Keep that cute little building and put the school behind it. Hold the project until the county does some long-term facilities planning. |
Uh oh... looks like someone bought a crap shack in Westover. |
^^ I just sold my "crapshack" in Westover for $950,000.
Crap is good!! |
Man, are there any deals to be had anymore? Wish I had a time machine. |
|
Rezoning is going to happen. With Reed coming online in three years, there will absolutely have to be a wholesale rezoning, even if it has some choice component to it. Personally, I can see a shift in units clockwise across north Arlington -- McKinley, Reed, Tuckahoe, Nottingham, Glebe, Discovery, Jamestown, Taylor, ASFS, and maybe even Long Branch and Ashlawn around the edges. Yes, ASFS will absorb some Taylor units when it becomes a neighborhood school, but nothing that says those Rosslyn units couldn't also be bussed to Taylor as easily as to Science Focus. ASFS would lose some diversity, but not all. And Taylor, who has some of the most vocal and pearl-clutching parents around, would gain some much needed diversity.
http://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/ES_PU_2016.pdf |
| Funny, looking at the map, it would make sense to put a choice program at Nottingham when Reed opens. It's underenrolled and the boundary shifts would be easy. |
| Dumb question- Is this whole thing being triggered by not enough kids having access to immersion? |
I've heard Lander say that...but is that true? Did Key and Claremont have long waiting lists? |
|
I think it's being triggered because some parents see the word "science" in the name and think it's more of a thing than it really is and get pissed off because they don't have it as a choice school. 1 hour more science per week doesn't really seem like a big deal to me. Change the name of the school, make it a neighborhood school and be done with the whole thing.
frankly, the people who don't have access to immersion because Claremont is effectively a neighborhood school should be more pissed than people who want an extra hour of science. |
They do have long wait lists. All the choice programs do. But that's not what this is about, though I'm not surprised to hear that Lander was trying to paint this as a small group of people with a narrow focus/interest rather than admitting that the policies were never meant to remain static and should've been updated years ago because they no longer made sense nor functioned as they were intended. Much like the capacity issue, the SB kicked the can on updating the policies. The update is long overdue. |
This. It's the name that's the problem. A PP mentioned that some people there think it's super-special and others think it's just a neighborhood school with some extra science. I'd guess the super-special people are also those who are very invested in the brand name and it making them/their kids look like they are super-special too. |
Or just add "Science" to the name of every school, given that almost all of them are going to be STEMish now. Maybe that would make people see how stupid it is to create a focus for elementary schools, or at least to impose it on all of them. I want my kids to have recess and hands-on experiences (not necessarily PBL) and unstructured time. I don't want everything filtered through science. |
|
I wish I could get a clearer picture of ASFS. On one hand, you have people saying it's just a neighborhood school (not for it's own neighborhood - ha!) that has one extra hour of science. It's really no different that any other school.
On the other hand, you have people who talk about how it's special & award winning and that the science lab makes it "better" than other schools. Aren't a lot of Arl. elementary schools award winning? Mine is. I don't have kids going there, but I wish I could understand this situation a little better. |
I don't get the history on the science lab there. I hear it was something that parents did extensive fundraising to put in. However, parent fundraising is not supposed to be for things that are integral to instruction or will create an ongoing obligation for the district. Which it sounds like this lab is both. The reason for those rules is to limit inequity due to wealth across the district. Is that a new rule? Or just completely ignored in this case? |
|
I am vindictive enough to relish the idea of ASFS becoming a neighborhood school for its actual neighborhood and all the striver parents who raised funds for the science lab having to bid it farewell.
And we're in Key/ASFS. There are some nice/normal ASFS parents, but there are also quiet a few who need to be hosed down. |