What right do we have to tell Iran they can’t have nuclear bombs?

[Anonymous]

An Israeli filed a lawsuit, and a federal court issued a nationwide injunction that Iran was not to be allowed a nuclear weapon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

You must not love Americans, pp

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An Israeli filed a lawsuit, and a federal court issued a nationwide injunction that Iran was not to be allowed a nuclear weapon.

Well, there ya go. That should settle it for good.


Because if there’s one thing I’ve ever learned from democrats, it’s that a federal judge in Hawaii wields more power than the entire Executive Branch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

I'm a democrat. I do not trust Iran and I do not trust Trump and everyone in his admisistration.

I fo not hatr Americans umless you are maga

Better?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same reason why Israel can have nukes despite bombing six countries in the past year while actively committing a genocide

Great point.

The fact that Israel has nukes (lots of them in fact) but ISN’T using them is exactly why Israel CAN have them.

Israel drops 500lb bombs on Gazan hospitals and children. That's why Israel shouldn't be allowed to have them. And yet they do.

Yeah! They should drop Legos on the hospitals used by Hamas to conceal their people and their infrastructure. That'll alter the course of the war for the better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:An Israeli filed a lawsuit, and a federal court issued a nationwide injunction that Iran was not to be allowed a nuclear weapon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given what Iran has consistently claimed to want to do, yes.

Go study up OP, did you just crawl out of a cave for 100 years?

Iran has been clear and consistent with their claim:

- they need to develop nuclear power generation to provide electricity for its people. What’s wrong with that?

Lack of credibility, maybe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same reason why Israel can have nukes despite bombing six countries in the past year while actively committing a genocide

Great point.

The fact that Israel has nukes (lots of them in fact) but ISN’T using them is exactly why Israel CAN have them.

Israel drops 500lb bombs on Gazan hospitals and children. That's why Israel shouldn't be allowed to have them. And yet they do.

Yeah! They should drop Legos on the hospitals used by Hamas to conceal their people and their infrastructure. That'll alter the course of the war for the better.

Thanks genocide apologist. What's next, those pesky Palestinian children deserve to die because they could grow up to be hamas?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We have them. Trump is a criminal.

And were "they" (not sure whom exactly) going to try any of our "leaders" for a war crime because um oh right WMD, where were the WMD anyways??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

No one is trying to take away your rifle or pistol and Iran isn't shooting up our kids in schools or churches or grocery stores every other day. So weighing the bigger threat, it's 100% Americans with guns meant for war.

I love how libs always start posts like this one ^^^ with something like “nO oNe Is tRyInG tO tAkE yUr gUNz aWaY!”…. And then they proceed to explain why we should take everyone’s guns away. That’s some hilarious sh!t right there 😆

Wow. Talk about a lack of comprehension. We used to have an AR ban and mass shootings were down. ARs are directly connected to our mass shootings. Can we own bombs? What about grenades? Define "Arms"?

WELL REGULATED is a phrase that's a part of the 2nd amendment. But whatever, cling on tight to that machine gun. It's what Jesus would do, right?

You know nothing but act so smug.

Mass shootings have always been around. Any shooting with more than 3 victims is a mass shooting. 77% of all mass shootings are done with a smaller handgun.

This is comical you know so little but feel so righteous. An AR-15 is not a machine gun. Please get educated because you’re making yourself look stupid.

Oh fer sure, if it's not a machine gun, then all is well. Who cares how many children have been killed by these not-machine guns.

Keep waving your hands jackass. No one is buying your BS.

Children also die by other methods every year. It’s mental illness that’s the problem. Many people die by cars but we don’t ban them or limit bigger cars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same reason why Israel can have nukes despite bombing six countries in the past year while actively committing a genocide

Great point.

The fact that Israel has nukes (lots of them in fact) but ISN’T using them is exactly why Israel CAN have them.

Israel drops 500lb bombs on Gazan hospitals and children. That's why Israel shouldn't be allowed to have them. And yet they do.

Yeah! They should drop Legos on the hospitals used by Hamas to conceal their people and their infrastructure. That'll alter the course of the war for the better.

Thanks genocide apologist. What's next, those pesky Palestinian children deserve to die because they could grow up to be hamas?

Well, leaving aside the reality that obviously all the Hamas member were t one time children, if they are not still presently, what's your suggestion for rooting Hamas out from civilian infrastructure? If you don't like bombs on hospitals, tell Hamas to not use hospitals for cover and concealment. The IDF will be happy to obliterate them elsewhere, where civilians are not in the line of fire. But giving Hamas a get out of jail free pass is not an option, given that about 50 hostages are still beinbg held, with maybe 20 of them still alive. If Hamas were to release the hostages and lay down their arms, maybe there'd be a different discussion to be had about hospitals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

No one is trying to take away your rifle or pistol and Iran isn't shooting up our kids in schools or churches or grocery stores every other day. So weighing the bigger threat, it's 100% Americans with guns meant for war.

I love how libs always start posts like this one ^^^ with something like “nO oNe Is tRyInG tO tAkE yUr gUNz aWaY!”…. And then they proceed to explain why we should take everyone’s guns away. That’s some hilarious sh!t right there 😆

Wow. Talk about a lack of comprehension. We used to have an AR ban and mass shootings were down. ARs are directly connected to our mass shootings. Can we own bombs? What about grenades? Define "Arms"?

WELL REGULATED is a phrase that's a part of the 2nd amendment. But whatever, cling on tight to that machine gun. It's what Jesus would do, right?

Oh my comprehension is just fine, thanks.

Here’s a homework assignment for ya:

Look into what the phrase “well regulated” meant in the context of 1791 prose.

Hint: it doesn’t mean “subjected to lots of rules, laws, regulations or……. infringements.

Here’s the funny thing about originalism. If that’s what the founders intended, why didn’t they state that in the constitution? That would seem to have been the originalism thing to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given what Iran has consistently claimed to want to do, yes.

Go study up OP, did you just crawl out of a cave for 100 years?

Iran has been clear and consistent with their claim:

- they need to develop nuclear power generation to provide electricity for its people. What’s wrong with that?

They didn't need 60%+ enriched uranium to generate nuclear power for electricity.

Uranium can typically power nuclear plants and generate electricity when it is 3%-5% enriched, meaning 3%-5% of the uranium is uranium-235. At 20% enriched, uranium-235 is considered highly enriched uranium, and 90% or higher is known as weapons-grade uranium.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

If you trust Iran more than Trump, go live there. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same reason why Israel can have nukes despite bombing six countries in the past year while actively committing a genocide

Great point.

The fact that Israel has nukes (lots of them in fact) but ISN’T using them is exactly why Israel CAN have them.

Israel drops 500lb bombs on Gazan hospitals and children. That's why Israel shouldn't be allowed to have them. And yet they do.

Yeah! They should drop Legos on the hospitals used by Hamas to conceal their people and their infrastructure. That'll alter the course of the war for the better.

Thanks genocide apologist. What's next, those pesky Palestinian children deserve to die because they could grow up to be hamas?

Well, leaving aside the reality that obviously all the Hamas member were t one time children, if they are not still presently, what's your suggestion for rooting Hamas out from civilian infrastructure? If you don't like bombs on hospitals, tell Hamas to not use hospitals for cover and concealment. The IDF will be happy to obliterate them elsewhere, where civilians are not in the line of fire. But giving Hamas a get out of jail free pass is not an option, given that about 50 hostages are still beinbg held, with maybe 20 of them still alive. If Hamas were to release the hostages and lay down their arms, maybe there'd be a different discussion to be had about hospitals.

I see posts like yours often, and I always wonder, “Does this propaganda drone actually think that anyone trusts any claims made by Israel, whether those claims are related to alleged Hamas members below schools and hospitals or something else?” … unfortunately, the only certainty one can have in dealing with radical, extremist Zionists is that the odds of them telling the truth are very, very low.