HHS report will link autism to acetaminophen and folate deficiency

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like there is a disconnect between people who are coming here to show how cool they are to dislike this unpopular politician and people who can recognize that having 99% of autism research funded by the same three organizations (one of which is controversial AS). I think RFK is a bad person that has attached himself to legitimate criticisms AND that has identified a few ok points (this not being one of them).

There’s no disconnect. If you cannot perceived that RFK is a brain damaged maniac I don’t know what to say. What kind of autism research was being repressed? Spell it out here, don’t be cute.

Here you go back to him again. Do you actually know anything about autism or the research around it or not? Do you not understand that there is a difference between repressed and not done? Like I have a friend who is involved in research for another rare genetic condition that because qualifies for orphan drug designation (aka more $$ for pharma) has made more progress in the last ten years than autism research has in the last fifty. One thing that rfk’s brainworm has done is the autism data project which has resulted in more proposals than this area has seen in forever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

This. Precisely this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel like there is a disconnect between people who are coming here to show how cool they are to dislike this unpopular politician and people who can recognize that having 99% of autism research funded by the same three organizations (one of which is controversial AS). I think RFK is a bad person that has attached himself to legitimate criticisms AND that has identified a few ok points (this not being one of them).

Exactly. If you want to have a serious conversation about ASD then RFK really is secondary to the parents screaming for more information for decades. There’s one or two people here that think this is political when that’s the farthest thing from reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like there is a disconnect between people who are coming here to show how cool they are to dislike this unpopular politician and people who can recognize that having 99% of autism research funded by the same three organizations (one of which is controversial AS). I think RFK is a bad person that has attached himself to legitimate criticisms AND that has identified a few ok points (this not being one of them).

There’s no disconnect. If you cannot perceived that RFK is a brain damaged maniac I don’t know what to say. What kind of autism research was being repressed? Spell it out here, don’t be cute.

Here you go back to him again. Do you actually know anything about autism or the research around it or not? Do you not understand that there is a difference between repressed and not done? Like I have a friend who is involved in research for another rare genetic condition that because qualifies for orphan drug designation (aka more $$ for pharma) has made more progress in the last ten years than autism research has in the last fifty. One thing that rfk’s brainworm has done is the autism data project which has resulted in more proposals than this area has seen in forever.

Yes. yes I do. Please point me to the autism researchers who are happy about RFK. Also please let me know about the research the prior HHS and all of autism research around the globe was not doing, that RFK (I guess using ChatGPT) will now do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And therefore RFK is good? lol. I mean if that is your level of logic I’m pretty fine with saying you have nothing worth contributing here.

Who said he was good????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And therefore RFK is good? lol. I mean if that is your level of logic I’m pretty fine with saying you have nothing worth contributing here.

You’ve not contributed a single original thought.

What’s your original thought? that RFK using ChatGPT to come up with already refuted ideas about the cause of autism is somehow revolutionary and justifies what Trump did to this country’s research infrastructure? Did you not read the posts about scientists whose data and samples got destroyed?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And therefore RFK is good? lol. I mean if that is your level of logic I’m pretty fine with saying you have nothing worth contributing here.

Who said he was good????

Well you tell us what you think about him. The premise here seems to be that he is going to unlock some heretofore unknown knowledge about autism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like there is a disconnect between people who are coming here to show how cool they are to dislike this unpopular politician and people who can recognize that having 99% of autism research funded by the same three organizations (one of which is controversial AS). I think RFK is a bad person that has attached himself to legitimate criticisms AND that has identified a few ok points (this not being one of them).

Exactly. If you want to have a serious conversation about ASD then RFK really is secondary to the parents screaming for more information for decades. There’s one or two people here that think this is political when that’s the farthest thing from reality.

What does the OP have to do with what you wrote? please explain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And yet people have cited multiple studies that the Tylenol and folate things HAS been studied. So this idea that researchers are only studying one thing is bogus.

And RFK Jr. Has totally and completely devastated scientific research. A friend of mine lost her funding and she was literally studying the impact of inhalation toxins on placental growth. Which, you know, might impact child development? And yet these MAHA types cut their lab because studying placental issues is "DEI".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like there is a disconnect between people who are coming here to show how cool they are to dislike this unpopular politician and people who can recognize that having 99% of autism research funded by the same three organizations (one of which is controversial AS). I think RFK is a bad person that has attached himself to legitimate criticisms AND that has identified a few ok points (this not being one of them).

Exactly. If you want to have a serious conversation about ASD then RFK really is secondary to the parents screaming for more information for decades. There’s one or two people here that think this is political when that’s the farthest thing from reality.

What does the OP have to do with what you wrote? please explain.

I’m done explaining because you clearly aren’t here for an actual conversation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like there is a disconnect between people who are coming here to show how cool they are to dislike this unpopular politician and people who can recognize that having 99% of autism research funded by the same three organizations (one of which is controversial AS). I think RFK is a bad person that has attached himself to legitimate criticisms AND that has identified a few ok points (this not being one of them).

There’s no disconnect. If you cannot perceived that RFK is a brain damaged maniac I don’t know what to say. What kind of autism research was being repressed? Spell it out here, don’t be cute.

Here you go back to him again. Do you actually know anything about autism or the research around it or not? Do you not understand that there is a difference between repressed and not done? Like I have a friend who is involved in research for another rare genetic condition that because qualifies for orphan drug designation (aka more $$ for pharma) has made more progress in the last ten years than autism research has in the last fifty. One thing that rfk’s brainworm has done is the autism data project which has resulted in more proposals than this area has seen in forever.

Yes. yes I do. Please point me to the autism researchers who are happy about RFK. Also please let me know about the research the prior HHS and all of autism research around the globe was not doing, that RFK (I guess using ChatGPT) will now do.

I don’t think you do. I don’t think you have any personal experience with autism and I don’t think you work in STEM. You haven’t mentioned anything factual that isn’t related to RFK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The folate argument reminds me of the argument during Covid that people should take more vitamin D, because people with Covid had less vitamin D in their bodies. I asked a physician friend about this and he explained that it’s because people shed vitamin D when they’re sick. It doesn’t mean that taking more cures your illness.

Right. Similarly when you have autism you have trouble getting enough folate but that doesn't mean taking folate cures autism or even prevents it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And therefore RFK is good? lol. I mean if that is your level of logic I’m pretty fine with saying you have nothing worth contributing here.

Who said he was good????

Well you tell us what you think about him. The premise here seems to be that he is going to unlock some heretofore unknown knowledge about autism.

He is a terrible person and a bad choice. However he seems more open to doing things differently. He himself isn’t going to unlock anything but maybe someone who slightly changed the focus of their research to qualify for an autism related grant might lead to something surprising.

That said this is the choice of the person who a lot of Americans (not me, I voted for Harris) voted for and u don’t get the point of the useless handwriting and the phony concern about autism from people who do not normally think about it at all.

What I wish would really happen but would require an act of Congress a change in the patent system that made it more profitable to develop things besides drugs that treat ED, Covid, and obesity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And therefore RFK is good? lol. I mean if that is your level of logic I’m pretty fine with saying you have nothing worth contributing here.

Who said he was good????

Well you tell us what you think about him. The premise here seems to be that he is going to unlock some heretofore unknown knowledge about autism.

He is a terrible person and a bad choice. However he seems more open to doing things differently. He himself isn’t going to unlock anything but maybe someone who slightly changed the focus of their research to qualify for an autism related grant might lead to something surprising.

That said this is the choice of the person who a lot of Americans (not me, I voted for Harris) voted for and u don’t get the point of the useless handwriting and the phony concern about autism from people who do not normally think about it at all.

What I wish would really happen but would require an act of Congress a change in the patent system that made it more profitable to develop things besides drugs that treat ED, Covid, and obesity.

"Open to doing things differently" meaning devastating research budgets, spreading vaccine misinformation, and faking research with ChatGPT?

Let's also not forget when he whipped up vaccine misinformation in Guam that lead to a measles outbreak that killed 80 people.

And, yes, I have a family member who has a PhD in toxicology and medical research and another one who is a pediatric neurologist. They know what they're talking about when they tell you this guy is dangerous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Folate deficiency is common in autism but its the child who cant absorb it well, not whether it was taken during pregnancy.

There's autism shares a link to digestive disorders, it's known but they don't know if that relationship is causal or shares a common cause. They have, in fact, been investigating this for a while

https://hms.harvard.edu/news/gut-brain-connection-autism

You can't expect fast answers on studying human brain development.

Yes, it would be great if our administration wasn’t actively trying to disrupt medical research, including targeting Harvard and other schools where a lot of great research is being done.
I feel like RFK is the broken clock that is soemthikes occasionally right but because his whole approach is anti-science it is hard to know when that is.

FYI you sound stupid when you call RFK Jr anti-science.

Now you're a parody of yourself. Of course he's anti-science. Have you been living in a hole?

Times are changing. Where we had a handful of people who had to put in many years of school and apprenticeship who had access to medical information and decisions there is now zero barrier to learning. Research that used to take 10+ years can now be modeled in minutes.
Already there is a huge reduction in medical gatekeeping thanks to the disruption of online prescriber.

While the past decades have made incredible leaps in medical care, the old ways are outdated and must and will change.
You.may not like it but younwill have more success going outside and telling the sun not to rise

Oh so you're one of those "My YouTube videos are equivalent to your medical degree" types.

Good lord.

I’d listen to that person before I listen to your “shut down every opinion that doesn’t fit the MSM narrative” types.

I'm so sick of these tropes:
--mainstream media
--big pharma
--expecting medicine to have exact answers.

All someone has to do is say MSM or big pharma and they have credibility with a lot of others. Do you NEVER take meds? Do you live off the grid? Are you a Christian Scientist? Do you only read peer-reviewed journals as you avoid MSM for your info? (Sorry, I'm sure you don't trust those).

The only people I've known who refused meds were Christian Scientists and they died very young when they could have been saved. Is everyone planning to do this to avoid using big pharma? What does it even mean?

I can't believe the nonsense people believe these days.

You can’t get answers if you only follow the same lines of inquiry though. Also big pharma like most large industries has an outsized influence and the revolving door of people from industry to government is not good.

And therefore RFK is good? lol. I mean if that is your level of logic I’m pretty fine with saying you have nothing worth contributing here.

Who said he was good????

Well you tell us what you think about him. The premise here seems to be that he is going to unlock some heretofore unknown knowledge about autism.

He is a terrible person and a bad choice. However he seems more open to doing things differently. He himself isn’t going to unlock anything but maybe someone who slightly changed the focus of their research to qualify for an autism related grant might lead to something surprising.

That said this is the choice of the person who a lot of Americans (not me, I voted for Harris) voted for and u don’t get the point of the useless handwriting and the phony concern about autism from people who do not normally think about it at all.

What I wish would really happen but would require an act of Congress a change in the patent system that made it more profitable to develop things besides drugs that treat ED, Covid, and obesity.

"Open to doing things differently" meaning devastating research budgets, spreading vaccine misinformation, and faking research with ChatGPT?

Let's also not forget when he whipped up vaccine misinformation in Guam that lead to a measles outbreak that killed 80 people.

And, yes, I have a family member who has a PhD in toxicology and medical research and another one who is a pediatric neurologist. They know what they're talking about when they tell you this guy is dangerous.

I can’t tell you anything about autism but my fake family members hate the guy so it must be true.