That is true of course. But the point of the special, test-in programs is to give kids the opportunity to an education they may not normally find at their local HS. And kids at privates already have that. |
|
For students that have been in MCPS since early elementary (2nd grade GT screening) they will have plenty of data to compare students against other students both within their home school cohort and against other applicants. But there are also plenty of kids who move into MCPS after 2nd grade or who didn't apply in 3rd or 5th grades for a magnet and don't have standards based scores. Those students will be harder to evaluate, and recent MAP and current grades will matter more.
I suspect that for all of the programs, there is going to be several different ways to examine the data and that outliers can be found each way. For ES and MS, they can be a little more generous in identifying good candidates and just let the lottery narrow the lists down. HS is going to be tough for the committees, I think. |
Why is that really MCPS problem? Why would MCPS really cares about non-MCPS students? It's up to them to make sure they meet whatever criterias MCPS required, not for MCPS to bent over to accommodate them. |
No, they don't |
Thats their choice to go to private. They could have gone to public. |
You're right. That PP is nuts. It's super easy to increase MAP scores, at least in Math, just by learning more math. You can prep for the CogAT, but you shouldn't be able to increase your score as much as you can on MAP. |
I believe that whatever data they have (previous MAP, Cogat, grades, etc), it is better to consider them holistically rather than any lottery. |
Try looking at the differences between Sidwell and just one of the MS in Silver Spring and think again. |
Where did you get this from?
|
She said she got it from an email didn't she? Its a slightly garbled version of the HS magnet update email I got. |
|
Why a lottery for elementary and middle but no lottery for high school? Why can't they do whatever they were planning on doing for high school to elementary and middle school? I hate lotteries. I'd rather my kid be rejected on merit than rejected because he had the intellect but lost out on a game of chance. |
My understanding is that there are more seats in HS, and maybe somewhat less interest with the availability of APs in the home school. Too many qualified kids not enough seats in ES and MS, hence the lottery. I’d rather they just did a balance of school distribution and tippy top scores within each school. |
I don't know. There's lots of randomness in the merit process too. At least with the lottery they're just flat out admitting it instead of pretending there's a method to the madness. |
I agree, with a bit more seats given to schools with CES, since otherwise they'll lose out on the school distribution side of things. |
This is exactly my feeling too. I think at least for MS magnets, there is enough data in students' academic history portfolio to make a holistic review. Furthermore as someone else already pointed out, lottery would probably reduce magnets' appeal, which would not be good considering that one of the reasons MCPS started those programs at those schools was to draw high performing students. |