Sarah Huckabee Sanders' new look

[Anonymous]

And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

[Anonymous]

SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

Huh? It’s very unprofessional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

Huh? It’s very unprofessional.

No. And I dislike her intensely. To be honest, her clothes are clueless but her hair and figure and face are fine. The truly unprofessional part is the makeup which is far too “evening” for her job.

[Anonymous]

No, the truly unprofessional part is non-stop lying.

[Anonymous]

She is looking great lately!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, the truly unprofessional part is non-stop lying.

Exactly. I don’t care what she looks like or what she wears. The thing I do care about is the truth and she is terrible at telling the truth. What does she tell her kids about what she does at work, I wonder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.

No way. Most guys aren't attracted to women with one lazy eye and another that droops.

[Anonymous]

Her clothes look fine.
I hate that she has ruined wearing pearls for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.

No way. Most guys aren't attracted to women with one lazy eye and another that droops.

I agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SHS is the kind of woman who would be considered attractive (if plump) in any normal workplace.

No way. Most guys aren't attracted to women with one lazy eye and another that droops.

I agree.

Yes. I hate that I know this but she has the same gorked eyes as Pauly D/Jersey Shore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

Huh? It’s very unprofessional.

Long hair in your 30s isn't unprofessional. Come out of the dark ages.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

Huh? It’s very unprofessional.

Long hair in your 30s isn't unprofessional. Come out of the dark ages.

Hmm approaching 30 and I have long hair that I maintain very well, loose curls, straighten or in a bun.

[Anonymous]

Lots of women trash talking another woman here. Wow