This is a very common sense perspective and a good compromise. |
If they are going to mandate opening, they should pay for teachers/staff sick leave as well as all medical costs and the same for kids who don't have health insurance. I wonder how many teachers will quit and how they will quickly replace them. The pro-opening now parents should step up and fill the spots. |
Personally I'm impressed by the virus's reading ability. "Oh, crap -- this is a SCHOOL and not another multihour-a-day gathering of people indoors during a pandemic? LOL! I feel so silly. My bad. I'll just move on down the street." |
Wow. We're going to need some citations for this incredible claim. Please make sure they're specific and provide proof that they are directly resultant from school buildings being closed. Thanks. We're all ears. |
This has nothing to do with federal employees. Fed mom is a little over the top. No one in FCCPS is weighing nationwide consequences against school reopening. Nor is anyone dying due to fed mom’s teleworking. It’s absurd. |
Hey, Fed, you cannot be this dumb. No, the "longer we wait," the more people are vaccinated and the more we get through the next several weeks (not just two, if you know anything about COVID disease progression) that are going to be an even greater blazing dumpster fire thanks to all the entitled idiots who traveled and gathered for the holidays. THEN it will be less scary. Opening now is not "reality." It's idiocy. |
The problem with that is that we aren’t doing the vaccine rollout at warp speed. We are doing it at snail crawl. And health providers are supposed to the easy part. Because the federal rollout is about as competent as the federal testing rollout, which 10 months later still isn’t fixed. |
Yes, but I think it is a bit presumptuous to assume the vaccine rollout would speed up significantly if schools opened. |
Lol, Peter Noonan? No. Definitely not. |
This was well-stated and something I hadn't considered (and I want my kids back in school and support Noonan's decision). |
Let’s not forget it is OPTIONAL for parents to send their kids in person. Distance Learning is still available. With the hybrid model, there is a max of ~8 kids per class with lots of distancing for less than 3 hours. Teachers also have the option to take unpaid leave and return to their jobs next year which is more than generous, especially since there’s a large market for in person or virtual tutoring. This is a difficult situation for all, but nobody is flipping a switch and having ALL return to schools at once. |
High school classes are commonly in the high 20s or even 30. People are not as worried about transmission in the classroom as they about transmission during all of the unsupervised time switching classes. Yes, students have a choice to stay home. In reality, you can’t not notify HR you are taking leave and they say, see you next year! Teachers only have so much control and it only takes one student to not follow the rules to infect your entire class. We can have the best classroom management but this is a lot to risk in classrooms without windows that open. |
teaching in schools does not have the luxury of working from home. If you wanted to do that go work for the university of phoenix, part of your job is to watch the kids. If you can't watch the kids, parents are not getting the full benefits of public schools and must be compensated for the lack of services because they will be on the hook for the lack of in-person supervision. Public schools are failing to provide 50%+ of the services they are required to perform. |
Good point about High School. Clearly a elementary school parent with very small class sizes and no switching rooms. For the 4 days of in person hybrid, it felt like minimal risk. I’ll clarify my comment was geared towards the lower grades. |
So wait You don’t get one part of the “service” (someone else babysitting your kids) And you expect a FULL “refund” as compensation for... ??? Y’all are nuts lol |