Krash-Out Patel is Directing Under the Influence

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Why do you wish it was for more money?

I would like him to put The Atlantic out of business.

You know he's going to lose over and over, right? Trump's extracted a couple settlements because the defendants feared his Presidential power. Patel has no such advantage. He's blowing money and drawing more attention to his behavior.

I would like the suit to go forward. Discovery would be interesting.

[Anonymous]

Atlantic will print anything anti-Trump with no fact checking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Get ready, a bit down the road, for Patel to withdraw the suit.

Prediction: he'll try to characterize his abandoning the suit as some kind of selfless act, e.g., he needs to get back to his important FBI cos-play work of 'keeping America safe' and doesn't have time to do battle with the elites at The Atlantic (even though he could have definitely won the lawsuit.) No one will really believe him, but, whatever, he's used to that.

Later, Trump will fire him.

[Anonymous]

Ooo Trump hates drunks. This should be fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Why do you wish it was for more money?

I would like him to put The Atlantic out of business.

You know he's going to lose over and over, right? Trump's extracted a couple settlements because the defendants feared his Presidential power. Patel has no such advantage. He's blowing money and drawing more attention to his behavior.

I would like the suit to go forward. Discovery would be interesting.

Me too. Can't wait for this idiot podcaster to get his comeuppance. Smart money's on Kash dropping the lawsuit when the Atlantic calls his bluff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Why do you wish it was for more money?

I would like him to put The Atlantic out of business.

Ah yes. The party of free speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ooo Trump hates drunks. This should be fun.

Yep, straight from the brilliant strategist, Patel. Keep the story in the news for Trump to see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Discovery should be fun. Does he plan to pay his lawyers?

My guess is the ‘ sources close to the situation’ will not come out of their anonymous state to engage in the lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Discovery should be fun. Does he plan to pay his lawyers?

My guess is the ‘ sources close to the situation’ will not come out of their anonymous state to engage in the lawsuit.

Have you heard the word "subpoena"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has there ever been a more unqualified director in the history of the FBI?

What a ridiculous statement.

In just over a year:

40,000+ violent crime arrests - up 112%
2 wonky eyes - 200% increase over previous FBI directors
2K+ gangs/criminal enterprises disrupted - up 210%
6,300+ child victims located - up 30%
2,500 kilograms of fentanyl seized, enough to kill 180 million Americans - up 31%
8 of the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted fugitives captured - double the number captured the previous four years combined

This is the work the FBI should be doing. And, not listed are all the counterespionage investigations and arrests they have made.
Patel has his priorities straight - unlike former FBI directors.

+ 1 Justice for Kashyap!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Discovery should be fun. Does he plan to pay his lawyers?

My guess is the ‘ sources close to the situation’ will not come out of their anonymous state to engage in the lawsuit.

On no, you're right. I wonder if the Atlantic has lawyers who do this for an actual living? It being a novel case that the media hasn't faced and all...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Has there ever been a more unqualified director in the history of the FBI?

What a ridiculous statement.

In just over a year:

40,000+ violent crime arrests - up 112%
2K+ gangs/criminal enterprises disrupted - up 210%
6,300+ child victims located - up 30%
2,500 kilograms of fentanyl seized, enough to kill 180 million Americans - up 31%
8 of the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted fugitives captured - double the number captured the previous four years combined

This is the work the FBI should be doing. And, not listed are all the counterespionage investigations and arrests they have made.
Patel has his priorities straight - unlike former FBI directors.

Give me a break. He’s binge drinking with a bunch of twenty year olds on national television. What priorities?

And a lot of these “stats” are probably just how he is measuring things. How exactly does “criminal enterprises disrupted” work and how is that different from an arrest? And WHO exactly captured the fugitives? Sounds like taking credit for other people’s work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Discovery should be fun. Does he plan to pay his lawyers?

My guess is the ‘ sources close to the situation’ will not come out of their anonymous state to engage in the lawsuit.

On no, you're right. I wonder if the Atlantic has lawyers who do this for an actual living? It being a novel case that the media hasn't faced and all...

Kash has top-notch lawyers, so no worries with Jesse Binnall on his side: https://www.thedailybeast.com/keystone-kash-hires-lawyer-tied-to-black-nazi-after-boozing-report/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Atlantic will print anything anti-Trump with no fact checking.

I know you wish this were true, but it isn't.

He'll drop the lawsuit, of course, but it would be fun if he didn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To all of you who said he would not file suit:

Told you so. I only wish it were for more $$.

Discovery should be fun. Does he plan to pay his lawyers?

My guess is the ‘ sources close to the situation’ will not come out of their anonymous state to engage in the lawsuit.

Gosh, it's going to be hard to crack then.