Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

It's definitely suspicious that she won't admit to any wrongdoing at all. I mean everyone knows there was fault on both sides. More people would find her believable if she owned up to her part. Why is she trying to play the perpetual victim? She's taking a page out of Danni's book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kane and IJ and their minions are inhere overtime trying to make Kane look good and spread lies about N. Not a good looks Kane. Maybe spend more time on yourself rather than doing anything to slam N and try to ruin her reputation, and then you’ll be happy too.

Welcome back Mama nubes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kane and IJ and their minions are inhere overtime trying to make Kane look good and spread lies about N. Not a good looks Kane. Maybe spend more time on yourself rather than doing anything to slam N and try to ruin her reputation, and then you’ll be happy too.

Welcome back Mama nubes.

Whatever. It’s so ridiculous you can’t stop posting here IJ. Worried that Kane is going to continue to lose fan support and ratings?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's definitely suspicious that she won't admit to any wrongdoing at all. I mean everyone knows there was fault on both sides. More people would find her believable if she owned up to her part. Why is she trying to play the perpetual victim? She's taking a page out of Danni's book.

He doesn't admit to any wrong doing either

[Anonymous]

You can tell it’s mama nubes when the grammar is just a touch off, lol. I agree that Kane and Natasha both failed miserably to take accountability for their actions. Kane absolutely should not have discussed the reasons behind the split on the air. He should’ve left it at “we tried our hardest, we couldn’t make it work, please respect our privacy.” Natasha should not have blogged about it, either. “Tit for tat” motivation isn’t excusable when you’re an adult and there are children involved. They both behaved horribly. Kane has stopped referencing Natasha, I hope she does the same & focuses on her new life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kane and IJ and their minions are inhere overtime trying to make Kane look good and spread lies about N. Not a good looks Kane. Maybe spend more time on yourself rather than doing anything to slam N and try to ruin her reputation, and then you’ll be happy too.

PREACH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like Kane and IJ and their minions are inhere overtime trying to make Kane look good and spread lies about N. Not a good looks Kane. Maybe spend more time on yourself rather than doing anything to slam N and try to ruin her reputation, and then you’ll be happy too.

Welcome back Mama nubes.

Whatever. It’s so ridiculous you can’t stop posting here IJ. Worried that Kane is going to continue to lose fan support and ratings?

Seriously the mama nubes bit is beyond old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's definitely suspicious that she won't admit to any wrongdoing at all. I mean everyone knows there was fault on both sides. More people would find her believable if she owned up to her part. Why is she trying to play the perpetual victim? She's taking a page out of Danni's book.

He doesn't admit to any wrong doing either

What I find odd is that you're saying she won't admit to any wrongdoing when I don't believe she's even commented on that. She never says she wasn't wrong at all, she actually doesn't address that at all. YOU are drawing that conclusion to suit your narrative when she hasn't made any such statement.

Did you guys have a coffee break before recording more fake bits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's definitely suspicious that she won't admit to any wrongdoing at all. I mean everyone knows there was fault on both sides. More people would find her believable if she owned up to her part. Why is she trying to play the perpetual victim? She's taking a page out of Danni's book.

He doesn't admit to any wrong doing either

What I find odd is that you're saying she won't admit to any wrongdoing when I don't believe she's even commented on that. She never says she wasn't wrong at all, she actually doesn't address that at all. YOU are drawing that conclusion to suit your narrative when she hasn't made any such statement.

Did you guys have a coffee break before recording more fake bits?

Is it that hard to believe that some of the readers are DCUM that are not Kane or IJ don't believe and/or agree with her? It's odd that you assume that everyone who doesn't voice support for her must be her ex-husband.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's definitely suspicious that she won't admit to any wrongdoing at all. I mean everyone knows there was fault on both sides. More people would find her believable if she owned up to her part. Why is she trying to play the perpetual victim? She's taking a page out of Danni's book.

He doesn't admit to any wrong doing either

What I find odd is that you're saying she won't admit to any wrongdoing when I don't believe she's even commented on that. She never says she wasn't wrong at all, she actually doesn't address that at all. YOU are drawing that conclusion to suit your narrative when she hasn't made any such statement.

Did you guys have a coffee break before recording more fake bits?

Is it that hard to believe that some of the readers are DCUM that are not Kane or IJ don't believe and/or agree with her? It's odd that you assume that everyone who doesn't voice support for her must be her ex-husband.

It's just as odd you assume everyone who doesn't kiss his butt is "Mama Nubes".

[Anonymous]

It’s rather telling that she (IIRC) has never come out and definitively said the allegations of hitting the car, taking the money, etc are false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s rather telling that she (IIRC) has never come out and definitively said the allegations of hitting the car, taking the money, etc are false.

Did you read her blog? She pretty much implied it if not said it outright. And who knows what kind of NDA is involved in their divorce.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s rather telling that she (IIRC) has never come out and definitively said the allegations of hitting the car, taking the money, etc are false.

Did you read her blog? She pretty much implied it if not said it outright. And who knows what kind of NDA is involved in their divorce.

The kind of NDA that says she can trash talk him on social media? Please. There's no NDA. No alimony and he got custody so she lost out on a big child support check.

She has to keep the new husband happy but the old one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s rather telling that she (IIRC) has never come out and definitively said the allegations of hitting the car, taking the money, etc are false.

Did you read her blog? She pretty much implied it if not said it outright. And who knows what kind of NDA is involved in their divorce.

The kind of NDA that says she can trash talk him on social media? Please. There's no NDA. No alimony and he got custody so she lost out on a big child support check.

She has to keep the new husband happy but the old one?

Oh snap. This actually makes sense and would also explain why she got knocked up and remarried so quickly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s rather telling that she (IIRC) has never come out and definitively said the allegations of hitting the car, taking the money, etc are false.

Did you read her blog? She pretty much implied it if not said it outright. And who knows what kind of NDA is involved in their divorce.

The kind of NDA that says she can trash talk him on social media? Please. There's no NDA. No alimony and he got custody so she lost out on a big child support check.

She has to keep the new husband happy but the old one?

Yeah right, which is why he's trying to silence her. Kinda funny he's worried about her small social media following and blog. Gotta keep up those appearances!

P.s. he doesn't have full custody.