Pam Bondi's "testimony" is reading off-topic insults as prompted by her handlers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

You read my mind. Especially when she was repeatedly what a great President Trump is over and over. It was like she was trying to justify her behavior to herself. Like she'd been abused.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No wonder she is twice divorced and a third marriage was cancelled the day it was scheduled (lucky guy). She likes being a shrew.

Theres plenty to take issue with regard to her job performance. This kind of rhetoric hurts women in general. Please don't.

DP Like it or not, it is the world in which we live. When she was nominated as AG, women were excited because Trump picked a woman for the position. Her credentials and background (Trump school bribes) were disregarded simply because she was female. With her nasty fake blonde hair, awful accent, shrill voice, and over extended plastic face she unfortunately will always be used as a means to denigrate women. It is too bad, but it is real.

Who are these women who were excited about Trump hiring a woman? Loretta Lynch, who has a Harvard law degree was US Attorney General under Obama. Janet Reno, another Harvard educated lawyer served under Clinton.

Why would anyone think that Bondi, with her third rate law education in an unknown Florida school would be a step up. Trump filled the top positions with white trash with shitty backgrounds that promised to do what was best for him, not what’s best for the country.

Conservatives think elite schools don’t matter.

Nonsense. It’s objectively true that elite schools do not matter at all. Vance? Hegseth? Trump and Jr went to Wharton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

You read my mind. Especially when she was repeatedly what a great President Trump is over and over. It was like she was trying to justify her behavior to herself. Like she'd been abused.

BONDI IS NOT A VICTIM!!! She is a craven ladder climber who doesn’t care about the abuse. Just like Acosta was and all of the ladder climbers who allowed Epstein to act with impunity. Ladder climbers under 4 Presidents, men like Larry Summers who fail up.

Stop thinking these people are being blackmailed/coerced. They are WILLING accomplices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

You read my mind. Especially when she was repeatedly what a great President Trump is over and over. It was like she was trying to justify her behavior to herself. Like she'd been abused.

BONDI IS NOT A VICTIM!!! She is a craven ladder climber who doesn’t care about the abuse. Just like Acosta was and all of the ladder climbers who allowed Epstein to act with impunity. Ladder climbers under 4 Presidents, men like Larry Summers who fail up.

Stop thinking these people are being blackmailed/coerced. They are WILLING accomplices.

She should be reminded that she's going to take the fall for it if she keeps playing this game.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about her…

These will be Trump's words when he eventually turns his back and leaves her to the wolves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know nothing about her…

These will be Trump's words when he eventually turns his back and leaves her to the wolves.

LOL. Exactly. Why do people fall on their swords for these grifters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is time to seriously investigate this woman. That testimony made it crystal clear to me that she is being blackmailed, just like all the others in this administration. What’s different about her is that she fits the description of the girls these pedos targeted. Their MO was assaulting children and then forcing those children to assault others on camera so that they are trapped. I am certainly not defending her or making excuses for her. But I will say that she looked tortured. Have we truly ruled out the possibility of her being a part of this ring in one way or another? Either as a perp or initially a victim? Comparing her to Karoline - there is a difference. Karoline seems to love her job, thinks she is killing it, and wants to be there. She thinks she is forging a path to an ambitious political career and wants to be doing and saying what she does. But with Bondi, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Something is off with her.

You read my mind. Especially when she was repeatedly what a great President Trump is over and over. It was like she was trying to justify her behavior to herself. Like she'd been abused.

BONDI IS NOT A VICTIM!!! She is a craven ladder climber who doesn’t care about the abuse. Just like Acosta was and all of the ladder climbers who allowed Epstein to act with impunity. Ladder climbers under 4 Presidents, men like Larry Summers who fail up.

Stop thinking these people are being blackmailed/coerced. They are WILLING accomplices.

+100

She’s a not very smart woman who went to a garbage law school. In any other presidency she would have no chance at her current position. She made a choice for personal gain plus her old ass was not a victim. And even if she were she’s still responsible for her own wrongs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think this is how a lawyer should act. When she talked about the Dow, I thought she was crashing out.

The Epstein files are probably stressing her the hell out.

I do not know much about her or her background or whether she has any empathy. If she does have empathy or shreds of humanity left, perhaps the rapes of 9 year olds and such is getting to her. Perhaps not.

She is definitely a woman who has been awarded power by men, so she is in a precarious place.

I read an article about her upbringing and people who grew up with her apparently have no idea how she became this person. Sounds like she used to be VERY different before meeting Trump. I think her nickname back then was Pambi.

Who is she? I have been wondering why she is so mean and hateful, and willing to do anything for trump. I no nothing g about her. Can you link the article or cite where you read?!

The Atlantic has an article where people who knew her before describe her as being deeply insecure and as a person who desperately wanted to be liked.

She’s described as having been very, very average and no one expected her to amount to much.

She comes for a family of democrats, and was said to have had liberal views but jumped on the MAGA train when she realized it might help her to finally become something.

Isn't her brother also a big local Republican who ran to lead Washington's attorney bar association? I am not saying he is anything like his sister just that I thought he was also a Republican.

Previously worked with him and he is dumb and unlikable like his sister and he is also a shameless self-promoter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

Absolutely...and yet they aren't responsible for the biggest coverup in this nation's history. Bill Clinton has said that he will testify publicly, but the Trump administration doesn't want that.

If you don't think GOP aren't pro-pedophilia, you're not paying attention. Why is it that not a single GOP congressperson asked Bondi a question about the Epstein case in the Epstein case hearing????? Because they DO NOT CARE about this massive pedophilia ring. They like the system, and don't want it to crumble. Many Dems are willing to do just that.

Stop both sides-ing this!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

Absolutely...and yet they aren't responsible for the biggest coverup in this nation's history. Bill Clinton has said that he will testify publicly, but the Trump administration doesn't want that.

If you don't think GOP aren't pro-pedophilia, you're not paying attention. Why is it that not a single GOP congressperson asked Bondi a question about the Epstein case in the Epstein case hearing????? Because they DO NOT CARE about this massive pedophilia ring. They like the system, and don't want it to crumble. Many Dems are willing to do just that.

Stop both sides-ing this!

Please, none of them gave 2 craps about the victims. It's just their ticket to "nail" Trump. Were they that passionate for the victims under Garland?

Bill Clinton only plans to testify because he's caught. Same with Summers. They all want to hide until they can no longer.

Maybe, you should stop seeing this as a Republican/Dems thing but as a what can powerful men get away with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

Absolutely...and yet they aren't responsible for the biggest coverup in this nation's history. Bill Clinton has said that he will testify publicly, but the Trump administration doesn't want that.

If you don't think GOP aren't pro-pedophilia, you're not paying attention. Why is it that not a single GOP congressperson asked Bondi a question about the Epstein case in the Epstein case hearing????? Because they DO NOT CARE about this massive pedophilia ring. They like the system, and don't want it to crumble. Many Dems are willing to do just that.

Stop both sides-ing this!

Please, none of them gave 2 craps about the victims. It's just their ticket to "nail" Trump. Were they that passionate for the victims under Garland?

Bill Clinton only plans to testify because he's caught. Same with Summers. They all want to hide until they can no longer.

Maybe, you should stop seeing this as a Republican/Dems thing but as a what can powerful men get away with.

dp.. currently, only one side is refusing to investigate the Epstein files in more depth, and it's not the Dems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

Absolutely...and yet they aren't responsible for the biggest coverup in this nation's history. Bill Clinton has said that he will testify publicly, but the Trump administration doesn't want that.

If you don't think GOP aren't pro-pedophilia, you're not paying attention. Why is it that not a single GOP congressperson asked Bondi a question about the Epstein case in the Epstein case hearing????? Because they DO NOT CARE about this massive pedophilia ring. They like the system, and don't want it to crumble. Many Dems are willing to do just that.

Stop both sides-ing this!

Please, none of them gave 2 craps about the victims. It's just their ticket to "nail" Trump. Were they that passionate for the victims under Garland?

Bill Clinton only plans to testify because he's caught. Same with Summers. They all want to hide until they can no longer.

Maybe, you should stop seeing this as a Republican/Dems thing but as a what can powerful men get away with.

dp.. currently, only one side is refusing to investigate the Epstein files in more depth, and it's not the Dems.

How many files did Biden release? Why didn't Raskin ask for them then? He made a big deal to Bondi that he had demanded the files prior to 2020. Why didn't he deman them 2021-2024?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

Absolutely...and yet they aren't responsible for the biggest coverup in this nation's history. Bill Clinton has said that he will testify publicly, but the Trump administration doesn't want that.

If you don't think GOP aren't pro-pedophilia, you're not paying attention. Why is it that not a single GOP congressperson asked Bondi a question about the Epstein case in the Epstein case hearing????? Because they DO NOT CARE about this massive pedophilia ring. They like the system, and don't want it to crumble. Many Dems are willing to do just that.

Stop both sides-ing this!

Please, none of them gave 2 craps about the victims. It's just their ticket to "nail" Trump. Were they that passionate for the victims under Garland?

Bill Clinton only plans to testify because he's caught. Same with Summers. They all want to hide until they can no longer.

Maybe, you should stop seeing this as a Republican/Dems thing but as a what can powerful men get away with.

dp.. currently, only one side is refusing to investigate the Epstein files in more depth, and it's not the Dems.

How many files did Biden release? Why didn't Raskin ask for them then? He made a big deal to Bondi that he had demanded the files prior to 2020. Why didn't he deman them 2021-2024?

It’s 2026 now. Your god king is in charge. Why isn’t he investigating?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eh. It's all theater. The questions were loaded and Congressmen and women, on both sides, were grandstanding. These people haven't been doing their jobs for years.

Stop both sidesing everything! Just stop. The people challenging her on the Esptein files were not "grandstanding." They were doing exactly what their job requires of them.

Exactly. Apparently the GOP asked her about the stock market and immigration during the Epstein hearing.

That tells you everything you need to know — they don’t care one iota for actual justice.

Pam Bondi literally gave the tip line number in front of women who said they couldn’t get anyone in the FBI or DOJ to talk to them.

Apparently pedophilia is now political.

If you vote GOP/MAGA you are pro-pedophilia.

I’ve been saying this forever. You cannot trust maga people in positions and professions that provide them access to children. They’ve proven again and again that AT BEST they are ambivalent about child abuse.

And you would trust the likes of Bill Clinton and Larry Summers? lol. Obviously, there are men of power on both sides that are depraved.

Absolutely...and yet they aren't responsible for the biggest coverup in this nation's history. Bill Clinton has said that he will testify publicly, but the Trump administration doesn't want that.

If you don't think GOP aren't pro-pedophilia, you're not paying attention. Why is it that not a single GOP congressperson asked Bondi a question about the Epstein case in the Epstein case hearing????? Because they DO NOT CARE about this massive pedophilia ring. They like the system, and don't want it to crumble. Many Dems are willing to do just that.

Stop both sides-ing this!

Please, none of them gave 2 craps about the victims. It's just their ticket to "nail" Trump. Were they that passionate for the victims under Garland?

Bill Clinton only plans to testify because he's caught. Same with Summers. They all want to hide until they can no longer.

Maybe, you should stop seeing this as a Republican/Dems thing but as a what can powerful men get away with.

dp.. currently, only one side is refusing to investigate the Epstein files in more depth, and it's not the Dems.

How many files did Biden release? Why didn't Raskin ask for them then? He made a big deal to Bondi that he had demanded the files prior to 2020. Why didn't he deman them 2021-2024?

JFC for the ten thousandth time, Biden didn’t run on releasing the files. And the DOJ under Biden was using that information to prosecute Ghislaine Maxwell so it wasn’t available to be released until her conviction, and then she appealed.