It isn't a "just trust me approach". The Dems have no leaders to provide us with anything and in this case, no leaders is better than having someone like Biden attempting to be a leader. The Dems are in an advantageous position because of the extremely weak and unpopular GOP POTUS and for now, that's OK. When Dems nominate their next by default leader in 2028, the strength of that leader will very much so matter because the last thing we want is for another weak Dem leader to fumble our momentum back to the GOP. Until then, there is no need to panic while we sit back and watch Trump gift the Dem Congressional seats in the mid-terms. |
NP. The ugly issue we have is this: the DNC is seeing internal polling indicating just how unpopular the Biden-era immigration positions really were. And, the people pushing those positions are still in leadership in the DNC. This is a tough and nuanced issue. ICE itself employs a large number of working class Latinos. People don’t like police executions but they also do not like feeling that they are paying high taxes for benefits that illegal immigrants get while they don’t get those benefits. I’m in blue California and the undercurrent of anger about the health care and housing benefits that undocumented people get versus what is available to working and middle class people is palpable. Right now the DNC is running almost entirely on “Trump bad.” And yes of course that is true, he is as awful and horrific as possible (I mean the fact that nothing was surprising about him out of yesterday’s Epstein release should tell us how awful he is). But “Trump bad” doesn’t substitute for leadership. To be clear, I am extremely opposed to what ICE does and how it operates. It is wrong across the board. But I also think DCUM posters in general do not realize just how out of step they are with the rest of the country, probably because DCUM posters are very insulated in general from the impact of the DNC immigration positions. |
Well said. |
Who cares what the DNC or RNC leadership thinks, says or does??? They don't speak for the American people. They speak first and foremost for ultra wealthy entities that donate most of the billions of dollars they piss away each election cycle. The America people have to rise up and take power back from the corrupt RNC and DNC. Ignore them and put your support behind a people's candidate in 2028. |
2026 and 2028 are slam dunks for Dems. If Dems lose 2028, they are truly lost. On one hand it would leave us with the awfulness of the MAGA. On the other, it may finally get us a Democratic Party replacement that we sorely need. If the Dems.take 2032/2036, then they can claim a victory. Hopefully, this results in a GOP collapse that allows for a better replacement but I’m not sure. (Yes, I want to replace both major parties, preferably GOP/MAGA first.) The real litmus test for the Dems is 2032/2036 not 2028. Of course by then we may really need to gird our loins because both current major parties want to be the only major party. |
Will there be a viable replacement for one of the current major parties for 2028? |
That’s not happening. Get your head out of the clouds. |
For now were left with one or the other side of the uniparty. The current major political corporations (DNC and RNC) need each other. Their acolytes will have you believing they can never be replaced. Two party system doesn’t mean the system must include the two we have now. |
+1000 They are private entities that should be allowed to fail when failing and the Trump era in politics is undeniable evidence of two failed entities running our political system and Federal Government. This being said; progressives and conservatives aligning behind different parties after being ruled by the same two entities for 150 years will or would be a complex transition. |
| It sounds really crazy but what if Barack runs again in 2028? If Trump does, he can right? He was also tough on immigration -Trumps trademark. |
Tell me you’re a coastal UMC lady without telling me you’re a coastal UMC lady. STFU with this |
Agree. I will not vote for another establishment Dem again. If that means we lose, we lose. |
| The chosen candidate needs to be pragmatic, articulate, moderate, relatable, and selected for those qualities, not for belonging to a specific race, ethnicity, or gender. The candidate needs to be clear that s/he is not interested in advocating for fringe social or economic/tax positions. Losing fringe voters is far preferable to losing altogether. |
We have these things called "term limits". Trump and Obama aren't eligible to run for a third term. Find a brain and read something. |
The majority of people will support the people's candidate and therefore they won't "lose". |