Do you display photos of your kids in your own home?

[Anonymous]

I think this also applies to Facebook. I find displaying too many pictures of yourself as really odd and show offy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have my kid's pic tatooed on my ass. Does that make me high class because nobody can see it? 8)

LOVE your sense of humor!

[Anonymous]

If it's your house, can't you put up whatever you want, wherever you want?

[Anonymous]

smiley525 wrote:I definitely display photos of my kids and my clients that spend $1,000 plus for wall art display their kids too (I'm a photographer). Depends how they are displayed and on what type of material (Canvas, float wrap, etc)

Sorry, I can't help but comment that $1,000 is not much for "wall art." It certainly doesn't show that someone is upper class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

smiley525 wrote:I definitely display photos of my kids and my clients that spend $1,000 plus for wall art display their kids too (I'm a photographer). Depends how they are displayed and on what type of material (Canvas, float wrap, etc)

Sorry, I can't help but comment that $1,000 is not much for "wall art." It certainly doesn't show that someone is upper class.

You are the only one who thinks this way. Everyone else who posts on DCUM looking for a custom photographer wants to spend no more than $300 on the whole shebang, not just the wall art.

I'm not the PP you responded to, BTW

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

smiley525 wrote:I definitely display photos of my kids and my clients that spend $1,000 plus for wall art display their kids too (I'm a photographer). Depends how they are displayed and on what type of material (Canvas, float wrap, etc)

Sorry, I can't help but comment that $1,000 is not much for "wall art." It certainly doesn't show that someone is upper class.

You are the only one who thinks this way. Everyone else who posts on DCUM looking for a custom photographer wants to spend no more than $300 on the whole shebang, not just the wall art.

I'm not the PP you responded to, BTW

I was referring to "wall art" -- paintings, etc. -- not the photography session. I supposed I wouldn't spend $1,000 on a family photograph, but $1,000 is what you would expect to pay for an emerging artist's work and much cheaper than you would expect a wealthy person to pay for art by established artists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

smiley525 wrote:I definitely display photos of my kids and my clients that spend $1,000 plus for wall art display their kids too (I'm a photographer). Depends how they are displayed and on what type of material (Canvas, float wrap, etc)

Sorry, I can't help but comment that $1,000 is not much for "wall art." It certainly doesn't show that someone is upper class.

You are the only one who thinks this way. Everyone else who posts on DCUM looking for a custom photographer wants to spend no more than $300 on the whole shebang, not just the wall art.

I'm not the PP you responded to, BTW

I was referring to "wall art" -- paintings, etc. -- not the photography session. I supposed I wouldn't spend $1,000 on a family photograph, but $1,000 is what you would expect to pay for an emerging artist's work and much cheaper than you would expect a wealthy person to pay for art by established artists.

Oh, well I'm pretty sure the PP you quoted was talking about photographs as wall art, so your reply wasn't relevant to what s/he was saying, then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

smiley525 wrote:I definitely display photos of my kids and my clients that spend $1,000 plus for wall art display their kids too (I'm a photographer). Depends how they are displayed and on what type of material (Canvas, float wrap, etc)

Sorry, I can't help but comment that $1,000 is not much for "wall art." It certainly doesn't show that someone is upper class.

You are the only one who thinks this way. Everyone else who posts on DCUM looking for a custom photographer wants to spend no more than $300 on the whole shebang, not just the wall art.

I'm not the PP you responded to, BTW

I was referring to "wall art" -- paintings, etc. -- not the photography session. I supposed I wouldn't spend $1,000 on a family photograph, but $1,000 is what you would expect to pay for an emerging artist's work and much cheaper than you would expect a wealthy person to pay for art by established artists.

Oh, well I'm pretty sure the PP you quoted was talking about photographs as wall art, so your reply wasn't relevant to what s/he was saying, then.

Well excuuuuuse me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

smiley525 wrote:I definitely display photos of my kids and my clients that spend $1,000 plus for wall art display their kids too (I'm a photographer). Depends how they are displayed and on what type of material (Canvas, float wrap, etc)

Sorry, I can't help but comment that $1,000 is not much for "wall art." It certainly doesn't show that someone is upper class.

You are the only one who thinks this way. Everyone else who posts on DCUM looking for a custom photographer wants to spend no more than $300 on the whole shebang, not just the wall art.

I'm not the PP you responded to, BTW

I was referring to "wall art" -- paintings, etc. -- not the photography session. I supposed I wouldn't spend $1,000 on a family photograph, but $1,000 is what you would expect to pay for an emerging artist's work and much cheaper than you would expect a wealthy person to pay for art by established artists.

Oh, well I'm pretty sure the PP you quoted was talking about photographs as wall art, so your reply wasn't relevant to what s/he was saying, then.

Well excuuuuuse me.

PP above again -- didn't mean that to sound as mean as it appears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Well excuuuuuse me.

I didn't say it to be rude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well excuuuuuse me.

I didn't say it to be rude.

I know, PP. I took it back. I didn't mean to be rude, either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Well excuuuuuse me.

I didn't say it to be rude.

I know, PP. I took it back. I didn't mean to be rude, either.

Let us join hands and be friends on this Saturday night.

[Anonymous]

I fall in the upper class category.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think this also applies to Facebook. I find displaying too many pictures of yourself as really odd and show offy.

Really odd and show offy? Just because someone posts something you don't have to look at it.

Glad you're not my friend!

[Anonymous]

This is a nation of vulgarians. The old money stayed back in the old country.
Hence the huge TVs etc.

But don't worry about it. We sometimes find your brashness quite refreshing.