Rachel of "Girl, wash your Face" and Dave Hollis ending marriage

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surprised nobody is discussing her white privilege rant about how she does not want to be relatable and she's proud to hire a sweet lady to clean her toilets. The internet is explosing on IG and TikTok and yet "sis" still has 1.7million (purchased perhaps?) followers or it's just another example about white privilege let's you be an ass over and over and never get cancelled.

I honestly don’t get why people are upset about this. It’s obvious she’s rich. I would assume someone like her has a cleaner and a nanny. Lots of less wealthy people do. Who cares?

No one cares that she is rich. No one cares that she has people cleaning her house. Hell, I'm not rich, and I have that. It's everything else about her personal - her curated life - her making a living of off telling people if they dream it they can do it (without recognizing that she came from an extremely privileged start - not everyone can afford to not work and hope insta postings take off).

The purpose of the post seemed good though - I think it would be worse if she was pretending to do it all when in reality she has so many employees.

Agree that it's nice she actually acknowledges all her help - vs. someone like Joanna Gaines who when she was coming up wanted us all to believe her toddlers were at her knees just below camera in every shot - newsflash if you've worked on a reality tv show or any kind of TV show, it's hours of waiting and lighting and reshoots and no one is parenting a toddler during that time.

But anyway, I don't think that is what is annoying people. What started this whole thing is that a commenter called her unrelatable. If she had just let it go we wouldn't all be talking about this but instead she gets on and rants about it and sounds a little unhinged to use an over-used DCUM term. And what she said struck people the wrong way, because her whole thing is again, you can just make it happen if you it, without acknowledging her INSANE privilege.

But I think the core issue is that she let the facade slip - she cares a lot about what people think - that is the core of why every influencer is an influencer - it's all curated. The buzzfeed article called it a whole genre of "perfectly imperfect" motherhood. She wants you to believe she is imperfect so you will relate, but her imperfections are highly controlled and curated and not at all authentic.

[Anonymous]

I think people also took offense to her rant because she tried to make it sound like she is successful because she worked hard, got up at 4am and all the BS. She wants people to believe that that she came from nothing and built her empire. When in reality she had a lot of help and privilege along the way. He now ex-husband was an executive at Disney so I can bet she met the right people and had a lot of help along the way not to mention she could take risks because even if she failed she was still loaded. And don't even get me started on how she built her brand on her "exceptional" marriage, going on about how if you weren't having sex twice a day your marriage was weak. Then got divorced and had a book out a month later.

It is also offensive the she had money because she worked hard. When a lot of people work insanely hard/harder than she ever will and are still living in poverty and unable to support their families.

She is all around a disgusting person.
Oh an there is the fact the she had 3 son, but "god" was calling her to have a daughter so she bought one.

[Anonymous]

Literally her having/hiring help was not the point of the outrage. At all.

She's deleted the posts now. Not sure how I feel about that but I suppose it at least reflects a recognition that it was a whole entire shit show.

[Anonymous]

I’m offended at her eyebrows. Girl...

[Anonymous]

To the person wondering about losing followers - looks like she had 1.7 million before the rant and now has 1.6 million. So I'm guessing that is why she finally took the post down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think people also took offense to her rant because she tried to make it sound like she is successful because she worked hard, got up at 4am and all the BS. She wants people to believe that that she came from nothing and built her empire. When in reality she had a lot of help and privilege along the way. He now ex-husband was an executive at Disney so I can bet she met the right people and had a lot of help along the way not to mention she could take risks because even if she failed she was still loaded. And don't even get me started on how she built her brand on her "exceptional" marriage, going on about how if you weren't having sex twice a day your marriage was weak. Then got divorced and had a book out a month later.

It is also offensive the she had money because she worked hard. When a lot of people work insanely hard/harder than she ever will and are still living in poverty and unable to support their families.

She is all around a disgusting person.
Oh an there is the fact the she had 3 son, but "god" was calling her to have a daughter so she bought one.

It was that, plus the combo of her video and the caption, which basically had her comparing herself to Harriet Tubman and RBG. She's a lunatic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Then got divorced and had a book out a month later.

Excuse me, "ended her marriage." Divorce is for relatable people, those lazy proles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's a fraud. Good for her she made money, but I find her whole thing offensive.

Right?? Me too.

Me three!! I hate this genre of female writing. It’s embarrassing and dumb.

[Anonymous]

The disconnect of both shitting on her fan base, while grouping herself with human rights warriors, scientists, literal barrier breaking women is just so over the top and tone deaf. All the while being pissed. Brava!

“F yeah you can’t relate to me! I’m in this group of badass history making women!”

“Oh my team said I should apologize, even though I’m not sorry. Please buy my books!”

Classic

[Anonymous]

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/style/rachel-hollis-tiktok-video.html

Well RH went from NYT Best Seller to the NYT writing an article about her labeled “Girl, wash your timeline.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surprised nobody is discussing her white privilege rant about how she does not want to be relatable and she's proud to hire a sweet lady to clean her toilets. The internet is explosing on IG and TikTok and yet "sis" still has 1.7million (purchased perhaps?) followers or it's just another example about white privilege let's you be an ass over and over and never get cancelled.

I honestly don’t get why people are upset about this. It’s obvious she’s rich. I would assume someone like her has a cleaner and a nanny. Lots of less wealthy people do. Who cares?

No one cares that she is rich. No one cares that she has people cleaning her house. Hell, I'm not rich, and I have that. It's everything else about her personal - her curated life - her making a living of off telling people if they dream it they can do it (without recognizing that she came from an extremely privileged start - not everyone can afford to not work and hope insta postings take off).

The purpose of the post seemed good though - I think it would be worse if she was pretending to do it all when in reality she has so many employees.

Agree that it's nice she actually acknowledges all her help - vs. someone like Joanna Gaines who when she was coming up wanted us all to believe her toddlers were at her knees just below camera in every shot - newsflash if you've worked on a reality tv show or any kind of TV show, it's hours of waiting and lighting and reshoots and no one is parenting a toddler during that time.

But anyway, I don't think that is what is annoying people. What started this whole thing is that a commenter called her unrelatable. If she had just let it go we wouldn't all be talking about this but instead she gets on and rants about it and sounds a little unhinged to use an over-used DCUM term. And what she said struck people the wrong way, because her whole thing is again, you can just make it happen if you it, without acknowledging her INSANE privilege.

But I think the core issue is that she let the facade slip - she cares a lot about what people think - that is the core of why every influencer is an influencer - it's all curated. The buzzfeed article called it a whole genre of "perfectly imperfect" motherhood. She wants you to believe she is imperfect so you will relate, but her imperfections are highly controlled and curated and not at all authentic.

Yeah, this. There are some people who are worked up that she hires somebody to clean her house, but that is super rare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/style/rachel-hollis-tiktok-video.html

Well RH went from NYT Best Seller to the NYT writing an article about her labeled “Girl, wash your timeline.”

I just read this and had to cackle in parts. Oy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/style/rachel-hollis-tiktok-video.html

Well RH went from NYT Best Seller to the NYT writing an article about her labeled “Girl, wash your timeline.”

I just read this and had to cackle in parts. Oy.

Agree, its pretty awesome

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/29/style/rachel-hollis-tiktok-video.html

Well RH went from NYT Best Seller to the NYT writing an article about her labeled “Girl, wash your timeline.”

I am not bothered by her privilege (I would like a housekeeper 24/7).
I am bothered by her demeaning attitude towards those that do what she perceives as “undesirable work”. Her emphatic affirmation that she works hard so she can have someone clean her toilets insinuates that the cleaning person is not worthy and not a hard worker so therefore she’s only good to clean toilets.

[Anonymous]

Girl, read your Bible.