Are the private schools ranked 30-70...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory games it by taking a huge percentage ED and then the whole community college thing. Just odd.

Games what? Tufts has a 42% ED acceptance rate. That includes both ED1 and 2.

Actually it's way higher than that. Tufts hasn't reported in several years and there's definitely a reason why. It's not that selective at all in ED becuase it's not many people's first choice. That said, I'd attend there over Tulane or Wake anyday. Think I'd pick BC over Tufts, however.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory games it by taking a huge percentage ED and then the whole community college thing. Just odd.

Games what? Tufts has a 42% ED acceptance rate. That includes both ED1 and 2.

Actually it's way higher than that. Tufts hasn't reported in several years and there's definitely a reason why. It's not that selective at all in ED becuase it's not many people's first choice. That said, I'd attend there over Tulane or Wake anyday. Think I'd pick BC over Tufts, however.

No one cares, work out your issues elsewhere.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Further, why do you care? There is something wrong with adults who spend significant time here railing against various colleges. Get a life.

This

Some people never grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory games it by taking a huge percentage ED and then the whole community college thing. Just odd.

Games what? Tufts has a 42% ED acceptance rate. That includes both ED1 and 2.

Actually it's way higher than that. Tufts hasn't reported in several years and there's definitely a reason why. It's not that selective at all in ED becuase it's not many people's first choice. That said, I'd attend there over Tulane or Wake anyday. Think I'd pick BC over Tufts, however.

So to get this straight, everyone applies ED because it's so hard to get in RD. Tufts gooses their numbers by using ED extensively. Tufts is not a popular first choice, though.

I guess I don't follow the logic. (Alabama-bound?)

[Anonymous]

Full pay family not applying to schools ranked 40-70 like BC and Wake. Wake used to be a lot higher but US News changed methodology. BC has been stuck in high 30s-40s for decade, they aren’t moving up. Tufts used too be ranked much higher. Private schools that are middle of the road. Watch out for SMU, same profile but Dallas has better weather.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Emory games it by taking a huge percentage ED and then the whole community college thing. Just odd.

Games what? Tufts has a 42% ED acceptance rate. That includes both ED1 and 2.

who cares. two undesirable schools.

Undesirable with almost 40k in applications? Emory makes ABC nightly news with common announcements to financial aid. Only elite schools are capable of that.

it’s a back up to a backup. overall yield is an absurd 38% even with ed and oxford campus gaming of stats. Really pathetic

[Anonymous]

These 4 schools are indeed backups to a backup. Wow my kid goes to a 40th ranked school at $95k a year. Not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Full pay family not applying to schools ranked 40-70 like BC and Wake. Wake used to be a lot higher but US News changed methodology. BC has been stuck in high 30s-40s for decade, they aren’t moving up. Tufts used too be ranked much higher. Private schools that are middle of the road. Watch out for SMU, same profile but Dallas has better weather.

So, other than Ivies/T10s, what schools do you consider worth your money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Full pay family not applying to schools ranked 40-70 like BC and Wake. Wake used to be a lot higher but US News changed methodology. BC has been stuck in high 30s-40s for decade, they aren’t moving up. Tufts used too be ranked much higher. Private schools that are middle of the road. Watch out for SMU, same profile but Dallas has better weather.

So, other than Ivies/T10s, what schools do you consider worth your money?

Don’t feed the troll. Who cares what they value?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake, BC, and Tulane just won’t impress potential employers or carry much prestige in social circles. They just don’t.

BC is ranked top 10 in finance and investment banking majors in the country.

Tulane and Wake alums I know also are all very successful and have connections.

Impress potential employers or carry prestige socially ...

Every job interview I went to in my 20s and most people I met that heard that I was a Wake alum all commented on how it's a really good school and I must be really smart. It's not MIT, but I wasn't planning a tech career. When I was there, at least 1/3 of the entering freshman came in pre-med.

Which employers and social circles is that poster even referring to?

the trolling on here is embarassing. most have not heard of wake let alone think it is a great school.

It was/is well known in DC. I don’t care if someone in OK knows where it is as I wasn’t applying for jobs there.

It depends on your field how much weight people put on such things. Pretty sure it at least got me in the door in the late 90s/early 2000s.

Any good hiring manager knows at least the top100 schools if not more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Full pay family not applying to schools ranked 40-70 like BC and Wake. Wake used to be a lot higher but US News changed methodology. BC has been stuck in high 30s-40s for decade, they aren’t moving up. Tufts used too be ranked much higher. Private schools that are middle of the road. Watch out for SMU, same profile but Dallas has better weather.

great.
was there a question here?

[Anonymous]

Lots of better options Vandy, ND, Georgetown, Emory, USC, 20 SLACs, and a dozen state flagships are some. Loads of full pay families opting out of Wake/BC overpriced for likes of Ohio State, UGa, UFlorida, Wisconsin. No discernible difference in job outcomes at a big price difference from BC and Wake. Certainly better sports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Full pay family not applying to schools ranked 40-70 like BC and Wake. Wake used to be a lot higher but US News changed methodology. BC has been stuck in high 30s-40s for decade, they aren’t moving up. Tufts used too be ranked much higher. Private schools that are middle of the road. Watch out for SMU, same profile but Dallas has better weather.

Tornadoes, ice storms, high winds, thunderstorms, high late spring and summer temperatures and humidity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wake, BC, and Tulane just won’t impress potential employers or carry much prestige in social circles. They just don’t.

BC is ranked top 10 in finance and investment banking majors in the country.

Tulane and Wake alums I know also are all very successful and have connections.

I have no idea about prestige in social circles (who cares), but my Tulane DC got a ton of interviews for summer internships while in school based solely on the name of school and alum connections. It has a really good reputation in NYC finance/marketing/PR. So I think you have no idea what you are talking about. Graduated within the last 2 years and currently working in NYC post-grad with so many other Tulane kids. Employers do like Tulane grads. Generally, they are smart and socially adept.

First I agree that these are all good schools. Second, i think most disagreement comes from the changes with time. 20 years ago, Tulane was among top universities but the ranking declined now. Similarly, WashU and Emory used to be in top 10 in 1990 and now after 20th. The opposite examples are USC and Northeastern. 20-30 years ago, there was no way to put them along with elite schools, but now you see how hard to get in. Things are changing except for HYPM. So for school out of HYPM, it’s more important to see what you want and what it offers instead of comparing prestige.

Both were T10 for only 1 year. And I wouldn’t think thats an appropriate ranking for either of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Full pay family not applying to schools ranked 40-70 like BC and Wake. Wake used to be a lot higher but US News changed methodology. BC has been stuck in high 30s-40s for decade, they aren’t moving up. Tufts used too be ranked much higher. Private schools that are middle of the road. Watch out for SMU, same profile but Dallas has better weather.

So, other than Ivies/T10s, what schools do you consider worth your money?

T25, plus USC, NYU Stern, Gatech, Williams, Amherst, UVa McIntire, UT McCombs, Instate public otherwise.