Is Matt Gaetz the next in a long line of prominent republicans to be convicted of child sex abuse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/rep-matt-gaetz-oped-the-swamp-is-out-to-drown-me-with-false-charges-but-im-not-giving-up

CAPITOL VIEWS - OPINION
Rep. Matt Gaetz: The swamp is out to drown me with false charges, but I'm not giving up

By Rep. Matt Gaetz
April 5, 2021 - 11:32 AM

“I want to be clear about something as we process the leaks and lies from the past week. To this point, there are exactly zero credible (or even non-credible) accusers willing to come forward by name and state on the public record that I behaved improperly toward them, in the manner by which Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo has ten accusers.“

Matt denies underage sex accusations. If he can be proven to have had sex with a 17 year old, charge him.

The reason no one is coming forward publicly is because it is all in grand jury right now. Duh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As in the Hunter Biden thread: there is an investigation going on. If they find cause to charge him, so be it.

Exactly. I'm confident the investigators will figure this out.

Seriously. People here don’t personally know these politicians or people. They could be guilty as heck or innocent. We don’t have an inside info. Let the investigation be done and quit pretending we all know what Matt and Hunter have been up to.

Joel Greenberg has already been charged. Gaetz transferred money to the same woman as Greenberg. The woman told investigators the money was for sex. According to the paper, they are just trying to ascertain whether Gaetz had sex for money with the 17 year old as well as the adult.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/02/us/politics/matt-gaetz-investigation.html?searchResultPosition=3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/rep-matt-gaetz-oped-the-swamp-is-out-to-drown-me-with-false-charges-but-im-not-giving-up

CAPITOL VIEWS - OPINION
Rep. Matt Gaetz: The swamp is out to drown me with false charges, but I'm not giving up

By Rep. Matt Gaetz
April 5, 2021 - 11:32 AM

“I want to be clear about something as we process the leaks and lies from the past week. To this point, there are exactly zero credible (or even non-credible) accusers willing to come forward by name and state on the public record that I behaved improperly toward them, in the manner by which Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo has ten accusers.“

Matt denies underage sex accusations. If he can be proven to have had sex with a 17 year old, charge him.

The reason no one is coming forward publicly is because it is all in grand jury right now. Duh.

And minors and victims of sex crimes aren’t usually identified.

[Anonymous]

" Matt denies underage sex accusations. If he can be proven to have had sex with a 17 year old, charge him."

That's exactly what they are going to do, and your friend, Matt, is well aware of this and of his own prior acts.

Wonder who will represent him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: " Matt denies underage sex accusations. If he can be proven to have had sex with a 17 year old, charge him."

That's exactly what they are going to do, and your friend, Matt, is well aware of this and of his own prior acts.

Wonder who will represent him?

I think it’s weird people make such oddly personal comments on an anonymous forum. If he’s charged he’s charged, and I don’t know him. Politicians aren’t our friends. They care about their power and their careers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: " Matt denies underage sex accusations. If he can be proven to have had sex with a 17 year old, charge him."

That's exactly what they are going to do, and your friend, Matt, is well aware of this and of his own prior acts.

Wonder who will represent him?

Dershowitzs has a personal vested interest to do so.

[Anonymous]

Matt Gaetz, after a brief hiatus, realized he couldn't detrumpify himself and remain quiet about his underage sex allegations. It appeared for a brief moment that daddy had hired lawyers to keep him from shooting himself in both feet by continuing to incriminate himself in public. Apparently Matt concluded that showing the world what a POS he is would be a better strategy. Love it. Matt, keep showing everyone who Matt Gaetz and the republican party are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I gotta say, kidz r freaking awesome!!!!!

A mini dcumer. Face crinkled up and unsmiling; the most unhappy looking child in the crowd. Brava, indeed.

Gotta be a trump/gaetz trash loser to come on anonymous boards to trash little kids. Par for the course for trump/gaetz pedo bootlickers. Glad to know that they exist even in dcum land, not just in backwater flyover land.

A little kid who is flipping off a camera in elementary/middle school is inappropriate. The child looks unhappy and is not smiling. The poor child probably has an unhappy home and her parents have modeled poor behavior. It’s not something to read into politically and it’s gross to pretend the child is making a political statement that mirrors yours.

Project much?

That child is more intelligent and authentic than you will ever be.

[Anonymous]

“Leaks” suggest truth and more of it incoming. What did Matt Gaetz do?

[Anonymous]

The DOJ is coming for me?
Wow that’s news!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Leaks” suggest truth and more of it incoming. What did Matt Gaetz do?

NOt sure about you guys, but i feel so much better knowing Matt Gaetz is looking out for me.

[Anonymous]

This might be a DCUM first-- no one is playing "but what about" here. Bravo! MG must truly be a "deplorable among deplorables".

[Anonymous]

If this were Trump and the accusations the same there would be a TON of twisting to make this not so bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This might be a DCUM first-- no one is playing "but what about" here. Bravo! MG must truly be a "deplorable among deplorables".

Most sane persons wait for the outcome of an investigation and see if the person is charged and then a trial and a conviction before they start pronouncing guilt. We’ve seen too many dcum judge and jury threads that have been wildly wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This might be a DCUM first-- no one is playing "but what about" here. Bravo! MG must truly be a "deplorable among deplorables".

Most sane persons wait for the outcome of an investigation and see if the person is charged and then a trial and a conviction before they start pronouncing guilt. We’ve seen too many dcum judge and jury threads that have been wildly wrong.

It's true. After I was raped, I anxiously awaited the outcome of the multi-year investigation, trial and appeal to find out if my rapist was guilty.