to kill the guard, enter the school, and kill more people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to live in a country where an armed guard is necessary for my kids to go to school safely. Moreover one armed guard isn’t sufficient. Should we arm the kids next??? This is insanity. It’s guns. It’s choosing to live in a state of warfare vs. peace.

Read the second amendment. “Well regulated” are words that do not mean anything goes.

The disconnect is unreal. It’s the I assume it will not matter to me, take NRA money, look the other way, move on. It’s just 21 families I don’t know and don’t care about.

It's just another school shooting. It's pathetic and scary how some people can seem to shrug and carry on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Um, criminals will ALWAYS get a way to commit “mass” murder. They do NOT obey laws.

Until he pulled that trigger, he had yet to commit a crime.

The gun was bought legally.

How do you even walk through the front door of a school without being buzzed in? By security or least a receptionist?

During Covid all these public schools monitored doorways for certain classrooms.

Now all of the sudden you can walk in in a police body suite with mass assault rifles and not a peep?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.

Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.

I hope that some states start requiring bullets and belt cost exorbitantly. We have to start somewhere.

Please collectively don’t talk to the guy ranting about fentanyl. Lets keep this on topic.

Stopping guns among criminals would be like stopping fentanyl among drug addicts. Please tell us how it’d be any different.

This shooter wasn’t a criminal until he started blasting the faces off little kids. All the shooters were law abiding citizens until they took aim and fired.

We dont know his record. It has not been disclosed as clean or not clean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.

Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.

I hope that some states start requiring bullets and belt cost exorbitantly. We have to start somewhere.

Please collectively don’t talk to the guy ranting about fentanyl. Lets keep this on topic.

Stopping guns among criminals would be like stopping fentanyl among drug addicts. Please tell us how it’d be any different.

This shooter wasn’t a criminal until he started blasting the faces off little kids. All the shooters were law abiding citizens until they took aim and fired.

He did come from a fatherless home, like most criminals.

And had a ton of cash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can states require that ammunition/bullets be prohibitively expensive with no shipment to other states? Is there stuff that can be done by some states to try and protect? It’s obviously not a fleshed out idea. I just feel like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks at this point.

Of course they can. Check out gas and cigarette taxes.

I hope that some states start requiring bullets and belt cost exorbitantly. We have to start somewhere.

Please collectively don’t talk to the guy ranting about fentanyl. Lets keep this on topic.

Stopping guns among criminals would be like stopping fentanyl among drug addicts. Please tell us how it’d be any different.

This shooter wasn’t a criminal until he started blasting the faces off little kids. All the shooters were law abiding citizens until they took aim and fired.

He did come from a fatherless home, like most criminals.

And violent and aggressive towards his mother so had been kicked out recently. And flunking out/ repeat a grade. But was usually absent so not sure what was expected there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?

Is there some company on here that is in the biz of supplying school guards? We want to get rid of the guns...not bring more of them into our schools. How many times do we need to say the same thing. Learn to read.

Why don't you want guards with guns in school again? Who is supposed to kill the deranged person before they shoot any kids? What are you expecting to happen if there is nobody there with a gun when the place is breached?

If the deranged person doesn’t have a gun, there is NO NEED for a guard with a gun!

Well while you get that all sorted out, is it okay if guard the kids?

Look, deadly school shootings are the primary tool in the gun control debate. A sudden decrease in mass killings attributable to an increase in armed guards would be disastrous for our cause.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?

Is there some company on here that is in the biz of supplying school guards? We want to get rid of the guns...not bring more of them into our schools. How many times do we need to say the same thing. Learn to read.

Why don't you want guards with guns in school again? Who is supposed to kill the deranged person before they shoot any kids? What are you expecting to happen if there is nobody there with a gun when the place is breached?

If the deranged person doesn’t have a gun, there is NO NEED for a guard with a gun!

Well while you get that all sorted out, is it okay if guard the kids?

Look, deadly school shootings are the primary tool in the gun control debate. A sudden decrease in mass killings attributable to an increase in armed guards would be disastrous for our cause.

Why don’t we do what has been proven to nearly eliminate mass shootings altogether?

[Anonymous]

Switzerland has a ton of guns per capita. But they are highly highly regulated (with strict background checks) and they haven’t had a mass shooting in 20 years. Let’s try their way!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?

Is there some company on here that is in the biz of supplying school guards? We want to get rid of the guns...not bring more of them into our schools. How many times do we need to say the same thing. Learn to read.

Why don't you want guards with guns in school again? Who is supposed to kill the deranged person before they shoot any kids? What are you expecting to happen if there is nobody there with a gun when the place is breached?

If the deranged person doesn’t have a gun, there is NO NEED for a guard with a gun!

Well while you get that all sorted out, is it okay if guard the kids?

Look, deadly school shootings are the primary tool in the gun control debate. A sudden decrease in mass killings attributable to an increase in armed guards would be disastrous for our cause.

Why don’t we do what has been proven to nearly eliminate mass shootings altogether?

Gated driveways to schools, check ins desk to enter door. Like a private school or office.

If that doesn’t work, metal detectors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Switzerland has a ton of guns per capita. But they are highly highly regulated (with strict background checks) and they haven’t had a mass shooting in 20 years. Let’s try their way!

No rampant illegal immigration, gangs, and 50% literacy rates there either. USA has all three.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?

Is there some company on here that is in the biz of supplying school guards? We want to get rid of the guns...not bring more of them into our schools. How many times do we need to say the same thing. Learn to read.

Why don't you want guards with guns in school again? Who is supposed to kill the deranged person before they shoot any kids? What are you expecting to happen if there is nobody there with a gun when the place is breached?

If the deranged person doesn’t have a gun, there is NO NEED for a guard with a gun!

Well while you get that all sorted out, is it okay if guard the kids?

Look, deadly school shootings are the primary tool in the gun control debate. A sudden decrease in mass killings attributable to an increase in armed guards would be disastrous for our cause.

Why don’t we do what has been proven to nearly eliminate mass shootings altogether?

Gated driveways to schools, check ins desk to enter door. Like a private school or office.

If that doesn’t work, metal detectors.

Then theyll shoot them at malls, church or parades.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Schools now HAVE 211 Billion unspent covid dollars. Let’s see if some of that can be used to get a highly trained armed guard in every public school that wants one. It could even be a veteran or retired cop. Why not?

Is there some company on here that is in the biz of supplying school guards? We want to get rid of the guns...not bring more of them into our schools. How many times do we need to say the same thing. Learn to read.

Why don't you want guards with guns in school again? Who is supposed to kill the deranged person before they shoot any kids? What are you expecting to happen if there is nobody there with a gun when the place is breached?

If the deranged person doesn’t have a gun, there is NO NEED for a guard with a gun!

Well while you get that all sorted out, is it okay if guard the kids?

Look, deadly school shootings are the primary tool in the gun control debate. A sudden decrease in mass killings attributable to an increase in armed guards would be disastrous for our cause.

Bingo!

[Anonymous]