I mostly agree with you about desire and being good in bed. but many women don’t come from PIV and many men don’t understand this. it often isn’t about staying hard long enough, it’s about having other skills and not assuming getting (and staying) in is what it takes. Personally, I want to come before we get to that. |
DP. I’m not in this fight, but this sounds hot. I want my husband to assert authority over me and tell me that I have to do what he says without complaint or criticism. |
Crushes are not intrinsically moral things. People have crushes based on physical attractiveness, and often nothing happens. But a huge proportion of sexual relationships, affairs or otherwise, happen as a result of the woman experiencing the man's overwhelming desire and attraction for her. It's intoxicating |
Sexual affairs happen because someone expresses direct sexual interest. News at 11. Big deal. Attraction and interest is not necessarily the result of direct expression of sexual interest. |
Youre finally starting to get it... eureka! Yes, when men express sexual longing and desire for women, it often turns the woman on and leads to sex. Now... was that so hard to concede? |
People don't have crushes based solely on physically attraction. They're is an aspect of personality and charm. The only way a married woman experiences " overwhelming desire and attraction" from a man other than her husband is when she welcomes it. Most decent women shut it down quick. It does not mistakenly skip to the overwhelming stage. It's nutured and welcomed over time. So having sex with a crush when you are married is not some lesson on how to keep a wife happy. It's a lesson on how to lie with a nasty dog. |
That is a different poster. I am the PP you've been going back and forth with. I don't think they are agreeing with you though. Lol |
You think a ring goes on a woman's finger and men automatically stop being attracted to her? lol |
They were, whether that was their intention or not being a totally different story ![]() |
Nope. They clearly pointed out that interest is not a direct result of a man's expression of desire. |
I’m a woman and not person you are fighting with. Like the other PP, I don’t find your references to affairs very relevant to the issues here. |
And conceded that sexual relationships happen as a result of the male expression of desire. Which was the entire point everyone has been telling |
OR... instead of assuming that all people should do it the same way (which happens to be the way YOU think is right) you can love and respect your partner enough to meet them where they are, with compassion for what they've been through and are currently going through. Assuming people need to check boxes by a certain date is pathetically brittle thinking. |
I’m the poster, and a woman. And I disagreed with you. Attraction has many more components than just direct sexual expression. And as a PP above said, direct sexual expression can be a turn off in some circumstances. This discussion lost the plot along the way somewhere and just turned into a dumb fight. Yes, a man can do things to make his partner more interested. But putting as much responsibility for it on the man, as you have been, is self defeating. |
No. Most married women can tell a man in clear terms that they are not interested in whatever he is offering. And most men who are not creeps get the message loud and clear and shut it down. |