Pam Bondi's "testimony" is reading off-topic insults as prompted by her handlers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

I disagree and don't think she is being blackmailed. Karoline is a pitbull and a believer. Bondi is just a little smarter and more aware of how she looks when she performs for her audience of one. Karoline knows some people hate her and she hates you twice as much for it. Bondi is aware that this era will end, that she has turned her family name into mud, and that she may never have a regular job again. It doesn't stop her, but she shows that she is aware.

Disagree. She will have a job with a rabid MAGA think tank. And she doesn't care what non MAGA think of her or her family.

You guys really do not understand the MAGA cult mindset. Do you think cult members care what you think of them? No, they see you has someone who is ignorant and doesn't understand.

Sorry, whaaaaaaa? Do you honestly believe Pam Bondi is capable of THINKING??????????

Do you honestly believe MAGA care?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think this is how a lawyer should act. When she talked about the Dow, I thought she was crashing out.

The Epstein files are probably stressing her the hell out.

I do not know much about her or her background or whether she has any empathy. If she does have empathy or shreds of humanity left, perhaps the rapes of 9 year olds and such is getting to her. Perhaps not.

She is definitely a woman who has been awarded power by men, so she is in a precarious place.

I read an article about her upbringing and people who grew up with her apparently have no idea how she became this person. Sounds like she used to be VERY different before meeting Trump. I think her nickname back then was Pambi.

cults have a way with changing your personality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think this is how a lawyer should act. When she talked about the Dow, I thought she was crashing out.

The Epstein files are probably stressing her the hell out.

I do not know much about her or her background or whether she has any empathy. If she does have empathy or shreds of humanity left, perhaps the rapes of 9 year olds and such is getting to her. Perhaps not.

She is definitely a woman who has been awarded power by men, so she is in a precarious place.

I don’t think she has empathy for the victims, I think she is scared for herself. If this continues to blow up they are going to throw her under the bus.

Maybe she forgot that Nixon's attorney general went to jail for nearly 2 years. She'll be in much much longer, since this coverup is a million x worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

I disagree and don't think she is being blackmailed. Karoline is a pitbull and a believer. Bondi is just a little smarter and more aware of how she looks when she performs for her audience of one. Karoline knows some people hate her and she hates you twice as much for it. Bondi is aware that this era will end, that she has turned her family name into mud, and that she may never have a regular job again. It doesn't stop her, but she shows that she is aware.

Disagree. She will have a job with a rabid MAGA think tank. And she doesn't care what non MAGA think of her or her family.

The rate this is going, there will be no MAGA think tank because it's all a house of cards and collapsing fast.

There are right wig think tanks, but they have no use for an charismatic loser like Bondi unless she has proximity to power they can manipulate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This performance was scary in its utter disregard for any of the norms of an appearance before a Congressional committee.

You only behave like this ridiculous excuse for an Attorney General (and for a woman) behaved unless you are ready to participate in a dictatorship and believe you will either be part of the ruling junta or go down trying. Otherwise she is looking at a trial and a long prison sentence in the future.

Praying to all the Gods. Her and Noem and Hegseth. Miller is too clever by half and even though he's the mastermind behind most of the cruelty, he's been careful not to be in a position of responsibility at any department. He gets a special place in hell.

Being a bad leader isn't a crime. What crime have the secretaries and attorney's committed that Miller has not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

You spelled Republican wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No wonder she is twice divorced and a third marriage was cancelled the day it was scheduled (lucky guy). She likes being a shrew.

There's plenty to take issue with regarding her job performance. This kind of rhetoric hurts women in general. Please don't.

I don't know. The problem with her right now is that she 100% played to the rhetoric and stereotype; it was a bad look. The kind of thing that gets you to question her legitimacy. Does she deserve her job title? How did she get there? What sort of DEI did she benefit from? How many lap dances did she perform to get where she is? Did she earn her chops? What is wrong with women in the Republican Party? Who, or what men, are deciding that these women need to be let through the gate? Is it an extension of their pattern of picking illegitimate presidential candidates, defaulting to candidates who can be easily manipulated by the back-office-in-charge boys?

Everyone lauded her as being a good pick. But was she? Or has her entire career been stage-managed? Was she propped up by a team of talented back-office boys and girls who did the actual work. Talented and intelligent folks of questionable character who didn't have the right look, boot-licking ability, or lap-dancing abilities to be the figurehead?

I watched not just the sound clips but the actual live hearing, and it was the most bizarre thing I've ever seen in real life. How could a reportedly seasoned, intelligent, powerful, and accomplished woman conduct herself that way? She came across as weak, pathetic, criminally dishonest, an attack dog, and a mean girl who was way out of her depth.

And for what, a decrepit old rich guy, and his perverse buddies? Power? I didn't see power yesterday. Power adjacent, perhaps. Desperately, power hungry, definitely. I mean, she's 60; a 60-year-old woman can be a powerful force precisely because, at least I want to believe. Because if she's still relevant, it's because she had the brains, talent, and guts to stick it out. A relevant and powerful woman at 60 will have sacrificed and fought harder than anyone to get to where she is and to stay there, not by lying on her back with legs akimbo, but by grit, force, brains, grace, and talent. But maybe I didn't factor in the women who they let through because they can be controlled and are useful.

What I saw was a woman screaming and preening for the camera. Digging through her 5-inch white slam/burn binders, refusing to make eye contact with sex abuse victims, and democratic and critical republican lawmakers.

Unlike an older woman with power, she sat there like a 20-year-old, an old man's darling. Preening and stroking her hair, and cheerleading for Trump, a convicted criminal and sex offender, who, even at 60, and long past sex object age, brought to the table nothing of value other than her ability to pretzel herself for powerful bad men. A has been a sex object, batting vacant, over botoxed eyes, opening her mouth in two modes only, fawning for likes, or spewing vitriolic stupidity, both modes managing to master smallness and weakness in total subservience to men in power. For what? Literally defending and ducking and dodging for billionaires who rape kids, and a powerful executive branch that abuses and terrorizes people without power. With her silly slam/burn books and all.

Things that stood out for me, her beaming and triumphantly looking around the room after Congresswoman Balint left; she literally was searching the room like a newly house-trained mutt, waiting to be patted on the head for taking its first sh**t outside. Yuck, gross. Who is this woman?

How the men treated her: Rep. Garcia almost made her cry. Rankin told her, with authority, to shut her mouth, over and over again, and she responded by consulting her slam book, shrewishly and shrilly. A roomful of Reps laughed at her when she interjected, "But what about the Dow, it hit 50,000 dollars?" her looking generally miffed, stomping her foot with the demeanor and logic of a 6-year-old, " Stop laughing at me! Wah, wha!!! And all the men in the room managed to do it without looking like brutes because she was that awful.

Whether she truly is out of her depth, or if she's faking subservience for power, does it matter? What I saw yesterday was a 60-year-old woman who acted like a petty, silly, stupid, shrill, mean girl, who sacrificed her character, dignity, and self on an altar built by and for the benefit of the patriarchy of the most rich and powerful. Those least in need of protection.

She is doing a disservice to all women; she has power, given through the stroke of a pen, what luck, and she is throwing it away for what? Yesterday, she managed to be a monkey shining, 3-ring circus, of one. On its surface, it was highly amusing to watch, wow, look at her go... but it was also painful. What chance do women have when she represents what power for a woman looks like? Who let this buffoon through the gates?

Don't forget she is the attorney general of the US, and she's proved herself, but yesterday, to be no more than a silly little plaything, performing stupid tricks for powerful men. Call her out and condemn her for what she is. A small woman who flew too close to the sun with predictable results. A cautionary tale. Don't be like Pam!

It was definitely the bolded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just don’t understand how evangelicals and other religious people can support Trump and his administration. How do they handle the severe cognitive dissonance?

Finally learning what religion is, eh?

[Anonymous]

Cheers to the PP who saw a powerful evil woman screaming at men who are trying to get justice for rape victims, and decided that it's proof that that men are the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

I disagree and don't think she is being blackmailed. Karoline is a pitbull and a believer. Bondi is just a little smarter and more aware of how she looks when she performs for her audience of one. Karoline knows some people hate her and she hates you twice as much for it. Bondi is aware that this era will end, that she has turned her family name into mud, and that she may never have a regular job again. It doesn't stop her, but she shows that she is aware.

Disagree. She will have a job with a rabid MAGA think tank. And she doesn't care what non MAGA think of her or her family.

The rate this is going, there will be no MAGA think tank because it's all a house of cards and collapsing fast.

Not fast enough!

[Anonymous]

"Everyone lauded her as being a good pick."

To PP who posted this: where are you getting this? The vote on her was 54-46.

Bondi was characterized as a loyal ally to Trump, having served on his first impeachment defense team and supported 2020 election fraud claims. No one thought she was a good pick, just that she wasn't as bad as Gaetz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No wonder she is twice divorced and a third marriage was cancelled the day it was scheduled (lucky guy). She likes being a shrew.

There's plenty to take issue with regarding her job performance. This kind of rhetoric hurts women in general. Please don't.

I don't know. The problem with her right now is that she 100% played to the rhetoric and stereotype; it was a bad look. The kind of thing that gets you to question her legitimacy. Does she deserve her job title? How did she get there? What sort of DEI did she benefit from? How many lap dances did she perform to get where she is? Did she earn her chops? What is wrong with women in the Republican Party? Who, or what men, are deciding that these women need to be let through the gate? Is it an extension of their pattern of picking illegitimate presidential candidates, defaulting to candidates who can be easily manipulated by the back-office-in-charge boys?

Everyone lauded her as being a good pick. But was she? Or has her entire career been stage-managed? Was she propped up by a team of talented back-office boys and girls who did the actual work. Talented and intelligent folks of questionable character who didn't have the right look, boot-licking ability, or lap-dancing abilities to be the figurehead?

I watched not just the sound clips but the actual live hearing, and it was the most bizarre thing I've ever seen in real life. How could a reportedly seasoned, intelligent, powerful, and accomplished woman conduct herself that way? She came across as weak, pathetic, criminally dishonest, an attack dog, and a mean girl who was way out of her depth.

And for what, a decrepit old rich guy, and his perverse buddies? Power? I didn't see power yesterday. Power adjacent, perhaps. Desperately, power hungry, definitely. I mean, she's 60; a 60-year-old woman can be a powerful force precisely because, at least I want to believe. Because if she's still relevant, it's because she had the brains, talent, and guts to stick it out. A relevant and powerful woman at 60 will have sacrificed and fought harder than anyone to get to where she is and to stay there, not by lying on her back with legs akimbo, but by grit, force, brains, grace, and talent. But maybe I didn't factor in the women who they let through because they can be controlled and are useful.

What I saw was a woman screaming and preening for the camera. Digging through her 5-inch white slam/burn binders, refusing to make eye contact with sex abuse victims, and democratic and critical republican lawmakers.

Unlike an older woman with power, she sat there like a 20-year-old, an old man's darling. Preening and stroking her hair, and cheerleading for Trump, a convicted criminal and sex offender, who, even at 60, and long past sex object age, brought to the table nothing of value other than her ability to pretzel herself for powerful bad men. A has been a sex object, batting vacant, over botoxed eyes, opening her mouth in two modes only, fawning for likes, or spewing vitriolic stupidity, both modes managing to master smallness and weakness in total subservience to men in power. For what? Literally defending and ducking and dodging for billionaires who rape kids, and a powerful executive branch that abuses and terrorizes people without power. With her silly slam/burn books and all.

Things that stood out for me, her beaming and triumphantly looking around the room after Congresswoman Balint left; she literally was searching the room like a newly house-trained mutt, waiting to be patted on the head for taking its first sh**t outside. Yuck, gross. Who is this woman?

How the men treated her: Rep. Garcia almost made her cry. Rankin told her, with authority, to shut her mouth, over and over again, and she responded by consulting her slam book, shrewishly and shrilly. A roomful of Reps laughed at her when she interjected, "But what about the Dow, it hit 50,000 dollars?" her looking generally miffed, stomping her foot with the demeanor and logic of a 6-year-old, " Stop laughing at me! Wah, wha!!! And all the men in the room managed to do it without looking like brutes because she was that awful.

Whether she truly is out of her depth, or if she's faking subservience for power, does it matter? What I saw yesterday was a 60-year-old woman who acted like a petty, silly, stupid, shrill, mean girl, who sacrificed her character, dignity, and self on an altar built by and for the benefit of the patriarchy of the most rich and powerful. Those least in need of protection.

She is doing a disservice to all women; she has power, given through the stroke of a pen, what luck, and she is throwing it away for what? Yesterday, she managed to be a monkey shining, 3-ring circus, of one. On its surface, it was highly amusing to watch, wow, look at her go... but it was also painful. What chance do women have when she represents what power for a woman looks like? Who let this buffoon through the gates?

Don't forget she is the attorney general of the US, and she's proved herself, but yesterday, to be no more than a silly little plaything, performing stupid tricks for powerful men. Call her out and condemn her for what she is. A small woman who flew too close to the sun with predictable results. A cautionary tale. Don't be like Pam!

Plus 50 Trillion in agreement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

I disagree and don't think she is being blackmailed. Karoline is a pitbull and a believer. Bondi is just a little smarter and more aware of how she looks when she performs for her audience of one. Karoline knows some people hate her and she hates you twice as much for it. Bondi is aware that this era will end, that she has turned her family name into mud, and that she may never have a regular job again. It doesn't stop her, but she shows that she is aware.

Disagree. She will have a job with a rabid MAGA think tank. And she doesn't care what non MAGA think of her or her family.

You guys really do not understand the MAGA cult mindset. Do you think cult members care what you think of them? No, they see you has someone who is ignorant and doesn't understand.

Sorry, whaaaaaaa? Do you honestly believe Pam Bondi is capable of THINKING??????????

She will go back to Murdoch's Fox Entertainment News channel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Everyone lauded her as being a good pick."

To PP who posted this: where are you getting this? The vote on her was 54-46.

Bondi was characterized as a loyal ally to Trump, having served on his first impeachment defense team and supported 2020 election fraud claims. No one thought she was a good pick, just that she wasn't as bad as Gaetz.

Not the poster who said she was lauded as a good pick, but she was lauded as a good and safe pick after the Matt Gaetz debacle. So she was considered safe enough after Gaetz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
All I can think about is how Pam Bondi is like the people who come to DCUM to ask for cool comebacks that their kid can say to other kids at school.

https://newrepublic.com/post/206469/pam-bondi-burn-book-notes-democrats

Instead of answering questions asked by Congress, Pam Bondi at the hearing is yelling off-topic insults that her handlers whisper in hear to tell her to say, because she can't even remember them herself.

Why is the "head" of the DOJ a puppet?

We knew this was going to happen after J6. The first time dump was president he had true patriotic Americans and old school republicans who told him know and stood up for the constitution. After we saw him plan and execute J6 everyone should have known that if he got back in the WH he would pick yes men and women to finish his mission.Him and his handlers were going to make sure that America was destroyed and good people would not stand in their way. She is all part of the plan.....the plan to destroy America from the inside out with blatant lies, coverups and corruption. no one should be shocked.